Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 718.101 (2025)
Short title.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
718.101 Short title.—This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Condominium Act.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Woodside Vill. Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Jahren, 806 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 2002).
Woodside Vill. Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Jahren, 806 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 2002). “See §§ 718.101-718.622, Fla. Stat. (2000); see also Winkelman v.”
In Re Boca Vill. Ass'n, Inc., 422 B.R. 318 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2009). “Pursuant to the terms of the Condominium Documents and the Condominium Act of the State of Florida, Fla. Stat. §§ 718.101 -.622 (“Condominium Act”), the Debtor was organized to administer and manage the operations of the Condominium, to enforce the provisions of the Declaration,…”
Winter v. Hollingsworth Props., Inc., 587 F. Supp. 1289 (S.D. Fla. 1984). “This Court takes judicial notice of the comprehensive protection provided by Florida’s consumer oriented condominium act, Fla.Stat. § 718.101. The very next page of the report concerns the 1979 amendments to ILSA.”
Edgewater by the Bay LLLP v. Gaunchez (In Re Edgewater by the Bay, LLLP), 419 B.R. 511 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2009). “A number of the Defendants have filed counterclaims against the Debtor alleging procedural violations of the Florida Condominium Act, Fla. Stat. §§ 718.101 et seq., violations of FDUTPA, and breach of contract based on Debtor’s alleged failure to timely complete the project…”
Marco Island Cable, Inc. v. Comcast Cablevision of the South, Inc., 509 F. Supp. 2d 1158 (M.D. Fla. 2007). “Two statutes from the Florida Condominium Act, Fla. Stat. §§ 718.101 — 718.622 are also relevant.”
Bruno v. Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC (In re Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC), 472 B.R. 582 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012). “suggests that the purchaser is in fact investing in a business enterprise, the return from which will be substantially dependent on the success of the managerial efforts of other person.”
Scudder v. Greenbrier C. Condo. Ass'n, 663 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). “See §§ 718.101 et seq., Fla. Stat. (1985). Thus, transportation costs could only have been assessed as a common expense prior to the 1988 amendment if the association's documents or bylaws provided as such.”
North Carillon, LLC v. CRC 603, LLC, 135 So. 3d 274 (Fla. 2014). “In this case we consider whether contracts for the purchase of two condominium units were voidable by the purchasers on the ground that the seller/developer failed to maintain the deposits paid by the buyers in escrow in the manner required by the Condominium Act, §§…”
Savanna Club Worship Serv., Inc. v. Savanna Club Homeowners' Ass'n, 456 F. Supp. 2d 1223 (S.D. Fla. 2005). “See Fla.Stat. 718.101, et seq. 14 . Plaintiff makes a "public forum” type of an argument requesting the Court to extend traditional public forum concepts discussed supra page 1226-27 to actions under the FHA.”
Palm Bay Towers Corp. v. Brooks, 466 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). “See §§ 718.101-.1255, Fla. Stat. (1983). [2] See also § 711.”
Derhem v. Bay House Miami Condo. Ass'n (S.D. Fla. 2025). “600 ); • Count II: Violation of Rights of Condominium Owner (§ 718.101, Fla. Stat.); • Count III: Violation of Rights of Condominium Owner (§ 718.”
Derhem v. Bay House Miami Condo. Ass'n (S.D. Fla. 2025). “600 ); • Counts II–IV: Violation of Rights of Condominium Owner (§718.101, §718.111, §718.123, §718.303, Fla.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.