Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 723.024 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 723.024 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 723.024

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 723
MOBILE HOME PARK LOT TENANCIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 723.024
723.024 Compliance by mobile home park owners and mobile home owners.Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or of any local law, ordinance, or code:
(1) If a unit of local government finds that a violation of a local code or ordinance has occurred, the unit of local government shall cite the responsible party for the violation and enforce the citation under its local code and ordinance enforcement authority.
(2) A lien, penalty, fine, or other administrative or civil proceeding may not be brought against a mobile home owner or mobile home for any duty or responsibility of the mobile home park owner under s. 723.022 or against a mobile home park owner or mobile home park property for any duty or responsibility of the mobile home owner under s. 723.023.
History.s. 1, ch. 2011-105.

F.S. 723.024 on Google Scholar

F.S. 723.024 on Casetext

Amendments to 723.024


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 723.024
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 723.024.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 723.024

Total Results: 20

CHHS HOSPITAL COMPANY LLC, D/B/A CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL v. JOHN HARMON

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-13T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: abuse of discretion." Drish, 298 So. 3d at 723–24 (ellipsis in original) (quoting Morgan v. Bank

ANANIAS WESTBROOK v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-01-10T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: subjects a pro se party to sanctions.” Id. at 723-24. The instant appeal is the fifth that has been

CHANTERIA NICOLE LACEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-02-23T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Thus, not every 3 See, e.g., Pearce, 395 U.S. at 723-24 (concluding “it would be a flagrant violation”

Marvin Love v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-10-30T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: motion. North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 723-24 (1969), overruled on other grounds by Alabama v

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. TRICIA DOMINGUEZ, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JUSTIN DOMINGUEZ

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-10-25T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Robinson, 472 So. 2d 722, 723-24 (Fla. 1985), in which the Florida Supreme Court

Trial Practices, Inc. v. Hahn Loester & Parks, LLP

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-10-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 228 So. 3d 1184

Snippet: Mangel v. Bob Dance Dodge, Inc., 739 So.2d 720, 723-24 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). In those cases, the parties

Department of Transportation v. Butler Carpet Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-05-31T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Jacksonville v. Twin Rests., Inc., 953 So. 2d 720, 723-24 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (reversing award of severance

Trial Practices, Inc. v. Hahn Loeser & Parks, LLP

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-04-12T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Mangel v. Bob Dance Dodge, Inc., 739 So. 2d 720, 723-24 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). In those cases, the parties

McInerney v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-03-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 213 So. 3d 933, 2017 WL 1013195, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3438

Snippet: 2008)); see also Brown v. State, 18 So.3d 723, 723-24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).1 Yet, in cases where the State

City of Sunny Isles Beach v. Calvary Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-01-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 208 So. 3d 1247, 2017 WL 361945, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 723

Snippet: for sale to a recreational developer. Id. at 723-24 (emphasis added). Just as in Boynton, the expert…and does not violate Yoder. Boynton, 265 So.2d at 723-24. Yoder, is different. In Yoder, the property

Arturo Godinez v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-06-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 192 So. 3d 1289, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10002

Snippet: also de la Osa v. State, 158 So.3d 712, 723-24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), rev. denied,

Arturo Godinez v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-04-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: ); see also de la Osa v. State, 158 So. 3d 712, 723–24 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 182 So. 3d 631 (Fla

Martha Miles v. City of Edgewater Police Department

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-04-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 190 So. 3d 171, 2016 WL 1578434, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5990

Snippet: evidence rejected in Triplett, 494 U.S. at 723-24, 110 S.Ct, 1428, and the evidence persuasively

Rodney L. Long Jr. v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-04-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 188 So. 3d 116, 2016 WL 1295087, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5182

Snippet: Criminal Cases—Report No. 2012-01, 109 So.3d 721, 723-24 (Fla.2013). The 2013 amendment then repeated the

James Robertson v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-03-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 187 So. 3d 1207, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 108, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 551

Snippet: .2003); Cox v. State, 819 So.2d 705, 723-24 (Fla. 2002). CONCLUSION The conviction

Laura M. Watson, P.A., d/b/a Watson & Lentner v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A., etc., William C. Hearon, P.A., etc. and Todd S. Stewart, P.A., etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-10-15T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: requirements. In Mercer v. Booby, 6 Fla. 723, 723-24 (1856), the question presented was whether defects

Laura M. Watson, P.A. v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-10-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 162 So. 3d 102, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16803, 2014 WL 5149106

Snippet: process requirements. In Mercer v. Booby, 6 Fla. 723, 723-24 (1856), the question presented was whether defects

Puglisi v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-04-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 112 So. 3d 1196, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 231, 2013 WL 1457829, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 672

Snippet: than another.” United States v. Boyd, 86 F.3d 719, 723-24 (7th Cir.1996). As eloquently stated by the Eleventh

Braddy v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-11-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 111 So. 3d 810, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 703, 2012 WL 5514368, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2357

Snippet: cases. For example, in Cox v. State, 819 So.2d 705, 723-24 (Fla.2002), we upheld the death penalty where the

A. H. v. Florida Department of Children & Family Services

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-05-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 85 So. 3d 1213, 2012 WL 1514435, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6751

Snippet: if they were returned to appellant. See id. at 723-24 (“The trial court is required to determine whether