Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 726.111 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 726.111 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 726.111 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 726.111

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLI
STATUTE OF FRAUDS, FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS, AND GENERAL ASSIGNMENTS
Chapter 726
FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 726.111
726.111 Supplementary provisions.Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101-726.112, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency, or other validating or invalidating cause, supplement those provisions.
History.s. 11, ch. 87-79.

F.S. 726.111 on Google Scholar

F.S. 726.111 on CourtListener

Amendments to 726.111


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 726.111

Total Results: 9

AMJAD MUNIM, MD, PA v. Azar

648 So. 2d 145, 1994 WL 457141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 2465709

Cited 30 times | Published

codifies common law unless expressly replaced. See § 726.111, Fla. Stat. (1988). Under the UFTA, any transfer

Invo Florida, Inc. v. Somerset Venturer, Inc.

751 So. 2d 1263, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2752, 2000 WL 276350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2000 | Docket: 1310149

Cited 25 times | Published

invalidating cause, supplement those provisions. § 726.111, Fla. Stat. (1991)(emphasis added). See also Rubio

Advest, Inc. v. Rader

743 F. Supp. 851, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16582, 1990 WL 104847

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1990 | Docket: 246172

Cited 17 times | Published

and Louise Rader are citizens of Florida. [9] § 726.111 "Supplementary Provisions" of the Uniform Fraudulent

United States v. Romano

757 F. Supp. 1331, 1989 WL 237755

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1989 | Docket: 1237968

Cited 12 times | Published

developed under previous statutes and case law.[3]Id. § 726.111. These principles have been preserved as supplementary

Lewis B. Freeman v. First Union National

329 F.3d 1231

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 7, 2003 | Docket: 397655

Cited 6 times | Published

Invo, 751 So.2d at 1267 (citing Fla. Stat. § 726.111 (2002)). Together these provisions suggest that

Jones v. MTLC Investment, Ltd. (In Re Hill)

332 B.R. 835, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 436, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2129, 2005 WL 2483338

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2005 | Docket: 1574319

Cited 3 times | Published

2d 1071, 1078 (Fla.2001).[7] Florida Statute § 726.111, specifically provides that, unless displaced

Amjad Munim, M.D., P.A. v. Azar

648 So. 2d 145, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 64753225

Cited 3 times | Published

codifies common law unless expressly replaced. See § 726.111, Fla.Stat. (1988). Under the UFTA, any transfer

SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Neverve LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 11, 2023 | Docket: 65769688

Published

Argued: Nov 18, 2022

the transferor. SEPH, however, raises section 726.111, which pro- vides that “[u]nless displaced

Mansolillo v. Parties by Lynn, Inc.

753 So. 2d 637, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2004, 2000 WL 227938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2000 | Docket: 64795931

Published

equity .... supplement those provisions.” Id. § 726.111. Thus, equitable considerations can be taken into