Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 726.111 (2025)

Supplementary provisions.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

726.111 Supplementary provisions.—Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101-726.112, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency, or other validating or invalidating cause, supplement those provisions.

History.—s. 11, ch. 87-79.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 12 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Invo Florida, Inc. v. Somerset Venturer, Inc., 751 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Invo Florida, Inc. v. Somerset Venturer, Inc., 751 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). · cites it 2× “§ 726.111, Fla. Stat. (1991)(emphasis added).”

SE Prop. Holdings, LLC v. Neverve LLC, 65 F.4th 1335 (11th Cir. 2023). “2d at 1547 ; see also Fla. Stat. § 726.111 . But FUFTA contains a separate provision specifically enumerating a creditor’s remedies against transferors, and as previously explained, we interpret sec- tion 726.”

Amjad Munim, M.D., P.A. v. Azar, 648 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). · cites it 2× “See § 726.111, Fla.Stat. (1988). Under the UFTA, any transfer made with “actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud” any present or future creditor is a fraudulent transfer.”

Lewis B. Freeman v. First Union Nat'l, 329 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2× “And in contrast to the district court’s interpretation, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals has treated an action for fraudulent transfer as a tort.”

Advest, Inc. v. Rader, 743 F. Supp. 851 (S.D. Fla. 1990). “§ 726.111 "Supplementary Provisions" of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act states that unless displaced by the express provisions of the new act, the principles and law and equity under the earlier statute remain intact, and supplement the provisions of the new act.”

Jones v. MTLC Inv., Ltd. (In Re Hill), 332 B.R. 835 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005). “7 Florida Statute § 726.111, specifically provides that, unless displaced by the provisions of § 726.”

United States v. Romano, 757 F. Supp. 1331 (M.D. Fla. 1989). “§ 726.111. These principles have been preserved as supplementary provisions to the UFTA.”

Morris v. Comm'r, 2000 T.C. Memo. 381 (Tax Ct. 2000). “Unless displaced by the express provisions of the new act, the principles, law, and equity under Fla. Stat. 726.01 remain intact and supplement the provisions of the UFTA.”

Mansolillo v. Parties by Lynn, Inc., 753 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). “§ 726.111. Thus, equitable considerations can be taken into account.”

Amjad Munim, Md, Pa v. Azar, 648 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). · cites it 2× “See § 726.111, Fla. Stat. (1988). Under the UFTA, any transfer made with "actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud" any present or future creditor is a fraudulent transfer.”

Comm'r, 2001 T.C. Memo. 182 (1970). · cites it 2× “01 continue to apply to post-1987 transfers.”

De Larrea v. Golden Yacht Charters, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 2× “” Fla. Stat. § 726.111 . Florida courts likewise recognize laches can bar state fraud-based claims.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.