Cases from cite.case.law:

COHEN, v. SHUSHAN R. Or L., 212 So. 3d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Cohen’s surviving spouse under section 731.102. . . .

IN RE ELLIS, SS XXX- XX- XXXX, v., 493 B.R. 818 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2013)

. . . provide an example of a risk designation system for agency use in an OPM issuance as described in Sec. 731.102 . . . Sec. 731.102(c) and 732.201(b). (3)If suitability issues develop prior to the required investigation, . . .

M. JUEGA, v. S. DAVIDSON, S., 105 So. 3d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Probate Code constitutes a unified statutory scheme intended to govern all probate matters— section 731.102 . . . Davis, 70 So.3d 572 (quoting § 731.102, Fla. Stat. (2007)) (emphasis added). . . .

INTERSTATE FIRE CASUALTY COMPANY, v. ABERNATHY, LLC,, 93 So. 3d 352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 731.102(1) (2011) ("Insurance” means "a contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another or pay . . .

HILL, v. DAVIS,, 70 So. 3d 572 (Fla. 2011)

. . . Probate Code constitutes a unified statutory scheme intended to govern all probate matters— section 731.102 . . . , expressly states that the probate code “is intended as unified coverage of its subject matter.” § 731.102 . . .

BAILLARGEON, D v. SEWELL, 33 So. 3d 130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 731.102 (“This code is intended as unified coverage of its subject matter.”). . . .

ASHBY, v. FARMERS GROUP, INC., 261 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (D. Or. 2003)

. . . . § 731.102(1). . . .

AQUA- MARINE CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. BANKS, d b a a POLARIS INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. a v. AQUA- MARINE CONSTRUCTORS, INC. d b a d b a II a, 110 F.3d 663 (9th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 731.102(1). . . .

TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. PHILADELPHIA LIFE INSURANCE CO. RASK ASSOCIATES, v. L. GRIFFITH,, 795 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . . §§ 731.102(2), 731,154 (1985). . . .