Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 747.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 747.03 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 747.03

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLIII
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
Chapter 747
CONSERVATORSHIP
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 747.03
747.03 Petition.
(1) The jurisdiction of the court shall be invoked by the filing of a petition by any person who would have an interest in the property or estate of the absentee were such absentee deceased or any person who is dependent on said absentee for his or her maintenance or support.
(2) The petition shall be sworn to by the petitioner and shall state:
(a) The names, addresses, and ages of the spouse, children, mother, father, brothers, and sisters, or, if none of these is living, the next of kin, of the absentee;
(b) The name, address, and age of any other person who would have an interest in the property or the estate of the absentee if he or she were deceased;
(c) The exact circumstances which cause the person missing to be an absentee under s. 747.01 including the date he or she was first known to be missing, interned, beleaguered, etc.;
(d) The necessity for establishing a conservatorship;
(e) Whether or not the person alleged to be an absentee has a will and the whereabouts of said will; and
(f) A statement of all property constituting an asset of the alleged absentee’s estate or in which he or she has any interest and the approximate value of same.
History.s. 3, ch. 22888, 1945; s. 5, ch. 71-103; s. 1131, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 747.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 747.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 747.03


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 747.03
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 747.03.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 747.03

Total Results: 7

DEVON MARQUISE DAVIS vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-10-20T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: involuntary. Guerra, 331 So. 3d at 747. 3 Here, Davis averred that

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure & the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-12-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 132 So. 3d 734, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 884, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2638, 2013 WL 6331351

Snippet: incarceration and total time for credit already provided; *747(3) the dates, location of incarceration and total

Cohen v. Guardianship of Cohen

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-03-08T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 896 So. 2d 950

Snippet: altered or cancelled informally. See 7 A.L.R.3d 747 § 3(b). For instance, in Nelson v. Schoonover, 89 Kan

Spruce Creek Dev. of Ocala v. Drew

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-09-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 746 So. 2d 1109

Snippet: Later revisions to the statute included section 316.0747(3), Florida Statutes (1997). [3] In Jones v. Mississippi

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1991-10-17T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: installing traffic control devices pursuant to s. 316.0747(3), F.S. (1990 Supp.)? SUMMARY: Private residential…regardless of the presence of a guardhouse. Section 316.0747(3), F.S. (1990 Supp.), provides: Nongovernmental… travel on its roads would be subject to s. 316.0747(3), F.S. (1990 Supp.). Whether a guardhouse regulates…rules which would allow an exemption from s.316.0747(3), F.S. (1990 Supp.), for private residential subdivisions…travel upon its streets from compliance with s. 316.0747(3), F.S. (1990 Supp.). Sincerely, Robert A. Butterworth

Fundament v. May

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-02-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 445 So. 2d 710

Snippet: ] Hernandez v. Clinica Pasteur, Inc., 293 So.2d 747 (3 DCA 74). Subsequent to oral argument in the present

Zaydon v. Wilder

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-12-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 305 So. 2d 81

Snippet: 781; Zide v. Arthur, Fla.App. 1963, 153 So.2d 747. The 3 per cent deposit was clearly not what Dr. Zaydon