Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 760.10 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 760.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 760.10 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 760.10

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLIV
CIVIL RIGHTS
Chapter 760
DISCRIMINATION IN THE TREATMENT OF PERSONS; MINORITY REPRESENTATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 760.10
760.10 Unlawful employment practices.—
(1) It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer:
(a) To discharge or to fail or refuse to hire any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.
(b) To limit, segregate, or classify employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or adversely affect any individual’s status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.
(2) It is an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.
(3) It is an unlawful employment practice for a labor organization:
(a) To exclude or to expel from its membership, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.
(b) To limit, segregate, or classify its membership or applicants for membership, or to classify or fail or refuse to refer for employment any individual, in any way that would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or adversely affect any individual’s status as an employee or as an applicant for employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.
(c) To cause or attempt to cause an employer to discriminate against an individual in violation of this section.
(4) It is an unlawful employment practice for any employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs, to discriminate against any individual because of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status in admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training.
(5) Whenever, in order to engage in a profession, occupation, or trade, it is required that a person receive a license, certification, or other credential, become a member or an associate of any club, association, or other organization, or pass any examination, it is an unlawful employment practice for any person to discriminate against any other person seeking such license, certification, or other credential, seeking to become a member or associate of such club, association, or other organization, or seeking to take or pass such examination, because of such other person’s race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.
(6) It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or joint labor-management committee to print, or cause to be printed or published, any notice or advertisement relating to employment, membership, classification, referral for employment, or apprenticeship or other training, indicating any preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination, based on race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, absence of handicap, or marital status.
(7) It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer, an employment agency, a joint labor-management committee, or a labor organization to discriminate against any person because that person has opposed any practice which is an unlawful employment practice under this section, or because that person has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this section.
(8)(a) Subjecting any individual, as a condition of employment, membership, certification, licensing, credentialing, or passing an examination, to training, instruction, or any other required activity that espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates, or compels such individual to believe any of the following concepts constitutes discrimination based on race, color, sex, or national origin under this section:
1. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another race, color, sex, or national origin.
2. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously.
3. An individual’s moral character or status as either privileged or oppressed is necessarily determined by his or her race, color, sex, or national origin.
4. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race, color, sex, or national origin.
5. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, bears responsibility for, or should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment because of, actions committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, sex, or national origin.
6. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment to achieve diversity, equity, or inclusion.
7. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, bears personal responsibility for and must feel guilt, anguish, or other forms of psychological distress because of actions, in which the individual played no part, committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, sex, or national origin.
8. Such virtues as merit, excellence, hard work, fairness, neutrality, objectivity, and racial colorblindness are racist or sexist, or were created by members of a particular race, color, sex, or national origin to oppress members of another race, color, sex, or national origin.
(b) Paragraph (a) may not be construed to prohibit discussion of the concepts listed therein as part of a course of training or instruction, provided such training or instruction is given in an objective manner without endorsement of the concepts.
(9) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, it is not an unlawful employment practice under ss. 760.01-760.10 for an employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee to:
(a) Take or fail to take any action on the basis of religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status in those certain instances in which religion, sex, condition of pregnancy, national origin, age, absence of a particular handicap, or marital status is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary for the performance of the particular employment to which such action or inaction is related.
(b) Observe the terms of a bona fide seniority system, a bona fide employee benefit plan such as a retirement, pension, or insurance plan, or a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production, which is not designed, intended, or used to evade the purposes of ss. 760.01-760.10. However, no such employee benefit plan or system which measures earnings shall excuse the failure to hire, and no such seniority system, employee benefit plan, or system which measures earnings shall excuse the involuntary retirement of, any individual on the basis of any factor not related to the ability of such individual to perform the particular employment for which such individual has applied or in which such individual is engaged. This subsection shall not be construed to make unlawful the rejection or termination of employment when the individual applicant or employee has failed to meet bona fide requirements for the job or position sought or held or to require any changes in any bona fide retirement or pension programs or existing collective bargaining agreements during the life of the contract, or for 2 years after October 1, 1981, whichever occurs first, nor shall this act preclude such physical and medical examinations of applicants and employees as an employer may require of applicants and employees to determine fitness for the job or position sought or held.
(c) Take or fail to take any action on the basis of age, pursuant to law or regulation governing any employment or training program designed to benefit persons of a particular age group.
(d) Take or fail to take any action on the basis of marital status if that status is prohibited under its antinepotism policy.
(10) This section shall not apply to any religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society which conditions opportunities in the area of employment or public accommodation to members of that religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society or to persons who subscribe to its tenets or beliefs. This section shall not prohibit a religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society from giving preference in employment to individuals of a particular religion to perform work connected with the carrying on by such corporations, associations, educational institutions, or societies of its various activities.
(11) Each employer, employment agency, and labor organization shall post and keep posted in conspicuous places upon its premises a notice provided by the commission setting forth such information as the commission deems appropriate to effectuate the purposes of ss. 760.01-760.10.
History.—s. 6, ch. 77-341; s. 2, ch. 78-49; s. 5, ch. 79-400; s. 1, ch. 81-109; s. 7, ch. 92-177; ss. 2, 4, ch. 92-282; s. 6, ch. 2015-68; s. 1, ch. 2022-72.
Note.—Former ss. 13.261, 23.167.

F.S. 760.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 760.10 on CourtListener

Amendments to 760.10


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 760.10

Total Results: 208

Adem A. Albra v. Advan, Inc.

490 F.3d 826, 68 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 241, 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 680, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15175, 2007 WL 1814677

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 26, 2007 | Docket: 474837

Cited 643 times | Published

individual’s “handicap.” Fla. Stat. § 760.10(l)(a) (emphasis added). “The FCRA is modeled after

Portia Surtain v. Hamlin Terrace Foundation

789 F.3d 1239, 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1259, 24 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1517, 24 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1517, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10100, 127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 833, 2015 WL 3719501

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 16, 2015 | Docket: 2665379

Cited 521 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.10. Second, she alleges that Hamlin discriminated

Alvarez v. Royal Atlantic Developers, Inc.

610 F.3d 1253, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13597, 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,933, 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162, 2010 WL 2631839

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 2, 2010 | Docket: 1547209

Cited 456 times | Published

Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a); and (4) retaliation in violation of Fla. Stat. § 760.10(7).[8] She alleged

Lea Cordoba v. Dillard's Inc.

419 F.3d 1169, 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1774, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16082, 2 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 12, 2005 WL 1838530

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 4, 2005 | Docket: 687760

Cited 425 times | Published

(emphasis added); see also Fla. Stat. § 760.10(a) (“It is an unlawful employment practice for

Greenberg v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.

498 F.3d 1258, 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1153, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21670, 2007 WL 2577030

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 10, 2007 | Docket: 398982

Cited 248 times | Published

et seq., and its Florida analogue, Fla. Stat. § 760.10, et seq.[1] On appeal, Greenberg argues that there

Vivian Burke-Fowler v. Orange County Florida

447 F.3d 1319, 2006 WL 770638, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7486, 98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 19

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 2006 | Docket: 345565

Cited 162 times | Published

violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10. The County filed a motion for summary judgment

Howard v. Walgreen Co.

605 F.3d 1239, 76 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1083, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9764, 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,882, 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 477

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 2010 | Docket: 1406412

Cited 142 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA"), Fla. Stat. § 760.10, et seq. Walgreens also appeals the magistrate

Anthony Mazzeo v. Color Resolutions Int'l, LLC

746 F.3d 1264, 29 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 757, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5944, 122 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 543, 2014 WL 1274070

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 31, 2014 | Docket: 2902128

Cited 141 times | Published

and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10 (the “FCRA”). The district court granted summary

Byrd v. Richardson-Greenshields Securities, Inc.

552 So. 2d 1099, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 549, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1782, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1057, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,446, 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1606, 1989 WL 128596

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1989 | Docket: 1200796

Cited 126 times | Published

employment, because of such individual's ... sex... ." § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987). In interpreting Title

Joshua v. City of Gainesville

768 So. 2d 432, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 641, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1751, 2000 WL 1227755

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2000 | Docket: 629162

Cited 107 times | Published

retaliation by the City in *434 violation of section 760.10(7)[1]. On January 20, 1998, Joshua filed a

Godwin v. State

593 So. 2d 211, 1992 WL 4452

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1992 | Docket: 1447514

Cited 93 times | Published

(1989) (discrimination in educational programs); § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (1989) (employment discrimination)

78 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1081, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 4571, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 328 William J. Bogle v. Orange County Board of County Commissioners as Governing Body of Orange County, Florida

162 F.3d 653

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 9, 1998 | Docket: 2038039

Cited 89 times | Published

the ADEA and Florida's Human Rights law, Fla. Stat. 760.10. Before trial, the district court denied

Alma Knight v. Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc.

330 F.3d 1313, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 9347, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,428, 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1487, 2003 WL 21078179

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 14, 2003 | Docket: 397635

Cited 85 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Florida Statutes, § 760.10 (2000).1 Baptist moved for summary judgment, arguing

Russell Musnick v. King Motor Company of Fort Lauderdale, d.b.a., King Auto Mall

325 F.3d 1255, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6014, 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 771, 2003 WL 1591270

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 28, 2003 | Docket: 397565

Cited 69 times | Published

in violation of Title VII and Florida Statute § 760.10. Pursuant to the Agreement, King filed a motion

State v. Stalder

630 So. 2d 1072, 1994 WL 19548

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1994 | Docket: 1519588

Cited 55 times | Published

creates a hostile work environment for women. § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1992). A woman may hate blacks

77 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 297, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1537 J.R. Rudy Williams v. Vitro Services Corporation Tracor Flight Systems, Inc. Tracor, Inc.

144 F.3d 1438

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 1, 1998 | Docket: 661005

Cited 49 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 760.10. The district court determined that Williams

Frank J. PARISE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DELTA AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee

141 F.3d 1463, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10562, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,446, 76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1754, 1998 WL 271147

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 28, 1998 | Docket: 629210

Cited 47 times | Published

age. The action was filed pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 760.10(l)(a) and 42 U.S.C. § 1984. 1 Delta

Donato v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.

767 So. 2d 1146, 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1302

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2000 | Docket: 1193997

Cited 42 times | Published

based on marital status discrimination under section 760.10 of the Florida Statutes "where the employee

Florida Dept. of Community Affairs v. Bryant

586 So. 2d 1205, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9078, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,504, 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 928, 1991 WL 183022

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1991 | Docket: 1292950

Cited 38 times | Published

not be the best method for hiring, neither section 760.10 nor Title VII imposes a duty to adopt a hiring

Ranger Ins. Co. v. Bal Harbour Club

549 So. 2d 1005, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 416, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 814, 1989 WL 101534

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1989 | Docket: 2483737

Cited 34 times | Published

641.3102 (in HMOs); chapter 760 (in housing); § 760.10 (in employment); § 849.093 (in public games);

Maggio v. Fla. Dept. of Labor & Emp. SEC.

899 So. 2d 1074, 2005 WL 673677

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2005 | Docket: 757462

Cited 33 times | Published

of the waiver contained in section 768.28. Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2003), provides that

Florida State University v. Sondel

685 So. 2d 923, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13591, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,927, 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1001, 1996 WL 720617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1996 | Docket: 1735211

Cited 30 times | Published

[1] and more specifically, the provisions of section 760.10 relating to unlawful employment practices.

Florida State University v. Sondel

685 So. 2d 923, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13591, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,927, 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1001, 1996 WL 720617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1996 | Docket: 1735211

Cited 30 times | Published

[1] and more specifically, the provisions of section 760.10 relating to unlawful employment practices.

Brand v. Florida Power Corp.

633 So. 2d 504, 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 102, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1695, 1994 WL 64952

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1994 | Docket: 1708063

Cited 26 times | Published

under Florida's Human Rights Act. For example, Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes, prohibits, as does

Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc.

948 So. 2d 921, 2007 WL 461322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2007 | Docket: 2518341

Cited 22 times | Published

Statutes; and (2) the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2004); and for (3)

Kelly v. K.D. Construction of Florida, Inc.

866 F. Supp. 1406, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15683, 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 720, 1994 WL 605949

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1994 | Docket: 808762

Cited 20 times | Published

, and the Florida Human Rights Act, Fla.Stat. § 760.10. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant

Russell v. KSL Hotel Corp.

887 So. 2d 372, 2004 WL 2101995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2004 | Docket: 679977

Cited 18 times | Published

was evidence to support the jury's verdict. Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2002), which prohibits

City of Hollywood v. Hogan

986 So. 2d 634, 2008 WL 2261504

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2008 | Docket: 1728096

Cited 17 times | Published

prohibits age discrimination in the workplace. See § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007). It follows federal law

Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC v. Dupont

933 So. 2d 75, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8251, 98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 459, 2006 WL 1458929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 1711943

Cited 17 times | Published

basis for a hostile work environment case under section 760.10, by the statements in her affidavit in opposition

Albert v. National Cash Register Co.

874 F. Supp. 1324, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20833, 1995 WL 13655

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1994 | Docket: 2506758

Cited 16 times | Published

the Florida Human Rights Act, Florida Statutes § 760.10. Joint Scheduling and Status Report, pp. 1-2 [D

Hartley v. Ocean Reef Club, Inc.

476 So. 2d 1327, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2276, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1985 | Docket: 1681495

Cited 16 times | Published

by state or any subdivision on basis of age); § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (1983) (for discharge or discrimination

Klonis v. State, Dept. of Revenue

766 So. 2d 1186, 2000 WL 1298940

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2000 | Docket: 1329890

Cited 15 times | Published

national origin, age, handicap, or marital status. § 760.10(1) & (7), Fla. Stat. (1997). In his complaint

Blount v. Sterling Healthcare Group, Inc.

934 F. Supp. 1365, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11239, 1996 WL 444930

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 1996 | Docket: 1780139

Cited 15 times | Published

as given to its federal prototype. Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a) states: (1) It is an unlawful employment

Shuttleworth v. Broward County

639 F. Supp. 654, 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 925, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23064, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,308, 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 406

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1986 | Docket: 1341204

Cited 15 times | Published

believe that Defendant BROWARD COUNTY violated Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), by terminating

Richardson v. Tricom Pictures & Productions, Inc.

334 F. Supp. 2d 1303, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18897, 2004 WL 2110512

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2004 | Docket: 2384470

Cited 14 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA"), and Fla. Stat. § 760.10. Richardson further alleged state law tort claims

O'Loughlin v. Pinchback

579 So. 2d 788, 1991 WL 75590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1991 | Docket: 1728694

Cited 14 times | Published

Weaver, 556 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides in part:

Gray v. Russell Corp.

681 So. 2d 310, 1996 WL 587858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1996 | Docket: 1385176

Cited 13 times | Published

violation of Florida Statutes, and specifically section 760.10, et seq., Florida's Human Rights Act of 1977

Razner v. Wellington Regional Medical Center, Inc.

837 So. 2d 437, 2002 WL 31557360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2002 | Docket: 1527457

Cited 12 times | Published

based on a bona fide occupational qualification. § 760.10(1)(a), (8)(a) Fla. Stat. (2001). Claims made under

Huck v. Mega Nursing Services, Inc.

989 F. Supp. 1462, 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1523, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21475, 1997 WL 817204

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1997 | Docket: 1074048

Cited 12 times | Published

Florida Statutes) and The Florida Civil Rights Act (§ 760-10, Florida Statutes). II. DISCUSSION In the instant

Sanders v. Mayor's Jewelers, Inc.

942 F. Supp. 571, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14223, 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,654, 76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 355, 1996 WL 550129

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1996 | Docket: 1247485

Cited 12 times | Published

age, handicap, or marital status." Fla.Stat. § 760.10(1)(a) (emphasis added). "`Employer' means any

National Ind., Inc. v. Com'n on Human Relations

527 So. 2d 894, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1490, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2663, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,072, 1988 WL 62663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1988 | Docket: 2517298

Cited 12 times | Published

`unfair' action is not an automatic violation of Section 760.10(1)(a) Florida Statutes. The Petitioner did

Jones v. Bank of America

985 F. Supp. 2d 1320, 2013 WL 6085137, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164730

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2013 | Docket: 65995948

Cited 11 times | Published

discrimination, alleging that Defendant violated Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1). Plaintiff alleges that she was employed by

Trumbull v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

756 F. Supp. 532, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1666, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,588, 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 750, 1991 WL 16677

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1991 | Docket: 2135246

Cited 11 times | Published

Florida Commission on Human Relations. Fla.Stat. § 760.10(12). This charge must be filed within 180 days

Grant v. Miami-Dade County Water & Sewer Department

636 F. App'x 462

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 23, 2015 | Docket: 65961599

Cited 10 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.10.1 Grant claims that he was denied training opportunities

Matthews v. City of Gulfport

72 F. Supp. 2d 1328, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16919, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1603, 1999 WL 997322

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1999 | Docket: 2206405

Cited 10 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as amended, § 760.10 et seq. ("FCRA"), the Civil Rights Act of 1871

McCaw Cellular Communications of Fla., Inc. v. Kwiatek

763 So. 2d 1063, 1999 WL 543221

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1999 | Docket: 2451752

Cited 10 times | Published

against him in violation of Florida Statutes, § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (1993). At this time, he was still

Davidson v. Iona-McGregor Fire Protection and Rescue Dist.

674 So. 2d 858, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5318, 1996 WL 273640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1996 | Docket: 1194936

Cited 10 times | Published

Rescue District, alleging that it had violated section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1991), by discriminating

Ali v. City of Clearwater

807 F. Supp. 701, 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 299, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17867, 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,203, 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 590, 1992 WL 349477

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1992 | Docket: 1795841

Cited 10 times | Published

the Florida Human Rights Act of 1977, as amended § 760.10, Fla.Stat. (1991), and Article I, Section 2 of

Morrow v. Duval County School Bd.

514 So. 2d 1086, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,881

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1987 | Docket: 2517163

Cited 10 times | Published

alleging an unlawful employment practice under section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1985). That section provides

Duble v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.

572 F. App'x 889

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 24, 2014 | Docket: 65957255

Cited 9 times | Published

proceeding, or hearing under the FCRA. Fla. Stat. § 760.10(7). We evaluate ADA and FCRA retaliation cases

Ross v. Jim Adams Ford, Inc.

871 So. 2d 312, 2004 WL 1057655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2004 | Docket: 1300677

Cited 9 times | Published

violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. See § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993) (prohibiting employers

Greene v. Seminole Elec. Co-Op., Inc.

701 So. 2d 646, 1997 WL 710317

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1997 | Docket: 1736913

Cited 9 times | Published

obese, sued SEC, his employer, pursuant to section 760.10, Florida Statutes, the Florida Civil Rights

Nazon v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.

832 F. Supp. 1540, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13868, 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1621, 1993 WL 387358

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1993 | Docket: 899107

Cited 9 times | Published

Human Rights Act of 1977, as amended, Fla.Stat. § 760.10 et seq., and Florida tort law, alleges sexual

Corkery v. SuperX Drugs Corp.

602 F. Supp. 42, 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1815

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1985 | Docket: 1200757

Cited 9 times | Published

guidance, and offer as alternatives Fla.Stat. § 760.10(10) (1983) (180 days for handicap discrimination);

Sunbeam Television Corp. v. Mitzel

83 So. 3d 865, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 485, 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 354, 2012 WL 126784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2012 | Docket: 60306518

Cited 8 times | Published

of the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”).3 See § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (2006). This charging *868document

Williams v. Eckerd Family Youth Alternative

908 F. Supp. 908, 1995 WL 775079

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1995 | Docket: 1019325

Cited 8 times | Published

amended, and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.10, Fla.Stat. (1993). In order for Plaintiffs to

Paris v. City of Coral Gables

951 F. Supp. 1584, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21385, 1995 WL 908603

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1995 | Docket: 2306880

Cited 8 times | Published

filed under the Florida Human Rights Act ("FHRA"), § 760.10, Florida Statutes, individual capacity claims

Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

548 So. 2d 231, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 415, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 826, 1989 WL 101543

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1989 | Docket: 1699053

Cited 8 times | Published

Statutes (1983), governs claims brought under section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1983). We hold that the

Kelley v. Bechtel Power Corp.

633 F. Supp. 927, 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 865, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28193, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 83, 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,012

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1986 | Docket: 1266889

Cited 8 times | Published

Plaintiff handicapped within the meaning of Section 760.10(1), Fla.Stat., by reason of his "convulsive

Shedrick v. District Board of Trustees of Miami-Dade College

941 F. Supp. 2d 1348, 2013 WL 1748789, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57947

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2013 | Docket: 65990856

Cited 7 times | Published

discrimina*1364tion based on disability. See Fla. Stat. § 760.10. Thus, Williams’s failure to include retaliation

Hinton v. Supervision Intern., Inc.

942 So. 2d 986, 2006 WL 3452403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2006 | Docket: 1471138

Cited 7 times | Published

making her claim of retaliation, pursuant to section 760.10(7) of the Florida Statutes, the sole basis

Quick v. Tripp, Scott, Conklin & Smith, P.A.

43 F. Supp. 2d 1357, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5529, 1999 WL 228745

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1999 | Docket: 2295359

Cited 7 times | Published

things, physical and mental disabilities. See § 760.10(1), Fla.Stat. Because the Florida Act is patterned

Dudley v. Metro-Dade County

989 F. Supp. 1192, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21903, 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1203, 1997 WL 809691

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1997 | Docket: 1074294

Cited 7 times | Published

violations of Florida's Civil Rights Act, Fla.St. § 760.10, Florida Dept. of Community Affairs v. Bryant

F.M. v. Palm Beach County

912 F. Supp. 514, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21118, 1995 WL 793689

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1995 | Docket: 1814929

Cited 7 times | Published

violation of 1) The Florida Human Rights Act, Fla.Stat. 760.10, 2) The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S

Wineberger v. RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc.

672 F. App'x 914

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 30, 2016 | Docket: 65964051

Cited 6 times | Published

under the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10(l)(a). Ms. Wineberger filed this suit after Race-Trac

Young v. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A.

88 So. 3d 1002, 2012 WL 1859108, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2012 | Docket: 60308104

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Florida Statute § 760.10, et seq. The *1010complaint also alleged negligent

Maldonado v. Publix Supermarkets

939 So. 2d 290, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17271, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2006 | Docket: 1237740

Cited 6 times | Published

assert a claim for sexual harassment under section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2003). Similar to Title

Rivera v. Torfino Enterprises, Inc.

914 So. 2d 1087, 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1415, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18803, 98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 766, 2005 WL 3179984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2005 | Docket: 12959

Cited 6 times | Published

national origin, age, handicap, or marital status. § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004). A supplementary provision

Guess v. City of Miramar

889 So. 2d 840, 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 216, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17345, 2004 WL 2600496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2004 | Docket: 1488499

Cited 6 times | Published

The anti-retaliatory provisions of the FCRA, section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1999),[2] provide: It is

Mousa v. Lauda Air Luftfahrt, A.G.

258 F. Supp. 2d 1329, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11159

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2003 | Docket: 2347453

Cited 6 times | Published

of such individual's ... religion." Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a). The FCRA defines an "employer" as "any

Jenkins v. Golf Channel

714 So. 2d 558, 1998 WL 335789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1998 | Docket: 461600

Cited 6 times | Published

Civil Rights Act of 1964 and/or Florida Statutes § 760.10 for the sexual harassment of female employees;

Pettis v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.

896 F. Supp. 1163, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11518, 1995 WL 465831

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1995 | Docket: 1164603

Cited 6 times | Published

Acts are identical. Compare § 760.10(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993), with § 760.10(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1991). [2]

Bolves v. Hullinger

629 So. 2d 198, 1993 WL 462002

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1993 | Docket: 1264002

Cited 6 times | Published

of limitations governs claims brought under section 760.10. Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 516

St. Petersburg Motor Club v. Cook

567 So. 2d 488, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6939, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,403, 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1736, 1990 WL 132030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1990 | Docket: 1721591

Cited 6 times | Published

order finding that the appellant had violated section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), and ordering

School Bd. of Leon County v. Weaver

556 So. 2d 443, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 404, 55 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1562, 1990 WL 3650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1990 | Docket: 1528381

Cited 6 times | Published

consider to be plainly stated to the contrary. Section 760.10(13) provides in part: "No liability for back

VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA v. TARA LUSCAVICH

240 So. 3d 733

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2018 | Docket: 6326614

Cited 5 times | Published

brought pursuant to the FCRA, more specifically, section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes (2016), which states:

Arnold v. Heartland Dental, LLC

101 F. Supp. 3d 1220, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40340, 2015 WL 1456661

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2015 | Docket: 64301741

Cited 5 times | Published

Heartland for sex discrimination in violation of section 760.10 of the Florida Statutes, or the Florida Civil

Donovan v. Broward County Bd. of Com'rs

974 So. 2d 458, 2008 WL 183397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2008 | Docket: 1717244

Cited 5 times | Published

manner in an investigation under this section. § 760.10(7), Fla. Stat. (2007). The EEOC, to which Florida

Natson v. Eckerd Corp., Inc.

885 So. 2d 945, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15889, 2004 WL 2390023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2004 | Docket: 1685317

Cited 5 times | Published

violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2002). The court granted

Daniels v. State

837 So. 2d 1008, 2002 WL 31695823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 537544

Cited 5 times | Published

prohibits age discrimination in employment. See, e.g., § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (2001). However, such legislation

Pashoian v. GTE DIRECTORIES

208 F. Supp. 2d 1293, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12194, 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,133, 2002 WL 1447931

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2002 | Docket: 1500405

Cited 5 times | Published

Civil Rights Act of 1992, Florida Statutes, Section 760.10(7). The following factual allegations are taken

Tourville v. Securex, Inc.

769 So. 2d 491, 2000 WL 1532864

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 1739109

Cited 5 times | Published

discharge of Tourville was not unlawful under section 760.10(8)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), since his hospitalization

Joshua v. City of Gainesville

734 So. 2d 1068, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4622, 1999 WL 71523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1999 | Docket: 1731047

Cited 5 times | Published

finding her claim to be time-barred pursuant to section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1995), and dismissing her

Bogle v. Orange County Board of County Commissioners

162 F.3d 653, 42 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 380, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 30967, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,671, 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1081

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 9, 1998 | Docket: 395049

Cited 5 times | Published

the ADEA and Florida’s Human Rights law, Fla. Stat. 760.10. Before trial, the district court denied Orange

Villanueva v. City of Fort Pierce, Fla.

24 F. Supp. 2d 1364, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17490, 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1617, 1998 WL 764791

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1998 | Docket: 2352564

Cited 5 times | Published

City under Florida's Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10 (1998) ("FCRA"). The Eleventh Circuit has held

Albert v. National Cash Register Co.

874 F. Supp. 1328, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20834, 1994 WL 745661

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1994 | Docket: 961261

Cited 5 times | Published

the Florida Human Rights Act, Florida Statutes § 760.10. Joint Scheduling and Status Report, pp. 1-2 [D

Dykes v. Quincy Telephone Co.

539 So. 2d 503, 1989 WL 12444

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1989 | Docket: 452812

Cited 5 times | Published

circuit court, pursuant to the authority of section 760.10(12), allowing an aggrieved party to bring an

St. Louis v. Florida International University

60 So. 3d 455, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4356, 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1800, 2011 WL 1135359

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2011 | Docket: 60300221

Cited 4 times | Published

individual ... because of such individual’s race ....”§ 760.10(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004). It is well settled that

Valenzuela v. Globeground North America, LLC

18 So. 3d 17, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11586, 2009 WL 2513875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2009 | Docket: 1640263

Cited 4 times | Published

employment, because of such individual's... sex." § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). Because the FCRA is

Carsillo v. City of Lake Worth

995 So. 2d 1118, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 18071, 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 672, 2008 WL 5070282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2008 | Docket: 1685080

Cited 4 times | Published

Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA) provides in section 760.10: It is an unlawful employment practice for

Yoder Bros., Inc. v. Weygant

973 So. 2d 625, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 785, 2008 WL 199897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2008 | Docket: 1292699

Cited 4 times | Published

SALCINES and WALLACE, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (2004).

Masso v. Miami-Dade County

465 F. Supp. 2d 1260, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89600, 2006 WL 3615153

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2006 | Docket: 2303637

Cited 4 times | Published

VII") and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10 ("FCRA").[1] In April of 2004, Plaintiff filed

First Union Nat. Bank of Fla. v. Ruiz

785 So. 2d 589, 2001 WL 359677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2001 | Docket: 450315

Cited 4 times | Published

under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), section 760.10, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center

135 F. Supp. 2d 1198, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2484

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2001 | Docket: 2370472

Cited 4 times | Published

immunity from suit in federal court. While Fla. Stat. § 760.10 applies on its face to governmental entities or

Goldsmith v. Jackson Memorial Hospital Public Health Trust

33 F. Supp. 2d 1336, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21725, 1998 WL 966004

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1998 | Docket: 1922449

Cited 4 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA"), Fla.Stat. § 760.10 et seq. Dr. Goldsmith alleges that the Hospital

Paldano v. Althin Medical, Inc.

974 F. Supp. 1441, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21066, 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 399, 1996 WL 913071

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1996 | Docket: 1617032

Cited 4 times | Published

are also time-barred. To assert a claim under § 760.10, Plaintiff must first have filed a charge of discrimination

Snair v. City of Clearwater

787 F. Supp. 1401, 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1040, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3530, 1992 WL 59028

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1992 | Docket: 1793547

Cited 4 times | Published

Statutes § 112.044 (1991). [11] Florida Statutes § 760.10 (1991). [12] "Deferral states" are those which

Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

516 So. 2d 1148, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 3, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1987 WL 3174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1987 | Docket: 1677894

Cited 4 times | Published

Hullinger sued Ryder, alleging a violation of section 760.10, Florida Statutes, in that he had been wrongfully

Buade v. Terra Group

259 So. 3d 219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2018 | Docket: 8146143

Cited 3 times | Published

two-count complaint alleging a violation of section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2017), for sex discrimination

Scott v. Sarasota Doctors Hospital, Inc.

145 F. Supp. 3d 1114, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150408, 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,441, 2015 WL 6750849

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2015 | Docket: 64305403

Cited 3 times | Published

origin. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e 2(a)(1); Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1). A plaintiff may establish a prima facie case

Delva v. Continental Group, Inc.

96 So. 3d 956, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11966, 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1123, 2012 WL 3022986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2012 | Docket: 60311603

Cited 3 times | Published

case is whether the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.10, Florida Statute,1 prohibits discrimination

Blizzard v. APPLIANCE DIRECT, INC.

16 So. 3d 922, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10978, 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 197, 2009 WL 2407685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2009 | Docket: 1641121

Cited 3 times | Published

harassment and retaliation in accordance with section 760.10, Florida Statutes. Because we conclude that

Carter v. HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES

989 So. 2d 1258, 2008 WL 4180337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2008 | Docket: 1665451

Cited 3 times | Published

Carter's complaint, we will briefly review section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes (2006), the FCRA's retaliation

Patterson v. CONSUMER DEBT MANAGEMENT

975 So. 2d 1290, 2008 WL 724180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2008 | Docket: 1423366

Cited 3 times | Published

national origin, age, handicap, or marital status. § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1992). "Employer" is further

Leola Bradshaw v. School Board of Broward Co.

486 F.3d 1205, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11354, 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,839, 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1083, 2007 WL 1412570

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 15, 2007 | Docket: 398908

Cited 3 times | Published

almost perfectly, compare Fla. Stat. § 760.10(a)(1) with 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1)

Duffy v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

414 F. Supp. 2d 1133, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3748, 2006 WL 229503

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2006 | Docket: 2323255

Cited 3 times | Published

to the provisions of the FCRA, specifically section 760.10 which is entitled "Unlawful employment practices

Paraohao v. Bankers Club, Inc.

225 F. Supp. 2d 1353, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19489, 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 28, 2002 WL 31247359

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2002 | Docket: 2432658

Cited 3 times | Published

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Section 760.10 of the Florida Civil Right Act, as well as

Stone v. First Union Corp.

203 F.R.D. 532, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16776, 2001 WL 1217309

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2001 | Docket: 66015098

Cited 3 times | Published

discrimination in employment provisions of Florida Statutes § 760.10. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant

Jones v. Brummer

766 So. 2d 1107, 2000 WL 1153990

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2000 | Docket: 1329624

Cited 3 times | Published

unlawful employment practices under the Act. See § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (unlawful employment practices); §

Greene v. Loewenstein, Inc.

99 F. Supp. 2d 1373, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10353, 2000 WL 775305

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2000 | Docket: 2134728

Cited 3 times | Published

Civil Rights Act of 1992 ("FCRA"), Fla. Stat. § 760.10 et seq. *1376 In July 1984, Lowenstein hired Greene

Russell Kaufman v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

122 F.3d 892, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22847, 1997 WL 533783

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 29, 1997 | Docket: 956682

Cited 3 times | Published

under the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10, for the same conduct alleged in Counts Two and

Fernandez v. Community Asphalt, Inc.

934 F. Supp. 418, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15887, 1996 WL 444572

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 24, 1996 | Docket: 1780013

Cited 3 times | Published

("FLSA") (Count IV); violations of Fla Stat.Ann. § 760.10 (Counts I & II); and violations of Florida common

Kraft v. Bechtel Power Corporation

483 So. 2d 56, 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 271, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 293, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1986 | Docket: 2577497

Cited 3 times | Published

plaintiff's diabetes was a "handicap" under section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), which forbids

Housing Authority v. Billingslea

464 So. 2d 1221, 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1985 | Docket: 1661276

Cited 3 times | Published

jurisdiction in such matters to the Commission. Section 760.10 provides, in pertinent part: (1) It is an unlawful

Thomas v. Seminole Elec. Coop., Inc.

385 F. Supp. 3d 1246

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2018 | Docket: 64324879

Cited 2 times | Published

to discriminate on the basis of sex. Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a). Claims under the FCRA are analyzed under

Diaz v. Florida

219 F. Supp. 3d 1207, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153424, 2016 WL 6565935

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2016 | Docket: 64311314

Cited 2 times | Published

(citing *121542 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1); Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a))). Evidence of discrimination may be either

City of Delray Beach v. DeSisto

197 So. 3d 1206, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11109, 2016 WL 3911373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 60256175

Cited 2 times | Published

violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”). § 760.10(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). The matter proceeded

Hamilton v. Sheridan Healthcorp Inc.

602 F. App'x 485

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 3, 2015 | Docket: 65959623

Cited 2 times | Published

was patterned after Title. VII. See Fla. Stat. § 760.10(7); Harper v. Blockbuster Entm’t Corp., 139 F

Peguy Delva v. The Continental Group, Inc.

137 So. 3d 371, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 246, 2014 WL 1491497, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1316, 122 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 707

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2014 | Docket: 795786

Cited 2 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), section 760.10, Florida Statutes, that makes it “an unlawful

Chavez v. URS Federal Technical Services, Inc.

504 F. App'x 819

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 3, 2013 | Docket: 65702994

Cited 2 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1). Ms. Chavez contends that URS’ proffered reason

Carper v. TWC SERVICES, INC.

820 F. Supp. 2d 1339, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118691, 2011 WL 5101572

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2011 | Docket: 1966794

Cited 2 times | Published

age, handicap, or marital status. Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a). Because the FCRA is nearly identical to

Kavanaugh v. Miami-Dade County

775 F. Supp. 2d 1361, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39536, 2011 WL 1319023

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2011 | Docket: 2337612

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA"), Fla. Stat. § 760.10 (2009).[1] [DE 1]. Plaintiff alleged job discrimination

Byrd v. BT FOODS, INC.

26 So. 3d 600, 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1445, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18431, 2009 WL 4282945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2009 | Docket: 239434

Cited 2 times | Published

violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.10(l)(a);3 and (3) intentional infliction of emotional

Verna v. Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County

539 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 2008 WL 821651

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2008 | Docket: 2020878

Cited 2 times | Published

age, handicap, or marital status." Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a). A claim of discrimination under the FCRA[13]

SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA, LLC v. Dupont

955 So. 2d 533, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 124, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 572, 2007 WL 1012884

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2007 | Docket: 1185688

Cited 2 times | Published

1964, the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1997). See Speedway SuperAmerica

Wallace v. Public Health Trust of Dade County

370 F. Supp. 2d 1247, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14358, 2005 WL 1330652

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 2392811

Cited 2 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act, Florida Statute Section 760.10 ("FCRA"), for racial discrimination and retaliation

Bruner v. GC-GW, INC.

880 So. 2d 1244, 2004 WL 1920012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2004 | Docket: 1689251

Cited 2 times | Published

is misplaced, and its argument is meritless. Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2000), makes it an

Prieto v. City of Miami Beach

190 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5505, 2002 WL 378313

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2002 | Docket: 2371132

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), Fla. Stat. § 760.10, et seq.[1] Specifically, the plaintiffs, two

Donato v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.

146 F.3d 1329, 1998 WL 412955

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 23, 1998 | Docket: 1068918

Cited 2 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act, Florida Statutes § 760.10, for marital status discrimination in employment

Mason v. K Mart Corp.

1 F. Supp. 2d 1333, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5217, 1998 WL 181961

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1998 | Docket: 2435594

Cited 2 times | Published

this section." (Dkt. 6 at 8 (quoting Fla. Stat. § 760.10(7))). Finally, Defendant asserts that since Plaintiff

Thevenin v. Baptist Health Systems of South Florida, Inc.

931 F. Supp. 856, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10061, 1996 WL 417606

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1996 | Docket: 2175887

Cited 2 times | Published

I); the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla.Stat. 760.10 (Count II); and Metropolitan Dade County Code

Williams v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SANFORD, FLA.

709 F. Supp. 1554, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,213, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16033, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1540

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1988 | Docket: 1154908

Cited 2 times | Published

Director by SHA in violation of Florida Statutes, section 760.10(1). The January 20, 1986 recommended order

Stephen v. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute Lifetime Cancer Screening Center, Inc.

259 F. Supp. 3d 1323

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 3, 2017 | Docket: 64314629

Cited 1 times | Published

discrimination on the basis of race. See Fla. Stat. § 760.10; Grant v. Miami-Dade Cty. Water & Sewer Dep’t

Vaughn Usher v. Nipro Diabetes Systems, Inc., and Nipro Medical Corporation

184 So. 3d 1260, 2016 WL 717917

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2016 | Docket: 3038769

Cited 1 times | Published

We also find that Usher stated a claim under section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009). He pleaded

Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc. v. Fouche

145 So. 3d 151, 2014 WL 2781817, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9340

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2014 | Docket: 60242635

Cited 1 times | Published

130(a)(3)(C)(iv). . See 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2012). . See § 760.10, Fla. Stat. (2012). . See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2

Dr. Emanuel Kontos, D.M.D., P.A. v. Menz

136 So. 3d 714, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2026, 2014 WL 562930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2014 | Docket: 60240068

Cited 1 times | Published

practice, essentially tracks the language of section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes (2009). After an evidentiary

Mitchell v. Palm Beach County School Board

127 So. 3d 707, 2013 WL 6081865, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2013 | Docket: 60236826

Cited 1 times | Published

according to the date contained in the complaint. See § 760.10(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). FCHR requested and received

Mattingly v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees

931 F. Supp. 2d 1176, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36201, 2013 WL 1099804

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2013 | Docket: 65989611

Cited 1 times | Published

such individual’s ... handicap.... ” Fla. Stat. § 760.10. Because the FCRA is patterned after the ADA,

Wright v. Sandestin Investments, LLC

914 F. Supp. 2d 1273, 2012 WL 6194872, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175837, 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1533

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2012 | Docket: 65987579

Cited 1 times | Published

state law, see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k), Fla. Stat. § 760.10, and violation of the Family and Medical Leave

Gossard v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.

612 F. Supp. 2d 1242, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22125, 2009 WL 762215

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2009 | Docket: 2361675

Cited 1 times | Published

of only the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. St. § 760.10(1)(a), (1-7) (hereinafter "FCRA"). Counts I and

Haines City HMA, Inc. v. Carter

948 So. 2d 904, 2007 WL 428897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2007 | Docket: 1773701

Cited 1 times | Published

FULMER, C.J. and DAVIS, J., Concur. NOTES [1] § 760.10(7), Fla. Stat. (2003). [2] "In cases in which

Jian-Jian Ren v. University of Central Florida Board of Trustees

390 F. Supp. 2d 1223, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18342, 2005 WL 1631820

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2005 | Docket: 37509

Cited 1 times | Published

's Ex. O at 3. [10] See Def.'s Ex. Q. [11] Section 760.10(7) of the FCRA mirrors Title VII. The statute

Stone v. First Union Corp.

216 F.R.D. 540, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13625, 2003 WL 21850449

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2003 | Docket: 66019119

Cited 1 times | Published

in employment provisions of Florida Statutes, § 760.10. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant

Ellsworth v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners

780 So. 2d 903, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 95, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 331, 2001 WL 169598

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2001 | Docket: 64804408

Cited 1 times | Published

that discriminatory action has occurred. . See § 760.10(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). . Section 760.11(5)

Digiro v. Pall Aeropower Corp.

19 F. Supp. 2d 1304, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16200, 1998 WL 730163

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1998 | Docket: 2394497

Cited 1 times | Published

is liable to Plaintiff for willfully violating § 760.10(1)(a) of the *1308 Florida Statutes, also referred

Henderson v. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.

884 F. Supp. 499, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6016, 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1462, 1995 WL 262888

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1995 | Docket: 934305

Cited 1 times | Published

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FLA.STAT. § 760.10 CLAIM FOR COMPENSATORY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES and

LABORERS'INTERN, L. 478 v. Burroughs

522 So. 2d 852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1988 | Docket: 1660861

Cited 1 times | Published

national origin, age, handicap, or marital status. § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). The Dade County ordinance

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

652 F. Supp. 113, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21614, 42 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1485

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1986 | Docket: 2153143

Cited 1 times | Published

when a complaint is filed with that state agency. § 760.10(10), Fla.Stat. (1983); Fla.Adm. C.R. 22T-9.01(2)

Katie Kiernan v. ReviveMD305, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2025 | Docket: 70260660

Published

2 section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2021). She later amended

Tony Roberson v. City of Pompano Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2025 | Docket: 69674474

Published

. because of such individual’s race . . . .” § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2021). Because our Florida

Honeyfund.Com Inc v. Governor, State of Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 4, 2024 | Docket: 66668435

Published

Argued: Aug 24, 2023

mandatory workplace trainings.1 Fla. Stat. § 760.10(8)(a). The Act says employers cannot subject

WILFRED W. RAMOS, JR. v. STEAK N SHAKE, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2023 | Docket: 68103410

Published

Mitzel, 83 So. 3d 865, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); see § 760.10. And "[s]ection 760.11 establishes administrative

Mary E. Harris v. The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 4, 2023 | Docket: 66760582

Published

Argued: Jan 25, 2023

U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1); see Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a). 2 In assessing an empl

Ruby Green v. Howard Finkelstein

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 17, 2023 | Docket: 66749216

Published

Argued: Jan 20, 2023

Unlawful Employment Practices, Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a) (2023). Likewise, the Supreme Court

AISY ALEU, PHARM. D. v. NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2023 | Docket: 66814493

Published

section. 3 § 760.10(1)(a)-(b), (7), Fla. Stat. (2015). The employer

Carolina Rose Matamoros v. Broward Sheriffs Office

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 25, 2021 | Docket: 60015169

Published

Date Filed: 06/25/2021 Page: 2 of 20 § 760.10(1)(a). Carolina Matamoros alleged that her former

CHERELLDA BRANCH-MCKENZIE v. BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

254 So. 3d 1007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2018 | Docket: 7863704

Published

assert a claim for sexual harassment under section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2003).” Maldonado v. Publix

Jackson v. Kleen 1, LLC

238 So. 3d 378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2017 | Docket: 6244878

Published

judgment granting directed verdict. Section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes (2016) provides:

Lin v. Demings

219 So. 3d 124, 2017 WL 1534824, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5943

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2017 | Docket: 6058986

Published

W., Senior Judge, concur. 1 . § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). 2 . Because

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—report No. 16-01

214 So. 3d 552

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2017 | Docket: 4669815

Published

2. This instruction is based upon F.S. 760.10(1), which makes it an unlawful employment

Lindamood v. Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation

630 F. App'x 904

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 27, 2015 | Docket: 65961302

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.10(l)(a).1 The district court’s grant of summary

Candina v. University of Miami

185 F. Supp. 3d 1343, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183002, 2015 WL 12777989

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2015 | Docket: 64308686

Published

corresponding Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.10 et seq. (“FCRA”) due to discrimination based on

Hellwege v. Tampa Family Health Centers

103 F. Supp. 3d 1303, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47102, 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1613, 2015 WL 1608827

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2015 | Docket: 64301919

Published

U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a); see also Fla. Stat. Ann. § 760.10(l)(a).6 TFHC argues that Hellwege “fails to allege

Tillis v. Sheriff of Indian River County

603 F. App'x 851

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 10, 2015 | Docket: 65959686

Published

and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10 (FCRA). They allege that Loar discriminated against

Margolis v. Public Health Trust

89 F. Supp. 3d 1343, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26432, 2015 WL 853059

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2015 | Docket: 64300731

Published

individual because of such individual’s age. Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a). To establish a prima facie case of age

Gaberlavage v. Miami-Dade County

160 So. 3d 477, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2557, 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 556, 2015 WL 799148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2015 | Docket: 2636922

Published

under the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2006). We affirm. I. Facts

Granera v. Sedano's Supermarket 31

153 So. 3d 960, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20402, 2014 WL 7156856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2014 | Docket: 2616010

Published

violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2011). Sedano’s filed

Stanley v. Great Glam, Inc.

161 So. 3d 457, 2014 WL 2601610, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2014 | Docket: 60247157

Published

issue of law in this case turns on whether section 760.10(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), prohibits discrimination

Smith v. Miami-Dade County

21 F. Supp. 3d 1286, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72781, 2014 WL 2139248

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2014 | Docket: 64295108

Published

act. 42 U.S.C. § 12112 and § 12132; Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1). “Disability” is defined as: (1) a physical

Fuller v. Edward B. Stimpson Co.

971 F. Supp. 2d 1146, 2013 WL 4710863, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124545

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2013 | Docket: 65994279

Published

I), and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.10(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (Count III), that he was retaliated

Glass v. Captain Katanna's, Inc.

950 F. Supp. 2d 1235, 2013 WL 3017010, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87179, 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1540

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2013 | Docket: 65991882

Published

30, 2013)(quoting 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1)); § 760.10(1)(a) Fla. Stat. (2012). Pursuant to the Pregnancy

Crowley v. OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC

907 F. Supp. 2d 1318, 2012 WL 6025605, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172012, 116 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1349

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2012 | Docket: 65986775

Published

discriminate against an employee based on age. Fla. Stat. 760.10(l)(a). Claims of age discrimination *1323under

Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 09-01 re Turner

76 So. 3d 898, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 655, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2754, 2011 WL 5600074

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2011 | Docket: 60304599

Published

hostile work environment in violation of Fla. Stat. § 760.10 and Canons 1 and 2A of the Code of Judicial Conduct

Dulaney v. Miami-Dade County

785 F. Supp. 2d 1343, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57436, 2011 WL 1900717

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 5, 2011 | Docket: 1996246

Published

age, handicap, or marital status." FLA. STAT. § 760.10(1).[12] *1353 The ADA defines "disability" as

Eliuth M. Alvarez v. Royal Atlantic Developers

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 2, 2010 | Docket: 2907180

Published

Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a); and (4) retaliation in violation of Fla. Stat. § 760.10(7).8 She alleged

Feizi v. Department of Management Services

988 So. 2d 1192, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12089, 2008 WL 3286213

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2008 | Docket: 64855555

Published

unlawful employment practices in violation of section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2005). For the benefit of

St. Johns County School Dist. v. O'Brien

973 So. 2d 535, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20540, 2007 WL 4545876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2007 | Docket: 1687982

Published

claimed a violation of the FCRA pursuant to section 760.10. On 18 July 2005, the FCHR issued a "no cause"

Anderson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

506 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17979, 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,851, 2007 WL 788810

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2007 | Docket: 2378308

Published

Civil Rights Act of 1992 ("FCRA"), Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a).[1] The Amended Complaint states that Plaintiff

Burke-Fowler v. Orange County, Florida

390 F. Supp. 2d 1208, 2005 WL 1571886

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2005 | Docket: 37469

Published

Plaintiff alleges that the County violated section 760.10, Florida Statutes, because her marital status

Scelta v. Delicatessen Support Services, Inc.

146 F. Supp. 2d 1255

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 25, 2001 | Docket: 2203962

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA"), Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1), and Title VII, 42 U.S.C.2000e-2(a), as well

Williams v. School Board of Palm Beach County

770 So. 2d 706, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13205, 2000 WL 1505087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2000 | Docket: 64801527

Published

in an age discrimination case brought under section 760.10(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). Following the

Mandeville v. City of Coral Gables

50 F. Supp. 2d 1320, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9479, 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,246, 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 811, 1999 WL 427990

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1999 | Docket: 161636

Published

Civil Rights Act of 1992 ("FCRA"), Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1) — by removing her as Commander of the FTP,

Bogle v. Orange County Board

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 9, 1998 | Docket: 395048

Published

4 Fla. Stat. 760.10. Before trial, the district court denied Orange

Donato v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

146 F.3d 1329, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 16868, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,414, 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 495

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 23, 1998 | Docket: 8857

Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act, Florida Statutes § 760.10, for marital status discrimination in employment

Williams v. Vitro Services Corp.

144 F.3d 1438, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,632, 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 297, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 14849, 1998 WL 349557

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 1, 1998 | Docket: 212034

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 760.10. The district court determined that Williams had

Williams v. Vitro Services Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 1, 1998 | Docket: 820454

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 760.10 . The district court determined that Williams

Parise v. Delta Airlines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 28, 1998 | Docket: 1118741

Published

The action was filed pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a) and 42 U.S.C. § 1984.1 Delta removed the

Parise v. Delta Airlines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 28, 1998 | Docket: 1279761

Published

age. The action was filed pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 760.10(1)(a) and 42 U.S.C. § 1984.1 Delta removed the

BAY COUNTY SCHOOL BD. v. Bryan

679 So. 2d 1246, 1996 WL 511524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1996 | Docket: 1665933

Published

evaluations done by appellants were in violation of section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). Appellant Bay

Kemp v. Monge

919 F. Supp. 404, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6686, 1996 WL 121146

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1996 | Docket: 1148087

Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla.Stat. § 760.10, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to accommodate

Williams v. Eckerd Family Youth Alternative

903 F. Supp. 1515, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15230, 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 301, 1995 WL 608179

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1995 | Docket: 66000468

Published

amended, and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.10, Fla.Stat. (1993). In order for Plaintiffs to

Honig v. Florida Commission on Human Relations

659 So. 2d 1236, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9002, 1995 WL 502096

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1995 | Docket: 64758555

Published

employment, to housing, and to AIDS victims. Section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1991), describes unlawful

Department of Education v. Rushton

638 So. 2d 100, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4693, 1994 WL 190021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1994 | Docket: 64749063

Published

Relations awarding attorney’s fees pursuant to section 760.10(13), Florida Statutes (1985),1 to the attorneys

Snair v. City of Clearwater

846 F. Supp. 62, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2821, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,294, 1994 WL 76689

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1994 | Docket: 65989388

Published

1977 (FHRA). See Fla. Stat. § 112.044; Fla.Stat. § 760.10. *64In 1945, the Florida Legislature created a

Pillis v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

837 F. Supp. 418, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17015, 1993 WL 498839

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1993 | Docket: 65987360

Published

and an unlawful employment practice under Florida Statute 760.10(l)(a) (1991). Subsequently, Defendants

Snair v. City of Clearwater

817 F. Supp. 108, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4009, 1993 WL 94333

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1993 | Docket: 1022372

Published

1977 (FHRA). See Fla. Stat. § 112.044; Fla.Stat. § 760.10. In 1945, the Florida Legislature created a mandatory

Farancz v. St. Mary's Hospital, Inc.

585 So. 2d 1151, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9125, 1991 WL 181523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1991 | Docket: 64661608

Published

appellant’s claim of employment discrimination under section 760.10, Florida Statutes. St. Mary’s withdrew its

Blackburn v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.

587 So. 2d 506, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9357, 1991 WL 185205

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1991 | Docket: 64662273

Published

discrimination against Ms. Blackburij in violation of Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1987).3 I therefore

Department of Corrections v. Chandler

582 So. 2d 1183, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 779, 1991 WL 10405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1991 | Docket: 64660310

Published

discrimination based upon this incident, pursuant to Section 760.10(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1985). The DOC primarily

Department of Corrections v. Ratliff

552 So. 2d 302, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2672, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6421, 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1895, 1989 WL 137750

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1989 | Docket: 64646345

Published

an unlawful employment practice pursuant to section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1987). Count II alleged

Davidson Drugs, Inc. v. Harrison

546 So. 2d 432, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1469, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3409, 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1989 | Docket: 64643756

Published

C. § 626, and the Florida Human Rights Act, section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1987). We have carefully

Solomon v. Department of Transp.

541 So. 2d 691, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 741, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1530, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1890, 1989 WL 26749

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1989 | Docket: 470626

Published

authority to directly enforce federal law, since section 760.10, Florida Statutes, prohibits dismissal of an

Lavery v. Dept. of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles

523 So. 2d 696, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 864, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1313, 1988 WL 28299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1988 | Docket: 1517218

Published

DCA 1984); 29 U.S.C.A. § 706(8)(A) (Supp. 1987); § 760.10(8)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985); and (e) while we recognize

Touron v. Dade County

119 F.R.D. 41, 1988 WL 8969

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1988 | Docket: 66299662

Published

and 4, and Florida Statutes section 760.10, Fla.Stat.Ann. section 760.10 (West 1986). The state court

Conklin Center v. Williams

519 So. 2d 38, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 3, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11694, 1987 WL 3166

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1987 | Docket: 64632176

Published

improper, the attorney fee award, based on section 760.10(13), Florida Statutes (1985), cannot stand

Duval County School Board v. State, Dept. of Administration

500 So. 2d 158, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1335, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8325, 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,569, 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1986 | Docket: 64624084

Published

alleging an unlawful employment practice under Section 760.10, Florida Statutes. He claimed that he was not

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 22, 1986 | Docket: 3258151

Published

reason or reasons for adopting such a policy. Section 760.10(1), F.S., declares that it is an unlawful employment

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jun 26, 1984 | Docket: 3258355

Published

entitled to specified retirement benefits. Section 760.10, F.S. (formerly s 23.167, F.S. 1981, and s