Florida Statute 760.1 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLIV
CIVIL RIGHTS

Chapter 760
DISCRIMINATION IN THE TREATMENT OF PERSONS; MINORITY REPRESENTATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 760.01

760.01 Purposes; construction; title.—

(1) Sections 760.01-760.11 and 509.092 shall be cited as the “Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992.”

(2) The general purposes of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 are to secure for all individuals within the state freedom from discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status and thereby to protect their interest in personal dignity, to make available to the state their full productive capacities, to secure the state against domestic strife and unrest, to preserve the public safety, health, and general welfare, and to promote the interests, rights, and privileges of individuals within the state.

(3) The Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 shall be construed according to the fair import of its terms and shall be liberally construed to further the general purposes stated in this section and the special purposes of the particular provision involved.

History.—s. 1, ch. 69-287; s. 1, ch. 72-48; s. 1, ch. 77-341; s. 1, ch. 92-177; s. 4, ch. 92-282; s. 2, ch. 2015-68.

Note.—Former ss. 13.201, 23.161.

F.S. 760.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 760.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 760.01

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 760.01

Total Results: 158

Adem A. Albra v. Advan, Inc.

490 F.3d 826, 68 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 241, 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 680, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15175, 2007 WL 1814677

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 26, 2007 | Docket: 474837

Cited 643 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.01-760.10, provides that it is an unlawful employment

Lea Cordoba v. Dillard's Inc.

419 F.3d 1169, 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1774, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16082, 2 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 12, 2005 WL 1838530

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 4, 2005 | Docket: 687760

Cited 425 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. In February 2003, the district

Holly v. Clairson Industries, L.L.C.

492 F.3d 1247, 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 865, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 17151, 2007 WL 2050769

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 2007 | Docket: 320973

Cited 356 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 ("FCRA"). After seventeen years of strong work

Pintando v. Miami-Dade Housing Agency

501 F.3d 1241, 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,956, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22676, 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1131

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 25, 2007 | Docket: 399012

Cited 180 times | Published

(2) Florida's Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 760.01, et seq.; and (3) Title VII of the Civil Rights

Joshua v. City of Gainesville

768 So. 2d 432, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 641, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1751, 2000 WL 1227755

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2000 | Docket: 629162

Cited 107 times | Published

in favor of granting access to the remedy). Section 760.01(2) outlines the general purposes of the Act

Cris D'Angelo v. Conagra Foods, Inc.

422 F.3d 1220, 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1825, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 18639, 31 NDLR 28

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 30, 2005 | Docket: 1118875

Cited 104 times | Published

provisions of the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq.2 Soon thereafter, ConAgra moved for summary

Sandy Cuddeback v. FL Board of Education

381 F.3d 1230, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18050, 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,721, 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 538, 2004 WL 1896891

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 25, 2004 | Docket: 789817

Cited 97 times | Published

violated the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01. On appeal, however, she does not *1232

Woodham v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Fla., Inc.

829 So. 2d 891, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 834, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1967, 2002 WL 31259952

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2002 | Docket: 2451040

Cited 87 times | Published

national origin, age, handicap, or marital status." § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1999). The Legislature has specifically

Donato v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.

767 So. 2d 1146, 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1302

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2000 | Docket: 1193997

Cited 42 times | Published

13.201, Fla. Stat. (1977)) (current version at § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1997) (Civil Rights Act of 1992))

Slater v. Energy Services Group International, Inc.

634 F.3d 1326, 78 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1268, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4591, 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1185, 2011 WL 782023

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 8, 2011 | Docket: 92872

Cited 38 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. (FCRA), and the Florida Whistleblower

Maggio v. Fla. Dept. of Labor & Emp. SEC.

899 So. 2d 1074, 2005 WL 673677

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2005 | Docket: 757462

Cited 33 times | Published

the Act and the particular provisions involved. § 760.01(3), Fla. Stat. (2003); see also Woodham v. Blue

Florida State University v. Sondel

685 So. 2d 923, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13591, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,927, 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1001, 1996 WL 720617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1996 | Docket: 1735211

Cited 30 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as stated in section 760.01(2), Florida Statutes, are to secure for all

Brand v. Florida Power Corp.

633 So. 2d 504, 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 102, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1695, 1994 WL 64952

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1994 | Docket: 1708063

Cited 26 times | Published

to the state their full productive capacities." § 760.01(2) Fla. Stat. (1989). Indeed, the Florida Constitution

Schwertfager v. City of Boynton Beach

42 F. Supp. 2d 1347, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4592, 1999 WL 199512

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1999 | Docket: 260574

Cited 21 times | Published

violations of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.01, et seq., Fla.Stat. [2] The timeline created

Salmon v. Dade County School Board

4 F. Supp. 2d 1157, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6632, 1998 WL 234585

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1998 | Docket: 2179339

Cited 18 times | Published

et seq., and the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.01, Fla. Stat., alleging that the defendant failed

Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC v. Dupont

933 So. 2d 75, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8251, 98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 459, 2006 WL 1458929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 1711943

Cited 17 times | Published

to coworker harassment claims under the Act. Section 760.01(3) provides that the Act "shall be construed

Hudson v. International Computer Negotiations, Inc.

499 F.3d 1252, 2007 WL 2693505

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 17, 2007 | Docket: 2028737

Cited 15 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. ("FCRA"), and § 510 of the Employee Retirement

Shuttleworth v. Broward County

639 F. Supp. 654, 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 925, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23064, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,308, 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 406

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1986 | Docket: 1341204

Cited 15 times | Published

Ct.App.1985) (Florida Human Rights Act of 1977, § 760.01-760.10, exists as an additional remedy against

Sandra Sheridan v. State of Florida, Department of Health

182 So. 3d 787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2016 | Docket: 3025960

Cited 14 times | Published

national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.” § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2012). By its express terms, the

Richard Samson v. Federal Express Corporation

746 F.3d 1196, 29 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 771, 2014 WL 1226847, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5506

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 26, 2014 | Docket: 159010

Cited 12 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. In 2009, FedEx offered Samson, an experienced

Smith v. Health Center of Lake City, Inc.

252 F. Supp. 2d 1336, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3801, 2003 WL 1191922

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2003 | Docket: 2296892

Cited 12 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (the "FCRA"), section 760.01 et seq., Florida Statutes" (Doc. 2). On August

Resley v. Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co.

989 F. Supp. 1442, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21168, 1997 WL 811562

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1997 | Docket: 1075049

Cited 12 times | Published

("Title VII"), the Florida Civil Rights Act, F.S. § 760.01 et seq., and Florida's private sector "whistleblower"

Sanders v. Mayor's Jewelers, Inc.

942 F. Supp. 571, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14223, 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,654, 76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 355, 1996 WL 550129

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1996 | Docket: 1247485

Cited 12 times | Published

claims (DE# 100) is DENIED. NOTES [1] Fla.Stat. § 760.01(3) states: "The Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992

Blinn v. Florida Dept. of Transportation

781 So. 2d 1103, 2000 WL 1880213

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 1690584

Cited 11 times | Published

et seq., and the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.01, Florida Statutes.[2] In the complaint, appellant

Trumbull v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

756 F. Supp. 532, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1666, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,588, 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 750, 1991 WL 16677

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1991 | Docket: 2135246

Cited 11 times | Published

the Florida Human Rights Act of 1977, Fla.Stat. § 760.01 et seq. ("FHRA"), charging defendant with discrimination

Turrie Webb v. Worldwide Flight Services

407 F.3d 1192, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7533, 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,923, 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1148, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 479

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 2005 | Docket: 398316

Cited 10 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq., 1 the defendant/appellant

MacLean v. City of St. Petersburg

194 F. Supp. 2d 1290, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5275, 2002 WL 480903

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2002 | Docket: 2475725

Cited 10 times | Published

Civil Rights Act of 1992, Florida Statutes, Section 760.01, et seq.; and that Defendant violated her constitutional

Brown v. Walt Disney World Co.

805 F. Supp. 1554, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20731, 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 121, 1992 WL 328648

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1992 | Docket: 241735

Cited 10 times | Published

the Florida Human Rights Act, Florida Statutes § 760.01 et seq., and a claim of intentional infliction

Morrow v. Duval County School Bd.

514 So. 2d 1086, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,881

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1987 | Docket: 2517163

Cited 10 times | Published

section 2, of the Florida Constitution.[*]Cf. § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). One year prior to enacting

Cisko v. Phoenix Medical Products, Inc.

797 So. 2d 11, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10625, 2001 WL 844675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2001 | Docket: 1714827

Cited 8 times | Published

thirtyfive-day restriction in section 760.11(7). Under section 760.01(3), Florida Statutes (1997), "[t]he Florida

Green v. Burger King Corp.

728 So. 2d 369, 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 161, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3425, 1999 WL 157251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1999 | Docket: 1673871

Cited 8 times | Published

reprinted in 1964 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2391, _, with § 760.01, Fla. Stat. (1995). Accordingly, we turn to the

Hazel v. School Bd. of Dade County, Fla.

7 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8477, 1998 WL 310714

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 8, 1998 | Docket: 2257439

Cited 8 times | Published

is a violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act. § 760.01 et seq. The School Board argues that this Count

Fromm-Vane v. Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc.

995 F. Supp. 1471, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22085, 1997 WL 854500

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1997 | Docket: 2517587

Cited 8 times | Published

under the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. Federal law is applicable to claims arising

Shedrick v. District Board of Trustees of Miami-Dade College

941 F. Supp. 2d 1348, 2013 WL 1748789, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57947

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2013 | Docket: 65990856

Cited 7 times | Published

and the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. 760.01, et seq. (Counts I and IV); discriminated

Thompson v. Orange Lake Country Club, Inc.

224 F. Supp. 2d 1368, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17858, 2002 WL 31104011

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2002 | Docket: 2357696

Cited 7 times | Published

discrimination alleged by Thompson. See Fla. Stat. § 760.01. In order to maintain a cause of action under

Quick v. Tripp, Scott, Conklin & Smith, P.A.

43 F. Supp. 2d 1357, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5529, 1999 WL 228745

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1999 | Docket: 2295359

Cited 7 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla.Stat. § 760.01, et seq. (the "Florida Act"). Pursuant to 28 U

United States v. City of Miami

2 F.3d 1497, 1993 WL 358511

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 17, 1993 | Docket: 64014475

Cited 7 times | Published

review by the state courts. Additionally, Fla.Stat. § 760.01, et seq., creates a Commission on Human Relations

Greenfield v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.

844 F. Supp. 1519, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22023, 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,015, 76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 725, 1992 WL 564888

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1992 | Docket: 1064848

Cited 7 times | Published

[1] The Florida Human Rights Act of 1977, Fla. Stat. 760.01 et seq. (West 1989), is patterned after Title

Maldonado v. Publix Supermarkets

939 So. 2d 290, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17271, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2006 | Docket: 1237740

Cited 6 times | Published

on her complaint for sexual harassment under section 760.01, et seq., Florida Statutes (2003), the Florida

Rivera v. Torfino Enterprises, Inc.

914 So. 2d 1087, 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1415, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18803, 98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 766, 2005 WL 3179984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2005 | Docket: 12959

Cited 6 times | Published

national origin, age, handicap, or marital status." § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). The heart of the statute

Collins v. Miami-Dade County

361 F. Supp. 2d 1362, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4661, 2005 WL 668825

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2005 | Docket: 2367585

Cited 6 times | Published

829 So.2d 891, 894 (Fla.2002) (citing Fla. Stat. § 760.01(2) (1999)). The FCRA is patterned after Title

Guess v. City of Miramar

889 So. 2d 840, 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 216, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17345, 2004 WL 2600496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2004 | Docket: 1488499

Cited 6 times | Published

termination under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), § 760.01, et seq., Florida Statutes (2003). The Florida

Woodham v. BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF FLA. INC.

793 So. 2d 41, 2001 WL 575105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2001 | Docket: 1266265

Cited 6 times | Published

origin, age, handicap, or marital status...." § 760.01(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). The legislature has declared

Hundertmark v. State of Florida Department of Transportation

205 F.3d 1272, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3439, 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,316, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 307

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 7, 2000 | Docket: 395768

Cited 6 times | Published

2000e and the Florida Human Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01. The district court dismissed the plaintiff’s

Laroche v. Denny's Inc.

62 F. Supp. 2d 1375, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13063, 1999 WL 669550

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1999 | Docket: 2282732

Cited 6 times | Published

1981; and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Section 760.01 et seq., Florida Statutes. The Court has jurisdiction

Malewski v. NationsBank of Florida, N.A.

978 F. Supp. 1095, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15876, 1997 WL 629232

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1997 | Docket: 1967355

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 ("FCRA"), Fla. Stat. 760.01 et seq., which is premised on age and disability

St. Petersburg Motor Club v. Cook

567 So. 2d 488, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6939, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,403, 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1736, 1990 WL 132030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1990 | Docket: 1721591

Cited 6 times | Published

pursuant to Florida's Human Rights Act of 1977. § 760.01(1), Fla. Stat. (1985). The complaint alleged that

Telfair v. Federal Express Corp.

934 F. Supp. 2d 1368, 2013 WL 1290228, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44649

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2013 | Docket: 65989926

Cited 5 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. (Count 2), and religious discrimination

Castro v. School Board

903 F. Supp. 2d 1290, 2012 WL 5193421, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150747

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2012 | Docket: 65986322

Cited 5 times | Published

and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. (“FCRA”). He also alleges that the School

Luna v. Walgreen Co.

575 F. Supp. 2d 1326, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95414, 2008 WL 4150221

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2008 | Docket: 1619148

Cited 5 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq., and the Florida Whistleblower's Act (FWA)

Gallagher v. Manatee County

927 So. 2d 914, 2006 WL 229044

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2006 | Docket: 1765505

Cited 5 times | Published

of civil rights plaintiffs, as required by section 760.01(3). He also relies on legislative history in

LeBlanc v. TJX Companies, Inc.

214 F. Supp. 2d 1319, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14783, 2002 WL 1787953

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2002 | Docket: 2312195

Cited 5 times | Published

Rights Act of 1992 ("FCRA"), Florida Statutes § 760.01, et. seq. Plaintiff also alleges that he experienced

Johnson v. Scotty's, Inc.

119 F. Supp. 2d 1276, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16242, 2000 WL 1676966

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2000 | Docket: 2197908

Cited 5 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq., (FCRA). The facts as stated are taken

Joshua v. City of Gainesville

734 So. 2d 1068, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4622, 1999 WL 71523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1999 | Docket: 1731047

Cited 5 times | Published

"Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992" ("the Act"). § 760.01(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). All statutory references

Weld v. Southeastern Companies, Inc.

10 F. Supp. 2d 1318, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10210, 1998 WL 384698

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1998 | Docket: 2332831

Cited 5 times | Published

Discrimination in Employment, alleged under Fla. Stat. § 760.01 and The Civil Rights Act of 1964, known as 42

Robinson v. Power Pizza, Inc.

993 F. Supp. 1458, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2661, 1998 WL 81884

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1998 | Docket: 2172838

Cited 5 times | Published

discrimination because of race [or] color ...." Fla. Stat. § 760.01. [3] By separate Order the Court has granted

Robinson v. Power Pizza, Inc.

993 F. Supp. 1458, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2661, 1998 WL 81884

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1998 | Docket: 2172838

Cited 5 times | Published

discrimination because of race [or] color ...." Fla. Stat. § 760.01. [3] By separate Order the Court has granted

Hipp v. Liberty National Life Insurance

973 F. Supp. 1033, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11137, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 123

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1997 | Docket: 1229313

Cited 5 times | Published

Civil Rights Act of 1992, Florida *1037 Statute § 760.01, et seq. Defendant removed the case to this Court

Bell v. Desoto Memorial Hospital, Inc.

842 F. Supp. 494, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 780, 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 309, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,337, 1994 WL 25368

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1994 | Docket: 1025391

Cited 5 times | Published

Florida Human Rights Act of 1977, as amended, § 760.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (1991) ("FHRA"). Plaintiff

Nova Southeastern University, Inc. v. Jacobson

25 So. 3d 82, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20008, 2009 WL 4928032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1196340

Cited 4 times | Published

violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.01, Florida Statutes, and that her termination

Carsillo v. City of Lake Worth

995 So. 2d 1118, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 18071, 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 672, 2008 WL 5070282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2008 | Docket: 1685080

Cited 4 times | Published

Carsillo filed under the Florida Civil Rights Act, section 760.01-10, Florida Statutes (2004) (FCRA), alleged

Footman v. Wang Tat Cheung

341 F. Supp. 2d 1218, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21080, 2004 WL 2382517

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2004 | Docket: 2331289

Cited 4 times | Published

Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.; Fla. Stat. 760.01 et seq., Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA")

Lemmon v. Lincoln Property Co.

307 F. Supp. 2d 1352, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3671, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,610, 2004 WL 415219

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2004 | Docket: 2311625

Cited 4 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et. seq. This case is currently before the Court

White v. City of Pompano Beach

813 So. 2d 1003, 2002 WL 429241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1402939

Cited 4 times | Published

import to the instant appeal, it opined, Under section 760.01(3), Florida Statutes (1997), "[t]he Florida

Showers v. City of Bartow

978 F. Supp. 1464, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16394, 1997 WL 655981

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1997 | Docket: 1973059

Cited 4 times | Published

of action of racial discrimination pursuant to § 760.01 et seq., Florida Statutes. In order to establish

Paldano v. Althin Medical, Inc.

974 F. Supp. 1441, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21066, 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 399, 1996 WL 913071

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1996 | Docket: 1617032

Cited 4 times | Published

1981 and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.01, Fla.Stat. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that

Carlson v. WPLG/TV-10, POST-NEWSWEEK STATIONS

956 F. Supp. 994, 1996 WL 767540

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1996 | Docket: 1464474

Cited 4 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Florida Statutes § 760.01, et seq., as amended, when it decided not to renew

Leme v. Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc.

248 F. Supp. 3d 1319, 2017 WL 1165550, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46400

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2017 | Docket: 64313786

Cited 3 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et. seq. See generally Amended Complaint and

Bolanos v. WORKFORCE ALLIANCE

23 So. 3d 171, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15999, 2009 WL 3430175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2009 | Docket: 1657474

Cited 3 times | Published

arbitrary age discrimination in employment") and § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2006) (stating the legislative

Duffy v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

414 F. Supp. 2d 1133, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3748, 2006 WL 229503

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2006 | Docket: 2323255

Cited 3 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act, Florida Statutes section 760.01, et seq. ("FCRA").[1] This matter is presently

Speaks v. City of Lakeland

315 F. Supp. 2d 1217, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7473, 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1371, 2004 WL 943866

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2004 | Docket: 2249487

Cited 3 times | Published

violated the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. ("FCRA") by allowing her to be sexually

Carter v. America Online, Inc.

208 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23906, 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 757, 2001 WL 1843381

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2001 | Docket: 2428495

Cited 3 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 ("FCRA"), Fla.Stat. § 760.01 et seq. (Count II), and Intentional Infliction

Dixon v. Sprint-Florida, Inc.

787 So. 2d 968, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8999, 2001 WL 725980

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2001 | Docket: 1495751

Cited 3 times | Published

governed by the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. See § 760.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (1997)(the Act). Under the

Mortenson v. City of Oldsmar

54 F. Supp. 2d 1118, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9950, 1999 WL 454657

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1999 | Docket: 2384175

Cited 3 times | Published

proof is applicable to claims brought under section 760.01, Florida Statutes (1995) as well as those brought

Lemay v. Budget Rent a Car Systems, Inc.

993 F. Supp. 1448, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22639, 1997 WL 842961

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1997 | Docket: 2173050

Cited 3 times | Published

liable for age discrimination under Fla.Stat. § 760.01 et seq., the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992

Diaz v. Florida

219 F. Supp. 3d 1207, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153424, 2016 WL 6565935

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2016 | Docket: 64311314

Cited 2 times | Published

and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. 760.01 et seq. (“FCRA”) (Counts I and III); and retaliation

Hamilton v. Sheridan Healthcorp Inc.

602 F. App'x 485

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 3, 2015 | Docket: 65959623

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. Dr. Hamilton raises three arguments on

Peguy Delva v. The Continental Group, Inc.

137 So. 3d 371, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 246, 2014 WL 1491497, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1316, 122 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 707

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2014 | Docket: 795786

Cited 2 times | Published

that the FCRA “shall be liberally construed.” § 760.01(3), Fla. Stat. (2011). Accordingly, we quash the

Johnson v. Great Expressions Dental Centers of Florida, P.A.

132 So. 3d 1174, 2014 WL 55043, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 193, 121 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60238329

Cited 2 times | Published

under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, section 760.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (2009) (“FCRA”),

Smart v. City of Miami Beach

933 F. Supp. 2d 1366, 2013 WL 1223588, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45003, 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1412

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2013 | Docket: 65989817

Cited 2 times | Published

and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. See PL’s Second Am. Compl., ECF No. 40

Mena v. Lifemark Hospitals of Florida, Inc.

50 So. 3d 759, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20221, 2010 WL 5306523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2010 | Docket: 2397439

Cited 2 times | Published

a place of public accommodation." Analysis Section 760.01(2), Florida Statutes, explains that the "general

Washington v. School Board of Hillsborough County

731 F. Supp. 2d 1309, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80192, 2010 WL 3069508

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2010 | Docket: 305051

Cited 2 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act, Florida Statute Section 760.01; (2) age discrimination in violation of the

Byrd v. BT FOODS, INC.

26 So. 3d 600, 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1445, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18431, 2009 WL 4282945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2009 | Docket: 239434

Cited 2 times | Published

. The Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq., prohibits employers from discharging

Verna v. Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County

539 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 2008 WL 821651

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2008 | Docket: 2020878

Cited 2 times | Published

based on the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat § 760.01 et seq. (Id.). On January 16, 2007, Verna filed

Moore v. Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners

544 F. Supp. 2d 1291, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1368

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2008 | Docket: 1275380

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. Because federal case law interpreting

Lapar v. Potter

395 F. Supp. 2d 1152, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28414, 2005 WL 2663497

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2005 | Docket: 2299831

Cited 2 times | Published

privileges of individuals within the state. (Fla.Stat. § 760.01(2)). Defendant correctly argues that Count IV

Wallace v. Public Health Trust of Dade County

370 F. Supp. 2d 1247, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14358, 2005 WL 1330652

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 2392811

Cited 2 times | Published

Title VII is applicable to claims under FCRA, § 760.01 et. seq. Fla. State Univ. v. Sondel, 685 So.2d

Segura v. Hunter Douglas Fabrication Co.

184 F. Supp. 2d 1227, 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1396, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1912, 2002 WL 185543

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2002 | Docket: 2337507

Cited 2 times | Published

Plaintiff is to be applied, according to the FCRA. § 760.01(3) Fla.Stat. (2001). The more permissive category

Donato v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.

146 F.3d 1329, 1998 WL 412955

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 23, 1998 | Docket: 1068918

Cited 2 times | Published

to prohibit discrimination). See Fla. Stat. § 760.01(3) (Act must be "liberally construed to further

Mason v. K Mart Corp.

1 F. Supp. 2d 1333, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5217, 1998 WL 181961

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1998 | Docket: 2435594

Cited 2 times | Published

according to the "fair import of its terms." Id. § 760.01(3). Examining the FCRA in this light, the Court

Kounelis v. Mount Sinai Medical Center of Greater Miami, Inc.

987 F. Supp. 1452, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19140, 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 659, 1997 WL 706644

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1997 | Docket: 1721025

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA"), Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. In 1981, at the age of 52 or 53, Kounelis

Edgecombe v. Lowes Home Ctrs., L.L.C.

391 F. Supp. 3d 1142

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2019 | Docket: 64325410

Cited 1 times | Published

Rights Act of 1992 ("FCRA"). Florida Statutes § 760.01 et seq. ; [DE 1-1] at ¶ 286. Additionally, they

Abraka Okposio v. Barry University (Main Campus)

252 So. 3d 1290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2018 | Docket: 7927602

Cited 1 times | Published

and privileges of individuals within the state. § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2016). Section 760.08, Florida

Stephen v. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute Lifetime Cancer Screening Center, Inc.

259 F. Supp. 3d 1323

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 3, 2017 | Docket: 64314629

Cited 1 times | Published

and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. (“FCRA”). He asserts that Moffitt discriminated

Gonzalez v. Florida Department of Management Services

124 F. Supp. 3d 1317, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112521, 2015 WL 5016618

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2015 | Docket: 64303705

Cited 1 times | Published

Civil Rights Act of 1992 (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.01. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment

Loberger v. Del-Jen Inc.

616 F. App'x 922

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 25, 2015 | Docket: 65960456

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.01. After careful review, we affirm. I. We recite

Olson v. Dex Imaging, Inc.

63 F. Supp. 3d 1353, 59 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2193, 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 282, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150227, 2014 WL 5420811

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2014 | Docket: 64298752

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”); Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq.; gender discrimination under the FCRA;

Finn v. Kent Security Services, Inc.

981 F. Supp. 2d 1293, 2013 WL 5954388, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158873, 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1134

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2013 | Docket: 65995369

Cited 1 times | Published

(Count I), and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. 760-01 et seq. (“FCRA”) (Count II). D.E. 1 at 6-8

Wright v. Sandestin Investments, LLC

914 F. Supp. 2d 1273, 2012 WL 6194872, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175837, 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1533

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2012 | Docket: 65987579

Cited 1 times | Published

general purposes stated in this section.” Fla. Stat. § 760.01(3); see also Woodham, 829 So.2d at 894. Additionally

Samson v. Federal Express Corp.

874 F. Supp. 2d 1360, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90314, 2012 WL 2511438

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2012 | Docket: 65982906

Cited 1 times | Published

(“ADA”) and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. (“FCRA”) against Defendant Federal Express

BD. OF TRUSTEES OF STATE UNIV. v. Esposito

991 So. 2d 924, 2008 WL 3540213

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2008 | Docket: 1398302

Cited 1 times | Published

national origin, age, handicap, or marital status." § 760.01(2), Florida Statutes (2005). The FCRA is a remedial

Murdick v. Catalina Marketing Corp.

496 F. Supp. 2d 1337, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49992, 2007 WL 2021953

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2007 | Docket: 2179450

Cited 1 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01-760.11 (2001), and for Violation of the Federal

Jackson v. WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES, INC.

960 So. 2d 3, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4353, 2005 WL 713784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2005 | Docket: 1726272

Cited 1 times | Published

consistent with the purposes of the statute, see § 760.01, Fla. Stat. (2003), and serves the important policy

Santini v. Cleveland Clinic Florida

843 So. 2d 1029, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6675, 2003 WL 21012701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2003 | Docket: 64822558

Cited 1 times | Published

Statutes, “Amy person aggrieved by a violation of § 760.01-760.10 may file a complaint with the state commission

Palisano v. City of Clearwater

219 F. Supp. 2d 1249, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21043, 2002 WL 2012043

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2002 | Docket: 2320445

Cited 1 times | Published

claims under the Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA"), § 760.01 et seq, Fla. Stat.), arguing that Plaintiff failed

Doss v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

140 F. Supp. 2d 1304, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5306, 2001 WL 432390

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2001 | Docket: 2234908

Cited 1 times | Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act, Florida Statutes § 760.01 et seq. Plaintiff further alleges that the Teamsters's

St. Hilaire v. the Pep Boys-Manny, Moe and Jack

73 F. Supp. 2d 1350, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17762, 1999 WL 1051278

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1999 | Docket: 2180558

Cited 1 times | Published

The Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, (Fla.Stat. § 760.01 et seq.) (hereafter FCRA); and the Florida Whistle

Gray v. Webco General Partnership

36 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2103, 1999 WL 101376

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1999 | Docket: 2564788

Cited 1 times | Published

VII and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, section 760.01-760.11, Florida Statutes (1995)." Id. The basis

Snoke v. Staff Leasing, Inc.

43 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22210, 1998 WL 1035430

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1998 | Docket: 2295409

Cited 1 times | Published

VII") and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.1, Fla.Stat. (1992) ("FCRA"). I. BACKGROUND FACTS

Elger v. Martin Memorial Health Systems, Inc.

6 F. Supp. 2d 1351, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8518, 1998 WL 310712

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 7, 1998 | Docket: 2177031

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida Civil Rights Act, as amended, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. by creating an intimidating, hostile and

McKelvy v. Metal Container Corp.

854 F.2d 448, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12165, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,306, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1405, 1988 WL 85918

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 7, 1988 | Docket: 66237854

Cited 1 times | Published

upon age discrimination charges. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 760.01 et seq. See Thomas v. Florida Power & Light Co

Carlton Condominium Association, Inc. v. Dominique Miniaci

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2025 | Docket: 71259169

Published

covers only “[s]ections 760.01-760.11 and 509.092.” § 760.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2024). In sum, Fair Housing

Steak N Shake, Inc. v. Wilfred Ramos, Jr.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2025 | Docket: 70749419

Published

national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.” § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. The FCRA created the Florida Commission

WILFRED W. RAMOS, JR. v. STEAK N SHAKE, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2023 | Docket: 68103410

Published

Gainesville, 768 So. 2d 432, 435 (Fla. 2000); see also § 760.01(3) ("The Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992

Doris Lapham v. Walgreen Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 13, 2023 | Docket: 64881971

Published

Argued: Aug 10, 2022

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. Walgreens removed the action to

Dylan Campbell v. Universal City Development Partners, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 7, 2023 | Docket: 67262900

Published

Argued: Apr 26, 2023

12182(b)(2)(A)(i) and the Florida Civil Rights Act, § 760.01, et seq. USCA11 Case: 22-10646 Document:

PAULA GRACE WILLIS v. ACCENTURE, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2023 | Docket: 67012407

Published

Act of 1992 (FCRA), as amended, codified in section 760.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (2019), and tortious

Carolina Rose Matamoros v. Broward Sheriffs Office

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 25, 2021 | Docket: 60015169

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993

Christine D'Onofrio v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 6, 2020 | Docket: 17324057

Published

under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), § 760.01 - § 760.11. The dispute arose after Costco Wholesale

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—report No. 16-01

214 So. 3d 552

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2017 | Docket: 4669815

Published

origin, age, handicap, or marital status. F.S. 760.01-760.11. 417.1 INTRODUCTION Members

Waring v. Miami-Dade County

172 F. Supp. 3d 1343, 2016 WL 1203971, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43666

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2016 | Docket: 64307772

Published

VII”) and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. (“FCRA”). On January 15, 2016, Defendant

Kim Cimino, Personal representative of the Estate of Michael Cimino, and Kim Cimino ex rel. Kim and Michael Cimino's Son v. American Airlines, Inc.

183 So. 3d 1242, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 720, 2016 WL 231511

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2016 | Docket: 3029489

Published

national origin, age, handicap, or - marital status.” § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2014). “Any person aggrieved by

Hellwege v. Tampa Family Health Centers

103 F. Supp. 3d 1303, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47102, 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1613, 2015 WL 1608827

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2015 | Docket: 64301919

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 760.01 et seq. (TFHC only). (See Id.). Lindsey filed

Crane v. Lifemark Hosp. of Fla., Inc.

149 So. 3d 718, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16840, 2014 WL 5151621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2014 | Docket: 1447565

Published

origin, age, handicap, or marital status .... ” § 760.01(3). The Act then expressly requires that its terms

Smart v. City of Miami Beach

1 F. Supp. 3d 1350, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30123, 2014 WL 847814

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2014 | Docket: 64293417

Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 22-34.) First, Plaintiff

Glass v. Captain Katanna's, Inc.

950 F. Supp. 2d 1235, 2013 WL 3017010, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87179, 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1540

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2013 | Docket: 65991882

Published

general purposes stated in this section ____”18 § 760.01(3) Fla. Stat (2012); e.g., Maggio v. Fla. Dep’t

J.P.M. v. Palm Beach County School Board

877 F. Supp. 2d 1309, 2012 WL 2735327, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94152

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2012 | Docket: 65983182

Published

Violation of Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. The School Board argues that this claim

Berrios v. University of Miami

920 F. Supp. 2d 1274, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104414, 2012 WL 7006397

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2012 | Docket: 65988424

Published

and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. 760.01 et seq. (“FCRA”). In Count 1 of her complaint

Dulaney v. Miami-Dade County

785 F. Supp. 2d 1343, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57436, 2011 WL 1900717

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 5, 2011 | Docket: 1996246

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA"), FLA. STAT. § 760.01, et seq. (See Complaint, D.E. 1.) Dulaney raises

Jennings v. Walgreen Co.

805 F. Supp. 2d 1345, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40601, 2011 WL 1430328

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2011 | Docket: 65975335

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.01-.11 (2009). The Court has considered the parties’

Butts v. AMERIPATH, INC.

794 F. Supp. 2d 1277, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73268, 2011 WL 2623464

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2011 | Docket: 1962113

Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. ("FCRA"). Ameripath denies Butts's claims

Mindy Slater v. Energy Services Group

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 8, 2011 | Docket: 2906539

Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. (FCRA), and the Florida Whistleblower

Holland v. Gee

719 F. Supp. 2d 1361, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59598, 2010 WL 2431904

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2010 | Docket: 2403962

Published

violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.01, Florida Statutes, ("FCRA") and a violation of

Escala v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC

727 F. Supp. 2d 1350, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129641, 2009 WL 6704559

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2009 | Docket: 2334488

Published

violations of the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 29, 2008 | Docket: 3256588

Published

intent for enactment of this legislation in section 760.01(2): "The general purposes of the Florida Civil

Austin v. Progressive RSC, Inc.

510 F. Supp. 2d 855, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30805, 2007 WL 1231839

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2007 | Docket: 2136765

Published

the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et. seq. ("FCRA") based upon his race, African

Anderson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

506 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17979, 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,851, 2007 WL 788810

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2007 | Docket: 2378308

Published

under the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01. Of course, the Court's granting of Plaintiff's

Freeman v. Walgreen Co.

407 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38879, 2005 WL 3591986

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2005 | Docket: 2257496

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as amended, Fla. Stat. 760.01-760.11 (FCRA), and Title VII of the Civil

Pagan v. Abraham Chevrolet-Tampa, Inc.

891 So. 2d 586, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19096, 2004 WL 2894913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2004 | Docket: 64835469

Published

DANAHY, PAUL W., SENIOR JUDGE, Concur. . See § 760.01, etseq., Fla. Stat. (2001).

Martinez v. Abraham Chevrolet-Tampa, Inc.

891 So. 2d 579, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18813, 2004 WL 3025053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2004 | Docket: 64835468

Published

opinion. STRINGER and KELLY, JJ., Concur. . See § 760.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (2001).

Knopfel v. Tech Data Corp.

225 F.R.D. 263, 60 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 763, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25813, 2004 WL 2937239

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2004 | Docket: 66022051

Published

VII) and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq., (FCRA), failure to promote under Title

Roberts v. Rayonier, Inc.

326 F. Supp. 2d 1323, 15 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1466, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14559, 2004 WL 1663829

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2004 | Docket: 2277623

Published

pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, § 760.01 et seq. ("FCRA") for disability discrimination

McCabe v. Excel Hospitality, Inc.

294 F. Supp. 2d 1311, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22595, 2003 WL 22931346

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2003 | Docket: 1942579

Published

and (3) the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. ("FCRA").[1] Defendant moved for summary

Sterling Casino Lines, LP v. Chestnut

825 So. 2d 484, 2002 WL 1990671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2002 | Docket: 1691229

Published

seq. (the ADA) and the Florida Civil Rights Act, § 760.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (the FCRA). [2] This amount

Tom J. Hollis v. Florida State University

259 F.3d 1295

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 30, 2001 | Docket: 75831

Published

and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01 et seq. FSU removed the case to the U

Diaz v. Florida Highway Patrol

775 So. 2d 389, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15428, 2000 WL 1745041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2000 | Docket: 64802953

Published

S.Ct. 631, 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000)) (citing section 760.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (1997 and Supp. 1998)

Carnesi v. Ferry Pass United Methodist Church

770 So. 2d 1286, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14930, 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 680, 2000 WL 1706924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2000 | Docket: 64801646

Published

quid pro quo sexual harassment pursuant to section 760.01, Florida Statutes ’ (1995), and assault, battery

Bell v. Board of Regents

768 So. 2d 1244, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13231, 2000 WL 1508508

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2000 | Docket: 64800922

Published

631, 650, 145 L.Ed.2d 522 & fn (2000) (citing section 760.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (1997 and Supp.1998)

Hundertmark v. State of FL DOT

205 F.3d 1272

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 7, 2000 | Docket: 395765

Published

2000e and the Florida Human Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01. The district court dismissed the plaintiff’s

Sinclair v. De Jay Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 23, 1999 | Docket: 395143

Published

Act of 1992 ("FCRA"), Fla. Stat. Ann. § 760.01-760.11.1 Sinclair argues that the district court

Sinclair v. De Jay Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 23, 1999 | Docket: 2037171

Published

Rights Act of 1992 (“FCRA”), Fla. Stat. Ann. § 760.01-760.11.1 Sinclair argues that the district court

Anderson v. TBA Partnership, Ltd.

733 So. 2d 1032, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13269, 1998 WL 786166

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1998 | Docket: 64788461

Published

him because of his handicap in violation of section 760.01, et seq., Florida Statutes (1995). Tampa Bay

Donato v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

146 F.3d 1329, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 16868, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,414, 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 495

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 23, 1998 | Docket: 8857

Published

prohibit discrimination). See Fla. Stat. § 760.01(3) (Act must be “liberally construed to further

Reeseman v. Pinellas Rent-A-Car, Inc.

987 F. Supp. 1428, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19152, 1997 WL 793317

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1997 | Docket: 66019587

Published

Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as amended, F.S. § 760.01, et seq. At the age of 55 or 56, Plaintiff was

Weaver v. School Bd. of Leon County

624 So. 2d 761, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9224, 1993 WL 347689

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1993 | Docket: 2546913

Published

from the discretion vested in it by statute, section 760.01, Florida Statutes (1985), to award "reasonable

Edmunds v. Ryder/PIE Nationwide, Inc.

659 F. Supp. 341, 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 832, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8464, 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,916

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1987 | Docket: 66171038

Published

ADEA. See Human Rights Act of 1977, Fla.Stat. § 760.01-760.10 (1985). Therefore, Florida is what is known

Edmunds v. Ryder/PIE Nationwide, Inc.

659 F. Supp. 341, 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 832, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8464, 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,916

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1987 | Docket: 66171038

Published

ADEA. See Human Rights Act of 1977, Fla.Stat. § 760.01-760.10 (1985). Therefore, Florida is what is known

Duval County School Board v. State, Dept. of Administration

500 So. 2d 158, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1335, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8325, 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,569, 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1986 | Docket: 64624084

Published

provisions of the Human Rights Act of 1977, Section 760.01-.10, Florida Statutes (1983),1 by refusing