768.0427
Admissibility of evidence to prove medical expenses in personal injury or wrongful death actions; disclosure of letters of protection; recovery of past and future medical expenses damages.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
768.0427 Admissibility of evidence to prove medical expenses in personal injury or wrongful death actions; disclosure of letters of protection; recovery of past and future medical expenses damages.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Factoring company” means a person who purchases a health care provider’s accounts receivable at a discount below the invoice value of such accounts.
(b) “Health care coverage” means any third-party health care or disability services financing arrangement, including, but not limited to, arrangements with entities certified or authorized under federal law or under the Florida Insurance Code; state or federal health care benefit programs; workers’ compensation; and personal injury protection.
(c) “Health care provider” means any of the following professionals and entities, and professionals and entities similarly licensed in another jurisdiction:
1. A provider as defined in s. 408.803.
2. A clinical laboratory providing services in this state or services to health care providers in this state, if the clinical laboratory is certified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under the federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments and the federal rules adopted thereunder.
3. A federally qualified health center as defined in 42 U.S.C. s. 1396d(l)(2)(B), as that definition existed on March 24, 2023.
4. A health care practitioner as defined in s. 456.001.
5. A health care professional licensed under part IV of chapter 468.
6. A home health aide as defined in s. 400.462.
7. A provider licensed under chapter 394 or chapter 397 and its clinical and nonclinical staff providing inpatient or outpatient services.
8. A continuing care facility licensed under chapter 651.
9. A pharmacy permitted under chapter 465.
(d) “Letter of protection” means any arrangement by which a health care provider renders treatment in exchange for a promise of payment for the claimant’s medical expenses from any judgment or settlement of a personal injury or wrongful death action. The term includes any such arrangement, regardless of whether referred to as a letter of protection.
(2) ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT OR SERVICE EXPENSES.—Evidence offered to prove the amount of damages for past or future medical treatment or services in a personal injury or wrongful death action is admissible as provided in this subsection.
(a) Evidence offered to prove the amount of damages for past medical treatment or services that have been satisfied is limited to evidence of the amount actually paid, regardless of the source of payment.
(b) Evidence offered to prove the amount necessary to satisfy unpaid charges for incurred medical treatment or services shall include, but is not limited to, evidence as provided in this paragraph.
1. If the claimant has health care coverage other than Medicare or Medicaid, evidence of the amount which such health care coverage is obligated to pay the health care provider to satisfy the charges for the claimant’s incurred medical treatment or services, plus the claimant’s share of medical expenses under the insurance contract or regulation.
2. If the claimant has health care coverage but obtains treatment under a letter of protection or otherwise does not submit charges for any health care provider’s medical treatment or services to health care coverage, evidence of the amount the claimant’s health care coverage would pay the health care provider to satisfy the past unpaid medical charges under the insurance contract or regulation, plus the claimant’s share of medical expenses under the insurance contract or regulation, had the claimant obtained medical services or treatment pursuant to the health care coverage.
3. If the claimant does not have health care coverage or has health care coverage through Medicare or Medicaid, evidence of 120 percent of the Medicare reimbursement rate in effect on the date of the claimant’s incurred medical treatment or services, or, if there is no applicable Medicare rate for a service, 170 percent of the applicable state Medicaid rate.
4. If the claimant obtains medical treatment or services under a letter of protection and the health care provider subsequently transfers the right to receive payment under the letter of protection to a third party, evidence of the amount the third party paid or agreed to pay the health care provider in exchange for the right to receive payment pursuant to the letter of protection.
5. Any evidence of reasonable amounts billed to the claimant for medically necessary treatment or medically necessary services provided to the claimant.
(c) Evidence offered to prove the amount of damages for any future medical treatment or services the claimant will receive shall include, but is not limited to, evidence as provided in this paragraph.
1. If the claimant has health care coverage other than Medicare or Medicaid, or is eligible for any such health care coverage, evidence of the amount for which the future charges of health care providers could be satisfied if submitted to such health care coverage, plus the claimant’s share of medical expenses under the insurance contract or regulation.
2. If the claimant does not have health care coverage or has health care coverage through Medicare or Medicaid, or is eligible for such health care coverage, evidence of 120 percent of the Medicare reimbursement rate in effect at the time of trial for the medical treatment or services the claimant will receive, or, if there is no applicable Medicare rate for a service, 170 percent of the applicable state Medicaid rate.
3. Any evidence of reasonable future amounts to be billed to the claimant for medically necessary treatment or medically necessary services.
(d) This subsection does not impose an affirmative duty upon any party to seek a reduction in billed charges to which the party is not contractually entitled.
(e) Individual contracts between providers and authorized commercial insurers or authorized health maintenance organizations are not subject to discovery or disclosure and are not admissible into evidence.
(3) LETTERS OF PROTECTION; REQUIRED DISCLOSURES.—In a personal injury or wrongful death action, as a condition precedent to asserting any claim for medical expenses for treatment rendered under a letter of protection, the claimant must disclose:
(a) A copy of the letter of protection.
(b) All billings for the claimant’s medical expenses, which must be itemized and, to the extent applicable, coded according to:
1. For health care providers billing at the provider level, the American Medical Association’s Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), or the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS), in effect on the date the services were rendered.
2. For health care providers billing at the facility level for expenses incurred in a clinical or outpatient setting, including when billing through an Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) or Enhanced Ambulatory Patient Grouping (EAPG), the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis code and, if applicable, the American Medical Association’s Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), in effect on the date the services were rendered.
3. For health care providers billing at the facility level for expenses incurred in an inpatient setting, including when billing through a Diagnosis Related Group (DRG), the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis and procedure codes in effect on the date in which the claimant is discharged.
(c) If the health care provider sells the accounts receivable for the claimant’s medical expenses to a factoring company or other third party:
1. The name of the factoring company or other third party who purchased such accounts.
2. The dollar amount for which the factoring company or other third party purchased such accounts, including any discount provided below the invoice amount.
(d) Whether the claimant, at the time medical treatment was rendered, had health care coverage and, if so, the identity of such coverage.
(e) Whether the claimant was referred for treatment under a letter of protection and, if so, the identity of the person who made the referral. If the referral is made by the claimant’s attorney, disclosure of the referral is permitted, and evidence of such referral is admissible notwithstanding s. 90.502. Moreover, in such situation, the financial relationship between a law firm and a medical provider, including the number of referrals, frequency, and financial benefit obtained, is relevant to the issue of the bias of a testifying medical provider.
(4) DAMAGES RECOVERABLE FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT OR SERVICE EXPENSES.—The damages that may be recovered by a claimant in a personal injury or wrongful death action for the reasonable and necessary cost or value of medical care rendered may not include any amount in excess of the evidence of medical treatment and services expenses admitted pursuant to subsection (2), and also may not exceed the sum of the following:
(a) Amounts actually paid by or on behalf of the claimant to a health care provider who rendered medical treatment or services;
(b) Amounts necessary to satisfy charges for medical treatment or services that are due and owing but at the time of trial are not yet satisfied; and
(c) Amounts necessary to provide for any reasonable and necessary medical treatment or services the claimant will receive in the future.
History.—ss. 6, 27, ch. 2023-15.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2023–2026 · leading case: Soriano v. The Neiman Marcus Group LLC
Soriano v. The Neiman Marcus Group LLC (2025)
“Defendant now seeks to dismiss the Complaint because Plaintiff has failed to establish the statutory conditions precedent outlined in the 2023 Tort Reform Act (codified in relevant part in Fla Stat. § 768.0427).2 ECF No. [5] at 1-2.”
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Defendant argues that Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, case history, and alterations have been omitted in this and later citations.”
Goldsmith v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America (2024)
“Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 (2). Plaintiffs point out that: “[i]n essence, [§ 768.”
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Because § 768.0427 acts as an evidentiary gateway for personal injury claimants—rather than a procedural trapdoor—Defendant’s motion is DENIED.”
Eli Wolf v. Exylena Williams (2024)
“Before trial, the parties disagreed about the application of section 768.0427, Florida Statutes. That statute, which became effective in March 2023, restricts evidence of medical expenses in personal injury cases to amounts the claimant paid or would be obligated to pay.”
McConnell v. Costco Wholesale Corporation (2023)
“Costco’s Motion for Retroactive Application of Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 (Doc. 45) is DENIED.”
JUSTIN A. LAZAROFF vs LARRY MEEK (2023)
“(amending § 768.0427(2), Fla. Stat. (2023)). 4 As to a curative instruction, the defense counsel suggested that the jury be told that the plaintiff is “not getting Medicare and you shouldn’t consider any Medicare” in any way.”
LANZA v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC (2025)
“Defendant moves to dismiss for failure to satisfy a condition precedent under Florida Statutes § 768.0427(3), and for failure to state a claim.”
Hall v. Progressive American Insurance Company (2025)
“See also Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 (3)(e). Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1.”
Young v. Panera, LLC (2024)
“Defendant’s Motion in Limine for Retroactive Application of Florida Statute § 768.0427, (Dkt. 75), is DENIED. 5. Defendant’s Motion in Limine Regarding Plaintiffs’ Experts, (Dkt.”
— 768.0427(2) — 4 cases
JUSTIN A. LAZAROFF vs LARRY MEEK (2023)
“(amending § 768.0427(2), Fla. Stat. (2023)). 4 As to a curative instruction, the defense counsel suggested that the jury be told that the plaintiff is “not getting Medicare and you shouldn’t consider any Medicare” in any way.”
Goldsmith v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America (2024)
“Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 (2). Plaintiffs point out that: “[i]n essence, [§ 768.”
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Because § 768.0427 acts as an evidentiary gateway for personal injury claimants—rather than a procedural trapdoor—Defendant’s motion is DENIED.”
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Defendant argues that Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, case history, and alterations have been omitted in this and later citations.”
— 768.0427(2)(a) — 2 cases
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Because § 768.0427 acts as an evidentiary gateway for personal injury claimants—rather than a procedural trapdoor—Defendant’s motion is DENIED.”
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Defendant argues that Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, case history, and alterations have been omitted in this and later citations.”
— 768.0427(2)(b) — 2 cases
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Defendant argues that Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, case history, and alterations have been omitted in this and later citations.”
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Because § 768.0427 acts as an evidentiary gateway for personal injury claimants—rather than a procedural trapdoor—Defendant’s motion is DENIED.”
— 768.0427(2)(c) — 2 cases
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Defendant argues that Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, case history, and alterations have been omitted in this and later citations.”
Jessica Guadalupe Ramos Alvarez, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minor Child, J.Z.R.; and Vicente Pau (2026)
“Because § 768.0427 acts as an evidentiary gateway for personal injury claimants—rather than a procedural trapdoor—Defendant’s motion is DENIED.”
— 768.0427(3) — 2 cases
Soriano v. The Neiman Marcus Group LLC (2025)
“Defendant now seeks to dismiss the Complaint because Plaintiff has failed to establish the statutory conditions precedent outlined in the 2023 Tort Reform Act (codified in relevant part in Fla Stat. § 768.0427).2 ECF No. [5] at 1-2.”
LANZA v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC (2025)
“Defendant moves to dismiss for failure to satisfy a condition precedent under Florida Statutes § 768.0427(3), and for failure to state a claim.”
— 768.0427(3)(a) — 1 case
Soriano v. The Neiman Marcus Group LLC (2025)
“Defendant now seeks to dismiss the Complaint because Plaintiff has failed to establish the statutory conditions precedent outlined in the 2023 Tort Reform Act (codified in relevant part in Fla Stat. § 768.0427).2 ECF No. [5] at 1-2.”
— 768.0427(31) — 1 case
Goldsmith v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America (2024)
“Fla. Stat. § 768.0427 (2). Plaintiffs point out that: “[i]n essence, [§ 768.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.