Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 768.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 768.12 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 768.12

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS
Chapter 768
NEGLIGENCE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 768.12
768.12 Motor vehicle colliding with any animal at large on a public highway.—Whenever a motor vehicle collides with any animal at large on a public highway of this state, and the operator of the motor vehicle dies as a result of the collision, the owner of such animal shall have no cause of action against the personal representative of the estate of the said deceased operator on account of any injuries to, or the death of, such animal, resulting from the collision.
History.—s. 1, ch. 21018, 1941.

F.S. 768.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 768.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 768.12


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 768.12
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 768.12.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 768.12

Total Results: 3

Quarantello v. Leroy

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-02-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 977 So. 2d 648

Snippet: be held liable for any civil damages"); § 768.12, Fla. Stat. (2007) (using the terminology, "

Hart v. Atlantic International Investment Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-10-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 513 So. 2d 768, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2389, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12260

Snippet: Cowart, Sharp, Upchurch 8 October 1987 513 So. 2d 768, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2389, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12260

Abstract Corp. v. Park Avenue Paints, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-05-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 235 So. 2d 323, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6388

Snippet: were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $2,-768.12; that the appellant had agreed to act as an escrow…individual defendants in the form of a check for $1,768.12 and a 90-day promissory note for $1,000, both payable…the plaintiff against appellant in the sum of $2,768.12, plus costs. The second amended complaint does