Cases from cite.case.law:

HOFFMAN, v. Dr. W. BOYD,, 698 So. 2d 346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . contracts attached to the complaint clearly fit within the legislative prohibition of sections 771.01 and 771.04 . . . Section 771.04 solely addresses contracts to marry: No contract to marry hereafter made or entered into . . .

WILDEY, v. A. SPRINGS,, 47 F.3d 1475 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 771.04 (1986). Illinois, too, outlawed the common law cause of action. . . .

WILDEY, v. A. SPRINGS, III,, 840 F. Supp. 1259 (N.D. Ill. 1994)

. . . . § 771.04. . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 771.04. . . . .

WRIGHT, v. B. WRIGHT,, 509 So. 2d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . consideration of premarital sacrifices, the Duttenhofer court purported to reason by analogy from section 771.04 . . . Section 771.04 bars a cause of action where a prospective spouse abandons the marriage plan before consummation . . .

DUTTENHOFER, v. D. DUTTENHOFER,, 474 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Florida’s “heart balm” legislation, see § 771.04, Fla.Stat. (1983), which abolished, inter alia, the . . . Before the enactment of Section 771.04, damages recoverable for breach of promise to marry included loss . . . for loss of future support, if brought as an independent action, would likely be outlawed by Section 771.04 . . . Section 771.04, Florida Statutes (1983), states: “No act hereafter done within this state shall operate . . .

TREMBLAY, v. L. CARTER, d b a, 390 So. 2d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . . § 771.04, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

A. DE BOER v. DYKES, 178 F. Supp. 74 (W.D. Ark. 1959)

. . . In 1952 the average gross monthly income from cabin rentals was $771.04. . . .

TITLE GUARANTY TRUST CO. v. PUGET SOUND ENGINE WORKS, 163 F. 168 (9th Cir. 1908)

. . . Judgment was asked against the defendants and each of them in the sum of $771.04. . . .