Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 772.101 (2025)
Short title.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
772.101 Short title.—This chapter shall be known as the “Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44
cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Omnipol, A.S. v. Christopher Worrell, 32 F.4th 1298 (11th Cir. 2022).
Omnipol, A.S. v. Christopher Worrell, 32 F.4th 1298 (11th Cir. 2022). “Finally, Omnipol and Elmex challenge the District Court’s dismissal of their state ( Fla. Stat. § 772.101 ) and federal ( 18 U.”
Lennar Corp. v. Briarwood Capital LLC, 430 B.R. 253 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2010). “Instead, Defendants argue that the allegations in Count I of the Complaint, which alleges violations of Florida Civil RICO, Fla. Stat. § 772.101 , et seq., implicate federal law issues sufficient to establish federal question jurisdiction.”
Marshall v. Picard (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC), 740 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2014). “Their complaints asserted claims for civil conspiracy, conversion, and conspiracy to *86 violate the Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, see Fla. Stat. § 772.101 et seq. On May 3, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court in New York granted the Trustee’s application for a…”
Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. Devine, 233 F. Supp. 3d 1297 (M.D. Fla. 2017). “” Fla. Stat. § 772.101 . . The federal RICO civil remedies provision provides in pertinent part: "Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefore in any appropriate United States *1328 district court and…”
Silver v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 760 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (S.D. Fla. 2011). “See Fla. Stat. §§ 772.101 et seq. Silver failed to file a Civil RICO Case Statement pursuant to S.”
Baldree v. Cargill, Inc., 758 F. Supp. 704 (M.D. Fla. 1990). “, and the Florida RICO Act, Fla.Stat. § 772.101 et seq. On January 11, 1990, the court consolidated the two actions, and on February 2, 1990, the Court held a joint hearing on the two motions.”
Joselyn Santiago v. Raytheon Tech. Corp., 973 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2020). “The Santiagos’ amended complaint added a fourth count arising under Florida’s civil RICO statute, Fla. Stat. § 772.101 et seq. The district court granted Pratt & Whitney’s motion to dismiss that claim.”
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Lundbeck LLC, 130 F. 4th 91 (4th Cir. 2025). “Plaintiffs’ claim under Florida’s RICO statute, the Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, Fla. Stat. § 772.101 et seq., fails for the same reasons.”
Burgese v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., 101 F. Supp. 3d 414 (D.N.J. 2015). “) Defendants seek to dismiss Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint, which allege violations of the Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, Fla. Stat. § 772.101 et seq., Florida’s equivalent of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”).”
Florida Evergreen Foliage v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., 336 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (S.D. Fla. 2004). “This Act, Florida Statutes § 772.101 et seq., is patterned after the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), codified at 18 U.”
Nerline Horace-Manasse v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 521 F. App'x 782 (11th Cir. 2013). “) for violations of Florida’s Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act (“Florida RICO Act”), Fla. Stat. § 772.101 , and for conspiracy to violate the Florida RICO Act.”
Bray & Gillespie Mgmt. LLC v. Lexington Ins., 527 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (M.D. Fla. 2007). “Florida’s Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, codified as Florida Statues, Section 772.101 et seq., is the state analog to the federal RICO Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.