Florida Statute 772.19 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS

Chapter 772
CIVIL REMEDIES FOR CRIMINAL PRACTICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 772.19

772.19 Exemption.—No damages shall be recoverable under this chapter against the state or its agencies, instrumentalities, subdivisions, or municipalities.

History.—s. 3, ch. 86-277.

F.S. 772.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 772.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 772.19

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 772.19

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 772.19.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 772.19

Total Results: 7

Amerisure Ins. Co. v. GOLD COAST MARINE DIST., INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-11-01

Citation: 771 So. 2d 579, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13921, 2000 WL 1629442

Snippet: activity and damages pursuant to sections 772.101-772.19, Florida Statutes (1993), a violation of the Civil

Chandra v. Bradstreet

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-03-05

Citation: 727 So. 2d 372, 1999 WL 110691

Snippet: D.S., and Peter Taraschi, D.O. [2] §§ 772.101-772.19, Fla. Stat.

Smith v. State, Board of Regents ex rel. Florida A & M University

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-06-25

Citation: 701 So. 2d 348, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7203, 1997 WL 345277

Snippet: immunity from suit for damages pursuant to section 772.19, Florida Statutes, and the fact that state agencies

Burton v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-04-05

Citation: 128 So. 2d 765

Snippet: People v. Chessman, 35 Cal.2d 455, 218 P.2d 769, 772, 19 A.L.R.2d 1084, was confronted with a very similar

Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. Bedingfield

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-08-05

Citation: 60 So. 2d 489, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1394

Snippet: Furniture Co. v. McKesson & Robbins, 154 Fla. 772, 19 So.2d 59, 60, definitely settled this question

Red Top Cab and Baggage Co. v. Dorner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1947-07-25

Citation: 31 So. 2d 409, 159 Fla. 366, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 785

Snippet: Haverty Furniture Co. v. McKesson Robbins, 154 Fla. 772, 19 So.2d 59. Since 1936 it has been a rule of this

Ake v. Birnbaum

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1945-07-20

Citation: 25 So. 2d 213, 156 Fla. 735, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 982

Snippet: Furniture Co. v. McKesson Robbins, Inc. 154 Fla. 772, 19 So.2d 59. In that case, the action was brought