Florida Statute 790.24 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 790
WEAPONS AND FIREARMS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 790.24

790.24 Report of medical treatment of certain wounds; penalty for failure to report.—Any physician, nurse, or employee thereof and any employee of a hospital, sanitarium, clinic, or nursing home knowingly treating any person suffering from a gunshot wound or life-threatening injury indicating an act of violence, or receiving a request for such treatment, shall report the same immediately to the sheriff’s department of the county in which said treatment is administered or request therefor received. This section does not affect any requirement that a person has to report abuse pursuant to chapter 39 or chapter 415. Any such person willfully failing to report such treatment or request therefor is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

History.—s. 1, ch. 59-35; s. 755, ch. 71-136; s. 1, ch. 99-235.

F.S. 790.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 790.24 on Casetext

Amendments to 790.24

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 790.24

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S790.24 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO REPORT MEDICAL TREATMENT OF GUNSHOT - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 790.24

Total Results: 14

Florida Carry, Inc. v. University of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-10-30

Citation: 180 So. 3d 137, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16115, 2015 WL 6567665

Snippet: violation of ss. 790.07-790.115, 790.145-790.19, 790.22-790.24; [[Image here]] (3) LAWFUL USES. — The provisions

State v. Anderson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-08-09

Citation: 764 So. 2d 848, 2000 WL 1114346

Snippet: violation of ss. 790.07-790.12, 790.14-790.19, 790.22-790.24; § 790.25(2)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (1997). Section 790

Delprado v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-10-07

Citation: 720 So. 2d 1099, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 1998 WL 689690

Snippet: gunshot wounds to the Sheriff for investigation. § 790.24, Fla. Stat. (1997).

Dixon v. Sharp

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-04-04

Citation: 276 So. 2d 817

Snippet: 179 So. 674 (1938); Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576 (1946); Shaffran v. Holness, Fla., 93

WB Dunn Co., Inc. v. Mercantile Credit Corporation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-04-03

Citation: 275 So. 2d 311, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7066

Snippet: Fla. 321, 179 So. 674; Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576; Shaffran v. Holness, 102 So.2d 35 (Fla

Lee Construction Corp. v. Newman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-07-03

Citation: 143 So. 2d 222

Snippet: guilty of usury. See Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576; Jones v. Hammock, 131 Fla. 321, 179

DuPont Plaza, Inc. v. Samuel Kipnis Family Foundation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-07-27

Citation: 132 So. 2d 352, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2495

Snippet: Fla. 321, 179 So. 674; Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576; Shaffran v. Holness, Fla.App.1958, 102

Serotkin v. Flavin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-05-05

Citation: 111 So. 2d 483, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2865

Snippet: Fla. 321, 179 So. 674; Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576. Affirmed. CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and

American Airmotive Corp. v. Ellman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-04-08

Citation: 101 So. 2d 834, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2738

Snippet: affirmed, on authority of Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576. Affirmed. CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and

Parker v. Bryce

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-06-19

Citation: 96 So. 2d 154, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3535

Snippet: 551, 552.” See also Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576. In the case of Dezell v. King, Fla.

Rosenblum v. Hart

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-05-08

Citation: 95 So. 2d 18, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3434

Snippet: the lender described in Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576. In that case it was held that there

Felder v. Mager

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-03-13

Citation: 101 So. 2d 130, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 2821

Snippet: CURIAM. Affirmed. See Maulé v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576, and Tucker v. Fouts, 73 Fla. 1215, 76

Mindlin v. Davis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1954-09-28

Citation: 74 So. 2d 789

Snippet: an usurious exaction. Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576; Chandler et ux. v. Kendrick, Fla., 108

State v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1908-06-15

Citation: 56 Fla. 617

Snippet: Gardner v. New York, & N. E. R. Co., 17 R. I. 790, 24 Atl. Rep. 831. The same principle should apply