Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 14
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-10-30T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 180 So. 3d 137, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16115, 2015 WL 6567665
Snippet: violation of ss. 790.07-790.115, 790.145-790.19, 790.22-790.24; [[Image here]] (3) LAWFUL USES. — The provisions…violation of ss. 790.07-790.12, 790.14-790. 19., 790.22-790.24.” In 2006, the Legislature deleted the reference
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-08-09T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 764 So. 2d 848
Snippet: violation of ss. 790.07-790.12, 790.14-790.19, 790.22-790.24; § 790.25(2)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (1997). Section 790.23
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-10-07T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 720 So. 2d 1099, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 1998 WL 689690
Snippet: gunshot wounds to the Sheriff for investigation. § 790.24, Fla. Stat. (1997). No. 97-1999 District
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1973-04-03T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 276 So. 2d 817
Snippet: , 179 So. 674 (1938); Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576 (1946); Shaffran v. Holness, Fla., 93
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1973-04-02T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 275 So. 2d 311
Snippet: Fla. 321, 179 So. 674; Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576; Shaffran v. Holness, 102 So.2d 35 (Fla
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-07-03T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 143 So. 2d 222
Snippet: guilty of usury. See Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576; Jones v. Hammock, 131 Fla. 321, 179
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-07-27T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 132 So. 2d 352, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2495
Snippet: Fla. 321, 179 So. 674; Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576; Shaffran v. Holness, Fla.App.1958, 102
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-05-05T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 111 So. 2d 483, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2865
Snippet: Fla. 321, 179 So. 674; Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576. Affirmed. CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-04-08T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 101 So. 2d 834, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2738
Snippet: affirmed, on authority of Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576. Affirmed. CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1957-06-19T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 96 So. 2d 154, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3535
Snippet: . 551, 552.” See also Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576. In the case of Dezell v. King, Fla.,
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1957-05-08T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 95 So. 2d 18, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3434
Snippet: the lender described in Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576. In that case it was held that there
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1957-03-13T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 101 So. 2d 130, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 2821
Snippet: CURIAM. Affirmed. See Maulé v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576, and Tucker v. Fouts, 73 Fla. 1215, 76
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1954-09-27T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 74 So. 2d 789
Snippet: an usurious exaction. Maule v. Eckis, 156 Fla. 790, 24 So.2d 576; Chandler et ux. v. Kendrick, Fla., 108
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1908-06-15T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 56 Fla. 617
Snippet: Gardner v. New York, & N. E. R. Co., 17 R. I. 790, 24 Atl. Rep. 831. The same principle should apply