Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 812.131
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§812.131(2a)ROBBERYROBBERY SUDDEN SNATCHING WITH FIREARM/WEAPONF · 2nd
§812.131(2b)ROBBERYROBBERY SUDDEN SNATCH WITHOUT FIREARM/WEAPONF · 3rd
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Isaac Seabrooks, 839 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 2016).
· cites it 5× “In order to satisfy this definition, it is not necessary to show that: (a) The offender used any amount of force beyond that effort necessary to obtain possession of the money or other property; or (b) There was any resistance by the victim to the offender or that there was…”
Clark v. State, 43 So. 3d 814 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
· cites it 12× “But he contends he was entitled to the jury instruction defense counsel below requested on the permissive or category two lesser-included offense of "robbery by sudden snatching," the third-degree felony proscribed by section 812.”
Brown v. State, 848 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
· cites it 7× “This fact satisfies the statutory requirement of section 812.131, Florida Statutes, as it was a " continuous series of acts or events.”
Stokeling v. United States, 586 U.S. 73 (2019).
“" Fla. Stat. § 812.131 (1999). Thus, the application of the categorical approach to the Florida robbery statute is straightforward.”
United States v. Lockley, 632 F.3d 1238 (11th Cir. 2011).
· cites it 2× “13(1) from its less-serious counterpart, Fla. Stat. § 812.131 (1), which concerns “robbery by sudden snatching.”
State v. Burris, 875 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 2004).
· cites it 2× “In 2001, the Florida Legislature passed section 812.131, Florida Statutes (2001) (robbery by sudden snatching), which expressly addresses the type of offense committed by Burris.”
Connolly, Jr. v. State, 172 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).
· cites it 3× “§ 812.131 (3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015). An act shall be deemed “in the course of committing the carjacking” if it occurs in an attempt to commit carjacking or in flight after the attempt or commission.”
United States v. Denard Stokeling, 684 F. App'x 870 (11th Cir. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Case: 16-12951 Date Filed: 04/06/2017 Page: 2 of 14 statute in 1999, Fla. Stat. § 812.131 , categorically qualifies as a violent felony under the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.”
State v. Smith, 23 So. 3d 291 (La. 2009).
· cites it 2× “" Fla. Stat. Ann. § 812.131 (1)(West 2000); see Brown v.”
In re: Steven Jackson, 826 F.3d 1343 (11th Cir. 2016).
“30; see also Fla. Stat. § 812.131 . Lockley analyzed this later *1347 scheme and held that this new version of § 812.”
812.131(1): 12 cases
Clark v. State, 43 So. 3d 814 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“But he contends he was entitled to the jury instruction defense counsel below requested on the permissive or category two lesser-included offense of "robbery by sudden snatching," the third-degree felony proscribed by section 812.”
Brown v. State, 848 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
“This fact satisfies the statutory requirement of section 812.131, Florida Statutes, as it was a " continuous series of acts or events.”
812.131(1)(a): 2 cases
Brown v. State, 848 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
“This fact satisfies the statutory requirement of section 812.131, Florida Statutes, as it was a " continuous series of acts or events.”
812.131(1)(b): 1 case
812.131(2): 2 cases
812.131(2)(b): 6 cases
Clark v. State, 43 So. 3d 814 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“But he contends he was entitled to the jury instruction defense counsel below requested on the permissive or category two lesser-included offense of "robbery by sudden snatching," the third-degree felony proscribed by section 812.”
812.131(3)(a): 1 case
Connolly, Jr. v. State, 172 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).
“§ 812.131 (3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015). An act shall be deemed “in the course of committing the carjacking” if it occurs in an attempt to commit carjacking or in flight after the attempt or commission.”
812.131(3)(b): 1 case
Brown v. State, 848 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
“This fact satisfies the statutory requirement of section 812.131, Florida Statutes, as it was a " continuous series of acts or events.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.