Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 812.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 812.15 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 812.15

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 812
THEFT, ROBBERY, AND RELATED CRIMES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 812.15
812.15 Unauthorized reception of communications services; penalties.
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Cable operator” means a communications service provider who provides some or all of its communications services pursuant to a “cable television franchise” issued by a “franchising authority,” as those terms are defined in 47 U.S.C. s. 522(9) and (10) (1992).
(b) “Cable system” means any communications service network, system, or facility owned or operated by a cable operator.
(c) “Communications device” means any type of electronic mechanism, transmission line or connections and appurtenances thereto, instrument, device, machine, equipment, or software that is capable of intercepting, transmitting, acquiring, decrypting, or receiving any communications service, or any part, accessory, or component thereof, including any computer circuit, splitter, connector, switches, transmission hardware, security module, smart card, software, computer chip, electronic mechanism, or other component, accessory, or part of any communications device which is capable of facilitating the interception, transmission, retransmission, acquisition, decryption, or reception of any communications service.
(d) “Communications service” means any service lawfully provided for a charge or compensation by any cable system or by any radio, fiber optic, photooptical, electromagnetic, photoelectronic, satellite, microwave, data transmission, Internet-based, or wireless distribution network, system, or facility, including, but not limited to, any electronic, data, video, audio, Internet access, microwave, and radio communications, transmissions, signals, and services, and any such communications, transmissions, signals, and services lawfully provided for a charge or compensation, directly or indirectly by or through any of those networks, systems, or facilities.
(e) “Communications service provider” means:
1. Any person or entity owning or operating any cable system or any fiber optic, photooptical, electromagnetic, photoelectronic, satellite, wireless, microwave, radio, data transmission, or Internet-based distribution network, system, or facility.
2. Any person or entity providing any lawful communications service, whether directly or indirectly, as a reseller or licensee, by or through any such distribution network, system, or facility.
(f) “Manufacture, development, or assembly of a communications device” means to make, produce, develop, or assemble a communications device or any part, accessory, or component thereof, or to modify, alter, program, or reprogram any communications device so that it is capable of facilitating the commission of a violation of this section.
(g) “Multipurpose device” means any communications device that is capable of more than one function and includes any component thereof.
(2)(a) A person may not knowingly intercept, receive, decrypt, disrupt, transmit, retransmit, or acquire access to any communications service without the express authorization of the cable operator or other communications service provider, as stated in a contract or otherwise, with the intent to defraud the cable operator or communications service provider, or to knowingly assist others in doing those acts with the intent to defraud the cable operator or other communications provider. For the purpose of this section, the term “assist others” includes:
1. The sale, transfer, license, distribution, deployment, lease, manufacture, development, or assembly of a communications device for the purpose of facilitating the unauthorized receipt, acquisition, interception, disruption, decryption, transmission, retransmission, or access to any communications service offered by a cable operator or any other communications service provider; or
2. The sale, transfer, license, distribution, deployment, lease, manufacture, development, or assembly of a communications device for the purpose of defeating or circumventing any effective technology, device, or software, or any component or part thereof, used by a cable operator or other communications service provider to protect any communications service from unauthorized receipt, acquisition, interception, disruption, access, decryption, transmission, or retransmission.
(b) Any person who willfully violates this subsection commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(3)(a) Any person who willfully violates paragraph (2)(a), paragraph (4)(a), or subsection (5) and who has been previously convicted of any such provision commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b) Any person who willfully and for purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private financial gain violates paragraph (2)(a), paragraph (4)(a), or subsection (5) commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(4)(a) Any person who intentionally possesses a communications device, knowing or having reason to know that the design of such device renders it primarily useful for the purpose of committing, or assisting others in committing, a violation of paragraph (2)(a) commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(b) Any person who intentionally possesses five or more communications devices and knows or has reason to know that the design of such devices renders them primarily useful for committing, or assisting others in committing, a violation of paragraph (2)(a) commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c) Any person who intentionally possesses fifty or more communications devices and knows or has reason to know that the design of such devices renders them primarily useful for committing, or assisting others in committing, a violation of paragraph (2)(a) commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(5) It is unlawful for any person to place in any newspaper, magazine, handbill, or other publication, including any electronic medium, any advertisement that, in whole or in part, promotes the sale of a communications device if the person placing the advertisement knows or has reason to know that the device is designed to be primarily useful for committing, or assisting others in committing, a violation of paragraph (2)(a). Any person who violates this subsection shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(6) All fines shall be imposed as provided in s. 775.083 for each communications device involved in the prohibited activity or for each day a defendant is in violation of this section.
(7) The court shall, in addition to any other sentence authorized by law, sentence a person convicted of violating this section to make restitution as authorized by law.
(8) Upon conviction of a defendant for violating this section, the court may, in addition to any other sentence authorized by law, direct that the defendant forfeit any communications device in the defendant’s possession or control which was involved in the violation for which the defendant was convicted.
(9) A violation of paragraph (2)(a) may be deemed to have been committed at any place where the defendant manufactures, develops, or assembles any communications devices involved in the violation, or assists others in these acts, or any place where the communications device is sold or delivered to a purchaser or recipient. It is not a defense to a violation of paragraph (2)(a) that some of the acts constituting the violation occurred outside the state.
(10)(a) Any person aggrieved by any violation of this section may bring a civil action in a circuit court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction.
(b) The court may:
1. Grant temporary and final injunctions on terms it finds reasonable to prevent or restrain violations of this section in conformity with the principles that govern the granting of injunctive relief from threatened loss or damage in other civil cases, except that a showing of special or irreparable damages to the person need not be made.
2. At any time while the action is pending, order the impounding, on reasonable terms, of any communications device that is in the custody or control of the violator and that the court has reasonable cause to believe was involved in the alleged violation of this section, and may grant other equitable relief, including the imposition of a constructive trust, as the court considers reasonable and necessary.
3. Award damages pursuant to paragraphs (c), (d), and (e).
4. Direct the recovery of full costs, including awarding reasonable attorney’s fees, to an aggrieved party who prevails.
5. As part of a final judgment or decree finding a violation of this section, order the remedial modification or destruction of any communications device, or any other device or equipment, involved in the violation which is in the custody or control of the violator or has been impounded under subparagraph 2.
(c) Damages awarded by any court under this section shall be computed in accordance with subparagraph 1. or subparagraph 2.:
1. The party aggrieved may recover the actual damages suffered by him or her as a result of the violation and any profits of the violator that are attributable to the violation which are not taken into account in computing the actual damages.
a. Actual damages include the retail value of all communications services to which the violator had unauthorized access as a result of the violation and the retail value of any communications service illegally available to each person to whom the violator directly or indirectly provided or distributed a communications device. In proving actual damages, the party aggrieved must prove only that the violator manufactured, distributed, or sold a communications device and is not required to prove that any such device was actually used in violation of this section.
b. In determining the violator’s profits, the party aggrieved must prove only the violator’s gross revenue, and the violator must prove his or her deductible expenses and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the violation.
2. Upon election of such damages at any time before final judgment is entered, the party aggrieved may recover an award of statutory damages for each communications device involved in the action, in a sum of not less than $250 or more than $10,000 for each such device, as the court considers just.
(d) In any case in which the court finds that the violation was committed willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or financial gain, the court in its discretion may increase the award of damages, whether actual or statutory under this section, by an amount of not more than $50,000 for each communications device involved in the action and for each day the defendant is in violation of this section.
(e) In any case in which the court finds that the violator was not aware and had no reason to believe that his or her acts constituted a violation of this section, the court in its discretion may reduce the award of damages to a sum of not less than $100.
(11) This section shall not be construed to impose any criminal or civil liability upon any state or local law enforcement agency; any state or local government agency, municipality, or authority; or any communications service provider unless such entity is acting knowingly and with intent to defraud a communications service provider as defined in this section.
(12) A person that manufactures, produces, assembles, designs, sells, distributes, licenses, or develops a multipurpose device shall not be in violation of this section unless that person acts knowingly and with an intent to defraud a communications services provider and the multipurpose device:
(a) Is manufactured, developed, assembled, produced, designed, distributed, sold, or licensed for the primary purpose of committing a violation of this section;
(b) Has only a limited commercially significant purpose or use other than for the commission of any violation of this section; or
(c) Is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person’s knowledge for the purpose of committing any violation of this section.
(13) Nothing in this section shall require that the design of, or design and selection of parts, software code, or components for, a communications device provide for a response to any particular technology, device, or software, or any component or part thereof, used by the provider, owner, or licensee of any communications service or of any data, audio or video programs, or transmissions, to protect any such communications, data, audio or video service, programs, or transmissions from unauthorized receipt, acquisition, interception, access, decryption, disclosure, communication, transmission, or retransmission.
History.s. 3, ch. 92-155; s. 1241, ch. 97-102; s. 1, ch. 98-214; s. 1, ch. 99-261; s. 1, ch. 2003-186.

F.S. 812.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 812.15 on Casetext

Amendments to 812.15


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 812.15
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S812.15 2a - FRAUD - INTERCEPT COMMUNICATION SVCS WO AUTH SUBSQ OFF - F: T
S812.15 2a - FRAUD - INTERCEPT COMMUNICATION SVCS WO AUTH - M: F
S812.15 2a - FRAUD - INTERCEPT COMMUNICATION SVC FINANCIAL GAIN - F: T
S812.15 3a - FRAUD - INTERCEPT COMMUNICATION SVCS WO AUTH SUBSQ OFF - F: T
S812.15 3a - FRAUD - POSS DEVICE TO INTERCEPT COMM SVCS SUBSQ OFF - F: T
S812.15 3a - FRAUD - ADV PROMOTE SALE OF INTERCEPT DEVICE SUBSQ OFF - F: T
S812.15 3b - FRAUD - RENUMBERED. SEE REC #4106 - F: T
S812.15 3b - FRAUD - INTERCEPT COMMUNICATION SVCS FINANCIAL GAIN - F: T
S812.15 3b - FRAUD - POSS DEVICE TO INTERCEPT COMM SVCS FINAN GAIN - F: T
S812.15 3b - FRAUD - ADV PROMOTE SALE INTERCEPT DEVICE FINAN GAIN - F: T
S812.15 4a - FRAUD - POSS DEVICE TO INTERCEPT COMMUNICATION SVCS - M: F
S812.15 4a - FRAUD - POSS DEVICE TO INTERCEPT COMM SVCS SUBSQ OFF - F: T
S812.15 4a - FRAUD - POSS DEVICE INTERCEPT COMM SVCS FINAN GAIN - F: T
S812.15 4b - FRAUD - POSS 5 MORE DEVICES INTERCEPT COMM SVCS - F: T
S812.15 4c - FRAUD - POSS 50 MORE DEVICES INTERCEPT COMM SVCS - F: S
S812.15 5 - FRAUD - AD PROMOTE SALE OF INTERCEPT DEVICE SUBSQ OFF - F: T
S812.15 5 - FRAUD - AD PROMOTE SALE OF INTERCEPT DEVICE FINAN GAIN - F: T
S812.15 5 - FRAUD - AD TO PROMOTE SALE OF INTERCEPT DEVICE - M: F



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 812.15

Total Results: 20

Raymond Anthony Lee v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-14

Snippet: convenience store. We affirm, concluding that section 812.015(4), Florida Statutes (2022), gave the officers

Malik Mocombe v. The State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-14

Snippet: retail establishment, in violation of section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes (2022). Because the

ALEXANDER MARTINEZ-RIVERO v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-02-03

Snippet: device countermeasure in violation of section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes. On appeal, Martinez-Rivero

Advisory Opinion to the Governor Re: Implementation of Amendment 4, The Voting Restoration Amendment

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-01-16

Snippet: meaning of “all terms of sentence.” See, e.g., § 812.15(7), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“The court shall, in addition

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2018-06

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-20

Snippet: degree Battery 784.03 8 .3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 10 fROBBERY WITH A

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-06.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-20

Citation: 260 So. 3d 941

Snippet: degree Battery 784.03 8.3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 *947*ROBBERY WITH A WEAPON - 812.13(2)(b)

SYMONE JUSTINE BENT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-24

Citation: 257 So. 3d 501

Snippet: presence? Because the legislature enacted section 812.015(3)(a), Florida Statutes, which provides that law

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2017-04

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-30

Snippet: instructs upon the offense defined under section 812.015, Florida Statutes (2017) (Retail and farm theft;

McClover v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-04-19

Citation: 217 So. 3d 96, 2017 WL 1399821, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5358

Snippet: commit retail theft is retail theft. Id. (citing § 812.015(l)(d), Fla. Stat. (2012)). We also confirmed that

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—REPORT NO. 2014-07

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-04-30

Citation: 163 So. 3d 478, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 221, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 927, 2015 WL 1932145

Snippet: 5 RESISTING RECOVERY OF STOLEN PROPERTY § 812.015(6), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Resisting

State of Florida v. Thomas Marvin Lord

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-12

Citation: 150 So. 3d 260

Snippet: to suppress, because under sections 901.15 and 812.015, Florida Statutes (2013), the officers did not

F.T. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-09-17

Citation: 146 So. 3d 1270, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14390, 2014 WL 4628512

Snippet: more specific statutory treatment under section 812.015. Under the general theft provisions, “value” is

F.T. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-09-17

Snippet: more specific statutory treatment under section 812.015. Under the general theft provisions, “value”

Cenatis v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-07-24

Citation: 120 So. 3d 41, 2013 WL 3811766, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11593

Snippet: device countermeasure is prohibited by section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes (2010): It is unlawful to

McClover v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-05-15

Citation: 125 So. 3d 926, 2013 WL 1980172, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7870

Snippet: of felony retail theft in violation of section 812.015(8)(a), Florida Statutes, Toccara McClover appeals

Milian v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-07-18

Citation: 92 So. 3d 304, 2012 WL 2913223, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11693

Snippet: in concert with others in violation of section 812.015(8)(a). For the reasons set forth in *305Ms co-defendant’s

Rimondi v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-06-06

Citation: 89 So. 3d 1059, 2012 WL 2010866, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9074

Snippet: in concert with others in violation of section 812.015(8)(a). Rimondi raises two issues on appeal; however

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report No. 2011-03

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-05-17

Citation: 95 So. 3d 868, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 352, 2012 WL 2848895, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 961

Snippet: sought to track the statutory language of section 812.015(6), Florida Statutes (2011), which provides as

In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-01

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-04

Citation: 35 So. 3d 666, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 149, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 302

Snippet: restraint under stated circumstances, e.g., F.S. 812.015, 901.15, 901.151 (2006). 407.9 BURDEN OF PROOF

Peterson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-12-18

Citation: 24 So. 3d 686, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19772, 2009 WL 4877693

Snippet: misdemeanor offense of resisting a merchant. See § 812.015(6). Both the State's case and Peterson's theory