Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 831.18 (2025)
Making or possessing instruments for forging bills.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
831.18 Making or possessing instruments for forging bills.—Whoever engraves, makes, or amends, or begins to engrave, make, or amend, any plate, block, press, or other tool, instrument, or implement, or makes or provides any paper or other material, adapted and designed for the making of a false and counterfeit note, certificate, or other bill of credit, purporting to be issued by lawful authority for a debt of this state, or a false or counterfeit note or bill, in the similitude of the notes or bills issued by any bank or banking company established in this state, or within the United States, or in any foreign province, state, or government; and whoever has in his or her possession any such plate or block engraved in any part, or any press or other tool, instrument, or any paper or other material adapted and designed as aforesaid, with intent to issue the same, or to cause or permit the same to be used in forging or making any such false and counterfeit certificates, bills, or notes, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 9, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2496; GS 3377; RGS 5225; CGL 7343; s. 1296, ch. 97-102; s. 9, ch. 2010-117.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 831.18
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§831.18POSSESS TOOLS FORTOOLS PAPER FOR FORGERY COUNTERFEITING
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1983–1983 · leading case: Lipman v. State, 428 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
Lipman v. State, 428 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). “§ 831.18, Fla. Stat. (1981) (e.s.). Lipman first contends that the indictment returned against him should have been dismissed in its entirety because it improperly charged him, alternatively, with aiding and abetting Massoud in violating either the first or second portions of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.