Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. MARK MARKS, P. A., 833 So. 2d 249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . principals in the perjury of another are entitled to the benefits of the defense contained at section 837.07 . . . In 1990, the legislature passed section 837.07, which provided for recantation as a defense to perjury . . . Section 837.07 makes the defense applicable to “any” prosecution for perjury. . . . If anything, section 837.07 is an expansion of the common law defense. . . . .” § 837.07(1), (2). . . .

ADAMS, v. STATE, 727 So. 2d 983 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . In 1990, ten years after the Carter decision, the Legislature enacted section 837.07, which provides: . . . 837.07. . . . admission is made before it has become manifest that such false statement has been or will be exposed. § 837.07 . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CRIMINAL CASES NO., 603 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 1992)

. . . See F.S. 837.07; Carter v. State, 384 So.2d 1255 (Fla.1980). . . . “F.S. 837.07” is added to the note. . . .

W. La v., 90 T.C. 465 (T.C. 1988)

. . . 1969 882.37 1970 788.82 1971 24,561.70 1014-81, Robert and Ellise Schiffer 1968 1,339.42 21096-81 1969 837.07 . . .