Florida Statute 876.37 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 876.37 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 876.37

The 2022 Florida Statutes (including 2022 Special Session A and 2023 Special Session B)

Title XLVI
Chapter 876
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 876.37
876.37 Sabotage prevention law; definitions.As used in ss. 876.37-876.50:
(1) “Highway” includes any private or public street, way, or other place used for travel to or from property.
(2) “Highway commissioners” means any individual, board, or other body having authority under then-existing law to discontinue the use of the highway which it is desired to restrict or close to public use and travel.
(3) “Public utility” includes any pipeline, gas, electric, heat, water, oil, sewer, telephone, telegraph, radio, railway, railroad, airplane, transportation, communication, or other system, by whomsoever owned or operated for public use.
History.s. 1, ch. 20252, 1941; s. 65, ch. 74-383; s. 246, ch. 77-104.
Note.Former s. 779.06.

F.S. 876.37 on Google Scholar

F.S. 876.37 on Casetext

Amendments to 876.37

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 876.37
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 876.37.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

10 Cases from Casetext:Date Descending

U.S. Supreme Court11th Cir. - Ct. App.11th Cir. - MD FL11th Cir. - ND FL11th Cir. - SD FLFed. Reg.Secondary Sources - All
  1. Pichowski v. Florida Gas Trans

    857 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 2 times
    Section 366.82(1), Florida Statutes (2001), defines "utility" as any person or entity that provides electricity or natural gas at retail to the public. Again, FGTC does not meet this definition because it does not sell natural gas at retail to the public. Other statutes cited by FGTC, such as sections 125.42(1), 177.031(7)(b), and 876.37(3), Florida Statutes (2001), also provide definitions of the term "public utility." Those statutes do not support FGTC's position because the definitions are limited for use in specific statutory schemes that are not pertinent to eminent domain proceedings, or they do not apply based on the evidence presented as to the nature of the business conducted by FGTC.
    PAGE 221

    Cases from cite.case.law:

    J. PICHOWSKI, L. L. C. I- L. L. C. v. FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY,, 857 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

    . . . Other statutes cited by FGTC, such as sections 125.42(1), 177.031(7)(b), and 876.37(3), Florida Statutes . . .

    THOMAS C. EDWARDS v. THE UNITED STATES, 80 Ct. Cl. 118 (Ct. Cl. 1934)

    . . . Plaintiff seeks to recover the two aforementioned amounts, as well as an amount of $876.37 alleged to . . . plaintiff also asks that he be allowed $1,391.27 on account of losses on the sale of the rejected hay, $876.37 . . . With respect to the expense item of $876.37 and the amount of $3,141.20, claimed on account of anticipated . . .