Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 893.147
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§893.147(1)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSAND OR USEM · 1st
§893.147(2)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSMANUFACTURE DELIVERF · 3rd
§893.147(4)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSUSE POSS MFGR PARAPHERNALIA TO TRANSPORT DRUGSF · 3rd
§893.147(5)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSDRUG PARAPHERNALIA ADVERTISEM · 1st
§893.147(6)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSRETAIL SALE OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA 2ND SUBS OFFF · 3rd
§893.147(6)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSRETAIL SALE OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA 1ST OFFM · 1st
§893.147(3a)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSPARAPHERNALIA DELIVER TO MINORF · 2nd
§893.147(3b)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSDELIVER SYRINGES NEEDLES TO MINORM · 1st
§893.147(7a)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSPURCH SELL DEL TABLETING ENCAPSULATING MACHINEF · 3rd
§893.147(7a)COUNTERFEITING OFPOSS PURCH SELL DEL CTRL SUB COUNTERF MATERIALF · 3rd
§893.147(7d1)COUNTERFEITING OFRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9051F · 3rd
§893.147(7d1)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9050F · 3rd
§893.147(7d2)DRUGS-PRODUCERENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9052F · 2nd
§893.147(7d2)DRUGS-PRODUCERENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9053F · 2nd
§893.147(7d2a)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSTABLET ENCAPSU MACH OTH MFG CTRL SUB 893.03(1)F · 2nd
§893.147(7d2b)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSTABLETING ENCAPSULATING MACH OTHER MFG COCAINEF · 2nd
§893.147(7d2c)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSTABLETING ENCAPSULATING MACHINE OTH MFG OPIUMF · 2nd
§893.147(7d2d)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSTABLETING ENCAPSULATING MACH OTH MFG METHADONEF · 2nd
§893.147(7d2e)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSTABLETING ENCAPSULAT MACH OTH MFG ALFENTANILF · 2nd
§893.147(7d2f)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSTABLETING ENCAPSULAT MACH OTH MFG CARFENTANILF · 2nd
§893.147(7d2g)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSTABLETING ENCAPSULATING MACH OTH MFG FENTANYLF · 2nd
§893.147(7d2h)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSTABLETING ENCAPSULAT MACH OTH MFG SUFENTANILF · 2nd
§893.147(7d2i)DRUG EQUIP-POSSESSTABLET ENCAPSULAT MACH OTH MFG CTRL SUB ANALOGF · 2nd
Notes of Decisions
Steele v. State, 561 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
· cites it 7× “See § 893.147(1), Fla. Stat. (1987). Moreover, since intent was an issue in the case, the instruction given, which omitted the elements of use and intent, was prejudicial in that the jury was not instructed to determine whether the state proved the elements of use or intent to…”
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—report No. 2015-03, 191 So. 3d 291 (Fla. 2016).
· cites it 6× “14 USE OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO USE DRUG PARAPHERNALIA § 893.147(1), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Use or Possession With Intent to Use Drug Paraphernalia, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
State of Florida v. Harry James Chubbuck, 141 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. 2014).
· cites it 4× “(2007)), one count of possession of paraphernalia (production) (§ 893.147(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007)), and one count of felon in possession of firearm or ammunition (constructive possession) (§ 790.”
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—report No. 2013-05, 153 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2014).
· cites it 6× “(Defendant) used — or—had—in t-his][her] possession with intent to use drug paraphernalia knew of the presence of the drug paraphernalia. 2. (Defendant) had knowledge of the presence of the-drug paraphernalia [used the drug paraphernalia] [or] [possessed the drug paraphernalia…”
Roberto Valderrama v. Officer Carl Rousseau, 780 F.3d 1108 (11th Cir. 2015).
· cites it 2× “2009) (noting that probable cause “requires only a probability or substantial chance of criminal activities” (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Fla. Stat. § 893.147 (1) (“It is unlawful for any person to use, or to possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia .”
State v. Walthour, 876 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
· cites it 3× “2, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia in violation of Fla. Stat. 893.147(1) for an incident occurring on May 5, 2003.”
Flagg v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
“13(6)(a), a third-degree felony, and possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of section 893.147(l)(b), a first-degree misdemeanor Flagg filed a motion to suppress the drugs and crack pipe on the basis that the stop was illegal.”
State v. Bryant, 953 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
· cites it 7× “In this direct criminal appeal, the appellant challenges an order by which the trial court granted the appellee's motion to dismiss a count of an information charging the appellee with using drug paraphernalia to transport cocaine in violation of section 893.147(4), Florida…”
State v. Bodden, 877 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 2004).
· cites it 2× “13(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2002), and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of section 893.147, Florida Statutes (2002).”
— 893.147(1) — 75 cases
State v. Walthour, 876 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
“2, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia in violation of Fla. Stat. 893.147(1) for an incident occurring on May 5, 2003.”
Steele v. State, 561 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
“See § 893.147(1), Fla. Stat. (1987). Moreover, since intent was an issue in the case, the instruction given, which omitted the elements of use and intent, was prejudicial in that the jury was not instructed to determine whether the state proved the elements of use or intent to…”
— 893.147(1)(a) — 4 cases
State of Florida v. Harry James Chubbuck, 141 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. 2014).
“(2007)), one count of possession of paraphernalia (production) (§ 893.147(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007)), and one count of felon in possession of firearm or ammunition (constructive possession) (§ 790.”
— 893.147(1)(b) — 7 cases
Steele v. State, 561 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
“See § 893.147(1), Fla. Stat. (1987). Moreover, since intent was an issue in the case, the instruction given, which omitted the elements of use and intent, was prejudicial in that the jury was not instructed to determine whether the state proved the elements of use or intent to…”
— 893.147(2) — 11 cases
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—report No. 2015-03, 191 So. 3d 291 (Fla. 2016).
“14 USE OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO USE DRUG PARAPHERNALIA § 893.147(1), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Use or Possession With Intent to Use Drug Paraphernalia, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—report No. 2013-05, 153 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2014).
“(Defendant) used — or—had—in t-his][her] possession with intent to use drug paraphernalia knew of the presence of the drug paraphernalia. 2. (Defendant) had knowledge of the presence of the-drug paraphernalia [used the drug paraphernalia] [or] [possessed the drug paraphernalia…”
— 893.147(2)(a) — 1 case
— 893.147(3) — 2 cases
— 893.147(3)(a) — 3 cases
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—report No. 2015-03, 191 So. 3d 291 (Fla. 2016).
“14 USE OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO USE DRUG PARAPHERNALIA § 893.147(1), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Use or Possession With Intent to Use Drug Paraphernalia, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—report No. 2013-05, 153 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2014).
“(Defendant) used — or—had—in t-his][her] possession with intent to use drug paraphernalia knew of the presence of the drug paraphernalia. 2. (Defendant) had knowledge of the presence of the-drug paraphernalia [used the drug paraphernalia] [or] [possessed the drug paraphernalia…”
— 893.147(4) — 3 cases
State v. Bryant, 953 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
“In this direct criminal appeal, the appellant challenges an order by which the trial court granted the appellee's motion to dismiss a count of an information charging the appellee with using drug paraphernalia to transport cocaine in violation of section 893.147(4), Florida…”
— 893.147(6) — 2 cases
— 893.147(6)(a) — 1 case
— 893.147(6)(b) — 1 case
— 893.147(l)(a) — 5 cases
State of Florida v. Harry James Chubbuck, 141 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. 2014).
“(2007)), one count of possession of paraphernalia (production) (§ 893.147(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007)), and one count of felon in possession of firearm or ammunition (constructive possession) (§ 790.”
— 893.147(l)(b) — 5 cases
Flagg v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
“13(6)(a), a third-degree felony, and possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of section 893.147(l)(b), a first-degree misdemeanor Flagg filed a motion to suppress the drugs and crack pipe on the basis that the stop was illegal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.