Syfert Injury Law Firm

Rubin S. Williams Bailbonds, Inc. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-08-27

Citation: 493 So. 2d 1065, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1869, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532

Snippet: Alachua County. That opinion suggests that section 903.29, Florida Statutes (Supp.1984), denies to the surety

Department of Corrections v. Piccirillo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-08-22

Citation: 474 So. 2d 1199

Snippet: Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270, 5 S.Ct. 903, 29 L.Ed. 185 (1884). It is not enough, however, that

Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-06-15

Citation: 415 So. 2d 109

Snippet: defendant and return him to the custody of the court. § 903.29, Fla. Stat. (1979). A surety which has not paid

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-01-11

Snippet: still legally arrest the principal pursuant to s. 903.29, F. S., if the bondsman had an indemnity agreement

Public Service Mutual Insurance Company v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-12-21

Citation: 135 So. 2d 777

Snippet: contends that its rights are governed by Section 903.29(1), Florida Statutes 1959, F.S.A., which provides:

Huie v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-01-23

Citation: 92 So. 2d 264

Snippet: for a remission of the forfeiture under Sections 903.29 and 903.30, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. This motion

Capitol Indemnity Insurance Company v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-03-14

Citation: 86 So. 2d 156, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3635

Snippet: problem here presented are the provisions of Sections 903.29 and 903.30, ibid., authorizing the court to set

City of Miami Beach v. the Texas Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-01-23

Citation: 194 So. 368, 141 Fla. 616

Snippet: Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270, 5 Sup. Ct. 903,29 L.Ed. 185; Nashville C. St. L. Ry. v. Walters