Cases from cite.case.law:

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013)

. . . .2012) ] and amended in 2013. 21.9 [ATTEMPTED] RETALIATING AGAINST A [WITNESS] [VICTIM] [INFORMANT] § 914.23 . . . [VICTIM] [INFORMANT]—914.23 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. INS. NO. STAT. . . . Pursuant to § 914.23, Fla. . . .

R. T. a v. STATE, 34 So. 3d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . R.T. was charged with retaliating against a witness in violation of section 914.23(1), Florida Statutes . . . To prove a violation of section 914.23(1), the State was required to demonstrate that R.T. knowingly . . . Section 914.23(1) provides in pertinent part: A person who knowingly engages in any conduct that causes . . . The State contends that R.T. was not charged under the correct subsection of section 914.23, and that . . . the evidence supports a violation of section 914.23(2). . . .

DONALDSON, v. STATE, 1 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .” § 914.23 Fla. Stat. (2005) (emphasis added). . . . Because the elements of section 914.23, Florida Statutes, do not necessarily require the use or threat . . .

S. K. S. K. R. K. v. STATE, 881 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . in a criminal case exists or that such order is necessary to prevent and restrain an offense under s.914.23 . . .

C. S. a v. STATE, 869 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . motion for judgment of acquittal to the charge of retaliating against a witness in violation of section 914.23 . . . Section 914.23, Florida Statutes, provides in part: A person who knowingly engages in any conduct that . . . Next, C.S. argues that the evidence does not support an adjudication of delinquency under section 914.23 . . .

CRUZ, v. STATE, 869 So. 2d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 914.23(2), Fla. Stat. (1991). . . .

POHL, v. STATE, 837 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . section 914.22(1), Florida Statute (2000), and retaliation against a witness, in violation of section 914.23 . . .

MOLINA, v. WATKINS,, 824 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . duty; (4) civil remedies for criminal practices act (witness tampering in violation of sections 914.22-914.23 . . . injunctive relief to protect against racketeering (witness tampering in violation of sections 914.22-914.23 . . . remedies for criminal practices act relating to witness tampering, in violation of sections 914.22 and 914.23 . . .

ROONEY, v. STATE, 699 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . §§ 806.01(2); 810.02(1) & (3); 806.13; 914.23, Fla. Stat. (1991). . . .

ROONEY, v. STATE, 654 So. 2d 673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 914.23, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

ANTHONY DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. MILLER BREWING COMPANY,, 882 F. Supp. 1024 (M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Section 914.22 or s. 914.23, relating to witnesses, victims or informants.” . . .

STATE v. JONES,, 642 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . The state charged Jones with three counts of retaliating against a witness in violation of section 914.23 . . . As pertinent, section 914.23 provides: Retaliating against a witness, victim, or informant. — A person . . . In granting Jones’ motion to dismiss, the trial court interpreted the provisions of section 914.23 as . . . By its express terms, section 914.23 requires the state to demonstrate that a defendant has knowingly . . . In this regard, section 914.23 is aimed at deterring both retaliatory bodily injury to a witness and . . .

UNITED STATES v. F. DAVIS,, 247 F. Supp. 84 (E.D. Mich. 1965)

. . . Authority Amount of Lien 12/1/60 Wayne County $ 197.08 4/25/61 Michigan Employment Securities Comn. 914.23 . . .