Florida Statute 916.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 916
MENTALLY ILL AND INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED DEFENDANTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 916.10

916.10 Short title.—This chapter may be cited as the “Forensic Client Services Act.”

History.—s. 29, ch. 85-167.

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 916.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 916.10.

Total Results: 6

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-04-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 137 So. 3d 1133, 2014 WL 1304724, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4823

Snippet: who have been found incompetent to proceed, §§ 916.10, 916.105, Fla. Stat. (2011), including the involuntary

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-03-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 10 So. 3d 152, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2487, 2009 WL 763584

Snippet: is known as the Forensic Client Services Act. § 916.10, Fla. Stat. *158 (2008). The legislature defined

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-09-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 474 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2062, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15691

Snippet: Ferguson, Pearson 3 September 1985 474 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2062, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15691

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-07-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 475 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1816, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14411

Snippet: Peeples Grimes, Ott, Scheb 26 July 1985 475 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1816, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14411

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-07-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 475 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2283, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16139

Snippet: Dell, Glickstein, Hersey 24 July 1985 475 So. 2d 916, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2283, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16139

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1979-03-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 368 So. 2d 425, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14216

Snippet: sold at private sale leaving a deficiency of $64,916.10 on appellant’s note. Appellee bank then sued appellant