Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 933.06 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 933.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 933.06 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 933.06

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 933
SEARCH AND INSPECTION WARRANTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 933.06
933.06 Sworn application required before issuance.The judge must, before issuing the warrant, have the application of some person for said warrant duly sworn to and subscribed, and may receive further testimony from witnesses or supporting affidavits, or depositions in writing, to support the application. The affidavit and further proof, if same be had or required, must set forth the facts tending to establish the grounds of the application or probable cause for believing that they exist.
History.s. 6, ch. 9321, 1923; CGL 8508; s. 36, ch. 2004-11.

F.S. 933.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 933.06 on CourtListener

Amendments to 933.06


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 933.06

Total Results: 18

Singletary v. State

290 So. 2d 116

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1974 | Docket: 1510321

Cited 30 times | Published

judge granting the probation. [3] See F.S. Section 933.06, F.S.A. [4] RCrP Rule 3.121(a)(7). Whether

Hamelmann v. State

113 So. 2d 394

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1959 | Docket: 1743758

Cited 22 times | Published

concur. NOTES [1] F.S. § 933.04, F.S.A. [2] F.S. § 933.06, F.S.A. [3] 162 A.L.R. 1414 et seq.

Panzavecchia v. State

201 So. 2d 762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1967 | Docket: 770460

Cited 16 times | Published

contended that, pursuant to the provisions of § 933.06, Fla. Stat.,[1] F.S.A., it had a right to offer

Carter v. State

199 So. 2d 324

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1967 | Docket: 543300

Cited 16 times | Published

"within ten days after issuance thereof". F.S. Section 933.06 F.S.A. requires sworn affidavits and possibly

North v. State

32 So. 2d 915, 159 Fla. 854, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 974

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1947 | Docket: 3266679

Cited 16 times | Published

presented to him at the time of the application. Section 933.06 Florida Statutes 1941 prescribes that: "The

State v. Wolff

310 So. 2d 729

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1975 | Docket: 1682782

Cited 15 times | Published

all search warrant affidavits, specifically Section 933.06, Florida Statutes, and concluded: "Therefore

Swartz v. State

316 So. 2d 618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1975 | Docket: 1456206

Cited 14 times | Published

Ct.Fla. 1932, 106 Fla. 254, 143 So. 217) F.S. § 933.06, which deals with applications for search warrants

Bonilla v. State

579 So. 2d 802, 1991 WL 72084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1991 | Docket: 1728720

Cited 9 times | Published

in Hernando County, Florida. [3] Compare: Section 933.06 of the Florida Statutes (1989) which provides

State v. Bernie

472 So. 2d 1243, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1551

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1985 | Docket: 1793253

Cited 9 times | Published

Const. amend. IV; Art. I, § 12, Fla. Const.; § 933.06, Fla. Stat. (1983). Thus, in Collins, although

Collins v. State

465 So. 2d 1266, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 489

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1985 | Docket: 480020

Cited 9 times | Published

v. State, 369 So.2d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Section 933.06, Florida Statutes (1983),[2] as well as our

State v. Lewis

225 So. 2d 170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1969 | Docket: 1444894

Cited 8 times | Published

still be protected;[4] and I do not construe *173 § 933.06, F.S.A. as making it incumbent on the issuing

State v. Tolmie

421 So. 2d 1087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1982 | Docket: 1372136

Cited 7 times | Published

based thereon. *1088 The statute in question, Section 933.06, Florida Statutes (1981), provides: The judge

Howard v. State

483 So. 2d 844, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1986 | Docket: 1511972

Cited 6 times | Published

had not taken the requisite oath, pursuant to section 933.06, Florida Statutes, prior to signing a supporting

Wolff v. State

291 So. 2d 15

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1974 | Docket: 1351186

Cited 6 times | Published

affidavits for other search warrants (Fla. Stat. section 933.06, F.S.A.), where it is provided that a judge

Fixel v. State

256 So. 2d 27

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1971 | Docket: 1062272

Cited 3 times | Published

NOTES [1] Compare F.S.A. § 933.18 with F.S.A. § 933.06.

STATE OF FLORIDA v. LEWIS STOUFFER, CLARK JEFFREY THOMPSON and CRAIG TURTURO

248 So. 3d 1165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2018 | Docket: 6862849

Cited 2 times | Published

plain language of the applicable statutes. Section 933.06, Florida Statutes (2011), states:

State v. Moreno-Gonzalez

18 So. 3d 1180, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14603, 2009 WL 3100937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2009 | Docket: 1640470

Cited 2 times | Published

(1968). By statute, the affidavit must be signed. § 933.06, Fla. Stat. (2007) (“The judge must, before issuing

Moreno-Gonzalez v. State

67 So. 3d 1020, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 360, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1567, 2011 WL 2637438

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2011 | Docket: 60301917

Cited 1 times | Published

affidavit on the line provided as required by section 933.06. The trial court then issued an order stating