Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 933.15 (2025)
Obstruction of service or execution of search warrant; penalty.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
933.15 Obstruction of service or execution of search warrant; penalty.—Whoever shall knowingly and willfully obstruct, resist, or oppose any officer or person aiding such officer, in serving or attempting to serve or execute any search warrant, or shall assault, beat or wound any person or officer, or his or her deputies or assistants, knowing him or her to be such an officer or person so authorized, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 933.15
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§933.15OBSTRUCT POLICEOBSTRUCT OFFICER EXECUTING SEARCH WARRANT
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2016–2018 · leading case: Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard, 195 L. Ed. 2d 560 (2016).
Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard, 195 L. Ed. 2d 560 (2016). “If, on the other hand, such warrantless searches comport with the Fourth Amendment, it follows that a State may criminalize the refusal to comply with a demand to submit to the required testing, just as a State may make it a crime for a person to obstruct the execution of a…”
Laterza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 221 F. Supp. 3d 1347 (S.D. Fla. 2016). “”); § 933.27, Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing that it is a second degree misdemeanor for anyone “who willfully refuses to permit an inspection authorized by a warrant issued .”
State v. Wilson, 413 P.3d 363 (Haw. App. 2018). “If, on the other hand, such warrantless searches comport with the Fourth Amendment, it follows that a State may criminalize the refusal to comply with a demand, to submit to the required testing, just as a State may make it a crime for a person to obstruct the execution of a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.