Florida Statute 958.14 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 958
YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 958.14

958.14 Violation of probation or community control program.—A violation or alleged violation of probation or the terms of a community control program shall subject the youthful offender to the provisions of s. 948.06. However, no youthful offender shall be committed to the custody of the department for a substantive violation for a period longer than the maximum sentence for the offense for which he or she was found guilty, with credit for time served while incarcerated, or for a technical or nonsubstantive violation for a period longer than 6 years or for a period longer than the maximum sentence for the offense for which he or she was found guilty, whichever is less, with credit for time served while incarcerated.

History.—s. 14, ch. 78-84; s. 193, ch. 83-216; s. 24, ch. 85-288; s. 19, ch. 90-208; s. 1708, ch. 97-102; s. 6, ch. 97-239; s. 38, ch. 2004-373; s. 8, ch. 2007-2; s. 138, ch. 2019-167.

F.S. 958.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 958.14 on CourtListener

Amendments to 958.14

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 958.14

Total Results: 112

State v. Carter

835 So. 2d 259, 2002 WL 31718769

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2002 | Docket: 1643475

Cited 72 times | Published

violation of probation or community control. Under section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1995), the trial court must

Jimmy Smith v. State

143 So. 3d 1023, 2014 WL 3605544, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2014 | Docket: 2309

Cited 22 times | Published

1059-60 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); see also § 958.14 Fla. Stat. (2009). In 2008, Smith was charged

Clem v. State

462 So. 2d 1134

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1984 | Docket: 1509978

Cited 22 times | Published

court has jurisdiction to proceed pursuant to section 958.14, which incorporates section 948.06(1), to revoke

Franklin v. State

526 So. 2d 159, 1988 WL 54214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1988 | Docket: 1679911

Cited 21 times | Published

[8] § 958.011, et seq., Fla. Stat. (1987). [9] § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1985). [10] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11)

State v. Watts

558 So. 2d 994, 1990 WL 29523

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1990 | Docket: 1726285

Cited 19 times | Published

2d 1052 (Fla. 1985). The defense argued that section 958.14 of the Florida Statutes (1987), part of the

State v. Meeks

789 So. 2d 982, 2001 WL 776488

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 1696254

Cited 17 times | Published

OFFENDER FOR A SUBSTANTIVE VIOLATION UNDER SECTION 958.14, FLORIDA STATUTES, WHEN THE ACTS UPON WHICH

Lee v. State

67 So. 3d 1199, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13714, 2011 WL 3820124

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2011 | Docket: 2362512

Cited 14 times | Published

with credit for time served while incarcerated." § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2010). In this case, the trial court

Goldwire v. State

73 So. 3d 844, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17375, 2011 WL 5169982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2011 | Docket: 2536998

Cited 11 times | Published

Statutes governs youthful offenders. Specifically, section 958.14 discusses a youthful offender's violation of

State v. Arnette

604 So. 2d 482, 1992 WL 205559

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1992 | Docket: 1289623

Cited 11 times | Published

that this new sentence was not legal. In 1984, section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1983), read: "A violation

Watson v. State

528 So. 2d 101, 1988 WL 70559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1988 | Docket: 1717281

Cited 10 times | Published

Watson contended below that the provisions of § 958.14, Fla. Stat., as amended in 1985, were applicable

Dixon v. State

546 So. 2d 1194, 1989 WL 89734

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1989 | Docket: 1442341

Cited 9 times | Published

of the Youthful Offender Act because under section 958.14 of that act, his maximum sentence could be

Poore v. State

503 So. 2d 1282, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 450

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1987 | Docket: 1453615

Cited 9 times | Published

defendant was not given credit for time served. [7] § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1985). [8] § 958.05(2), Fla. Stat

Crosby v. State

487 So. 2d 416, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1986 | Docket: 1796934

Cited 9 times | Published

as a youthful offender. Further, nothing in section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1985) which was not in

Blacker v. State

49 So. 3d 785, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15807, 2010 WL 4103159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2010 | Docket: 60296852

Cited 8 times | Published

with credit for time served while incarcerated. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2003).3 Section 948.06(1), Florida

Rogers v. State

972 So. 2d 1017, 2008 WL 80211

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2008 | Docket: 1650609

Cited 8 times | Published

involving a third-degree felony. Pursuant to section 958.14, Florida Statutes (2000), a violator of youthful

Robinson v. State

702 So. 2d 1346, 1997 WL 761958

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1997 | Docket: 57118

Cited 8 times | Published

sentenced as a youthful offender. We affirm. Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1993) provides: [N]o youthful

Swilley v. State

781 So. 2d 458, 2001 WL 219930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2001 | Docket: 1690474

Cited 7 times | Published

as a youthful offender in accordance with section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1993). On November 1, 1997

Johnson v. State

678 So. 2d 934, 1996 WL 498495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1996 | Docket: 1736946

Cited 7 times | Published

court for appropriate resentencing pursuant to section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1993). Subsequent to the

Gardner v. State

656 So. 2d 933, 1995 WL 258911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1995 | Docket: 1283724

Cited 7 times | Published

revocation of community control or probation, section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1987), provides: A violation

Reeves v. State

605 So. 2d 562, 1992 WL 235301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1992 | Docket: 1343577

Cited 7 times | Published

question of whether the amended version of section 958.14, effective October 1, 1990 (see chapter 90-208

Christian v. State

84 So. 3d 437, 2012 WL 1121748, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2012 | Docket: 60306740

Cited 6 times | Published

nonsubstantive violation for a period longer than 6 years.” § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2004). Christian argues that his

Mims v. State

871 So. 2d 1003, 2004 WL 825613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2004 | Docket: 1300436

Cited 6 times | Published

Meeks was subject to resentencing pursuant to section 958.14, Florida Statutes, which is the general youthful

Hill v. State

486 So. 2d 1372, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 847

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1986 | Docket: 2585827

Cited 6 times | Published

1984, we do not address the amended version of Section 958.14, as amended by Chapter 85-288, Section 24,

Odegaard v. State

137 So. 3d 505, 2014 WL 1258535, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4637

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2014 | Docket: 60240338

Cited 5 times | Published

maximum sentence for the original offenses. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2008). However, he is entitled to

Yegge v. State

88 So. 3d 1058, 2012 WL 1959383, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2012 | Docket: 60308126

Cited 5 times | Published

youthful offender sentences no longer applies. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2007); State v. Meeks, 789 So.2d

Young v. State

988 So. 2d 1128, 2008 WL 2853149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2008 | Docket: 1722168

Cited 5 times | Published

offense for which he or she was found guilty." § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2002). At the time Mr. Young committed

Eason v. State

932 So. 2d 465, 2006 WL 1525878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2006 | Docket: 1684676

Cited 5 times | Published

the five-year sentence was not illegal under section 958.14, which the court ruled controlled appellant's

Hill v. State

692 So. 2d 277, 1997 WL 199360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1997 | Docket: 2522464

Cited 5 times | Published

sentence could not exceed six years.[1] However, section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1991), permits sentences

Dunbar v. State

664 So. 2d 1093, 1995 WL 722910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1995 | Docket: 1830084

Cited 5 times | Published

probation if the violation was substantive. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1993); Reeves v. State, 605 So.2d

State v. Hicks

545 So. 2d 952, 1989 WL 68937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1989 | Docket: 1703023

Cited 5 times | Published

entitled to be resentenced as a youthful offender. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1987). Dixon v. State, 546 So.2d

Miles v. State

536 So. 2d 262, 1988 WL 117587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1988 | Docket: 26700

Cited 5 times | Published

the six-year limitation period of the statute. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1987). On a second point we hold

Buckle v. State

528 So. 2d 1285, 1988 WL 77944

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1988 | Docket: 1717465

Cited 5 times | Published

does on appeal, that the court was limited by section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1987), to the imposition

Loveless v. Bryson

460 So. 2d 942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1984 | Docket: 1766125

Cited 5 times | Published

case and distinguishes our opinion in Lollis. Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1983) provides: A violation

Lollis v. State

449 So. 2d 430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1984 | Docket: 1325660

Cited 5 times | Published

control program." The court concluded that section 958.14, which subjects a youthful offender to probation

Lollis v. State

449 So. 2d 430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1984 | Docket: 1325660

Cited 5 times | Published

control program." The court concluded that section 958.14, which subjects a youthful offender to probation

St. Cyr v. State

106 So. 3d 487, 2013 WL 85446, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2013 | Docket: 60228217

Cited 4 times | Published

cap that applies to technical violations only. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2007). Appellant’s argument that

Hudson v. State

989 So. 2d 725, 2008 WL 3978700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2008 | Docket: 1665464

Cited 4 times | Published

seven-year sentence exceeds the six-year cap of section 958.14, Florida Statutes (2003), because he is a youthful

Thompson v. State

945 So. 2d 627, 2006 WL 3780629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2006 | Docket: 1725086

Cited 4 times | Published

youthful offender probation, as described in section 958.14, Florida Statutes, by making findings of fact

Shaw v. State

826 So. 2d 515, 2002 WL 31115175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2002 | Docket: 1197779

Cited 4 times | Published

negotiated plea to youthful offender sentences. Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1999), addresses the sanctions

Boffo v. State

543 So. 2d 435, 1989 WL 52156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1989 | Docket: 1729741

Cited 4 times | Published

to the intent of the Youthful Offender Act. Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1985), provides that upon

Reams v. State

528 So. 2d 558, 1988 WL 76448

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1988 | Docket: 1366648

Cited 4 times | Published

Appellant argues on appeal that the provisions of Section 958.14, Florida Statutes, as amended in 1985, were

Jacques v. State

95 So. 3d 419, 2012 WL 3316652, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2012 | Docket: 60311229

Cited 3 times | Published

or non-substantive violation of probation. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2012). The lower court denied the

Tidwell v. State

74 So. 3d 503, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14848, 2011 WL 4375010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2011 | Docket: 2576924

Cited 3 times | Published

exceed the statutory maximum for the crime. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2009). But when a youthful offender

Vantine v. State

66 So. 3d 350, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10508, 2011 WL 2624431

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2011 | Docket: 2362226

Cited 3 times | Published

than the maximum sentence for each offense. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2006).[1] The trial court properly

Henderson v. State

823 So. 2d 286, 2002 WL 1828086

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2002 | Docket: 456063

Cited 3 times | Published

See State v. Meeks, 789 So.2d 982 (Fla.2001). Section 958.14, Florida Statutes, provides that a youthful

Meeks v. State

754 So. 2d 101, 2000 WL 266310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2000 | Docket: 1523479

Cited 3 times | Published

that his sentence is illegal because under section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1991)[1], his violation

Escutary v. State

753 So. 2d 650, 2000 WL 256204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2000 | Docket: 1433215

Cited 3 times | Published

this Court recognized that "under amended section 958.14, a youthful offender can be sentenced in excess

Dimilta v. State

590 So. 2d 1074, 1991 WL 272650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1991 | Docket: 458096

Cited 3 times | Published

probation violation was excessive under the YOA. Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1989), provides as follows:

Hall v. State

536 So. 2d 268, 1988 WL 120873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1988 | Docket: 1504069

Cited 3 times | Published

the six-year limitation period of the statute," § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1987), we vacate appellant's sentence

Robin Eustache v. State of Florida

248 So. 3d 1097

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2018 | Docket: 7417582

Cited 2 times | Published

14 and 948.06, Florida Statutes (2005). In section 958.14, part of the Act, the Legislature provides

Shultz v. State

136 So. 3d 1232, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5506, 2014 WL 1468091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2014 | Docket: 60239943

Cited 2 times | Published

violations that were new substantive offenses. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1990), amended by ch. 90-208, § 19

Smith v. State

109 So. 3d 1180, 2013 WL 1165032, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2013 | Docket: 60229453

Cited 2 times | Published

maximum for the underlying offenses. Id. (citing § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2010)). Further, separate charges

Cutler v. State

927 So. 2d 249, 2006 WL 1196464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2006 | Docket: 1765217

Cited 2 times | Published

postconviction court did not agree. Citing section 958.14, it determined that because Cutler's probation

Bryant v. State

876 So. 2d 623, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2004 | Docket: 1245575

Cited 2 times | Published

sentenced in excess of the Youthful Offender Act. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1997). Because the record did not

White v. State

828 So. 2d 491, 2002 WL 31373686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2002 | Docket: 2563153

Cited 2 times | Published

incarceration, with credit for time served. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat.; State v. Watts, 558 So.2d 994, 998

Schneider v. State

788 So. 2d 1073, 2001 WL 557629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2001 | Docket: 1286469

Cited 2 times | Published

years in prison as a youthful offender under section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1989). The trial court agreed

Hernandez v. State

672 So. 2d 66, 1996 WL 179906

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1996 | Docket: 2581485

Cited 2 times | Published

the sentencing guidelines. We conclude that section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1991), which explains the

Darden v. State

641 So. 2d 431, 1994 WL 397609

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1994 | Docket: 2539163

Cited 2 times | Published

limitation placed on youthful offender sentences by section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1987). In denying Darden's

Warren v. State

542 So. 2d 429, 1989 WL 39597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1989 | Docket: 468944

Cited 2 times | Published

originally sentenced under the Youthful Offender Act, § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1987), appeals the final judgment

Hart v. State

463 So. 2d 491, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 372

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1985 | Docket: 1157039

Cited 2 times | Published

.. offender into community control." See also § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1983). This court recently held in

Moore v. State

463 So. 2d 406, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1985 | Docket: 448899

Cited 2 times | Published

We find that the more specific provisions of section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1983), govern over the more

Eustache v. State

199 So. 3d 484, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13209, 2016 WL 4540552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2016 | Docket: 60256611

Cited 1 times | Published

sections 948.06 and 958.14, Florida Statutes. Section 958.14 provides that “[a] violation ... of probation

West v. State

129 So. 3d 1155, 2014 WL 20609, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2014 | Docket: 60237309

Cited 1 times | Published

the trial court erred in its application of section 958.14, Florida Statutes (2013), we reverse and remand

Sanders-Bashui v. State

124 So. 3d 1041, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17656, 2013 WL 5928163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2013 | Docket: 60235292

Cited 1 times | Published

with credit for time served while incarcerated. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2011). It is clear that the trial

Flores v. State

46 So. 3d 102, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15024, 2010 WL 3893933

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2010 | Docket: 2397466

Cited 1 times | Published

6 years." § 958.14. "[A] `substantive violation,' as the phrase is used in section 958.14, refers exclusively

Drost v. State

995 So. 2d 1142, 2008 WL 5100604

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2008 | Docket: 865355

Cited 1 times | Published

Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2006) (permitting youthful offender

Martinez v. State

980 So. 2d 1245, 2008 WL 1960293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2008 | Docket: 1420114

Cited 1 times | Published

probation violated the six-year cap established by section 958.14. See Robinson v. State, 702 So.2d 1346, 1346-47

Bryant v. State

859 So. 2d 1269, 2003 WL 22797733

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 1296843

Cited 1 times | Published

violation of probation was substantive or technical. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1998); Swilley, 781 So.2d at 459

Windom v. State

835 So. 2d 1174, 2002 WL 31840846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2002 | Docket: 1643081

Cited 1 times | Published

this controversy depends on which version of section 958.14 should applythe version in effect at the time

Marquice Emanule Nolan v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2024 | Docket: 68209001

Published

incarcerated. 3 § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2017). As mentioned earlier

Cooper v. State

267 So. 3d 558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2019 | Docket: 64709241

Published

ORFINGER, COHEN, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. ("A violation or alleged violation

Cooper v. State

267 So. 3d 558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2019 | Docket: 64709242

Published

ORFINGER, COHEN, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. ("A violation or alleged violation

Ramirez v. State

245 So. 3d 883

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2018 | Docket: 64680201

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2010) (providing in part that "no youthful offender

Demetrius C. Cooper v. State

235 So. 3d 1034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2018 | Docket: 6262725

Published

2d 1182, 1186-87 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)). Section 958.14, Florida Statutes, addresses a youthful offender’s

2D15-19 / Davis v. State

210 So. 3d 101, 2016 WL 4648800, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 4422987

Published

six years as a youthful offender. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2010). The State unreservedly

Lashawna Randall v. State of Florida

182 So. 3d 854, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 224

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026045

Published

youthful offender restrictions. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2013). Nothing in the statute provides

Cruz v. State

198 So. 3d 648, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17040, 2015 WL 7074660

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2015 | Docket: 3012527

Published

counts was five years' in prison. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2013); State v. Milbry,

Danny Lee Flagg v. State of Florida

179 So. 3d 394

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2015 | Docket: 3011063

Published

Act is the six-year sentencing cap. Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (2007), provides: 3 We

Gianni Passino v. State of Florida

174 So. 3d 1055, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13080, 2015 WL 5131633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2015 | Docket: 2690047

Published

initially sentenced as a youthful offender. See § 958.14, Fla. .Stat. (2000) (limiting commitment of youthful

Yegge v. State

186 So. 3d 553, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5441, 2015 WL 1650293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2015 | Docket: 2649586

Published

control, he was resentenced in accordance with section 958.14, Florida Statutes (2002) (emphasis supplied)

Angel Guzman v. State

155 So. 3d 1209, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 182, 2015 WL 71677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2015 | Docket: 2621576

Published

“technical or nonsubstantive violation” as stated in section 958.14, Florida Statutes (2003). We have reviewed

Jackson v. State

147 So. 3d 1076, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14972, 2014 WL 4724567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2014 | Docket: 60243068

Published

on probation or into community control”); cf. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing that if a defendant

Viera v. State

138 So. 3d 550, 2014 WL 1722328, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2014 | Docket: 60240715

Published

on probation or into community control.”); cf. § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing that if a defendant

Lachenauer v. State

117 So. 3d 880, 2013 WL 3717291, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2013 | Docket: 60232833

Published

State, 972 So.2d 1017, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2009). Additionally, credit must

Williams v. State

110 So. 3d 39, 2013 WL 811480, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60230290

Published

maximum sentence allowable for the crime, see § 958.14, Florida Statutes (2007); Mistretta v. State,

Mistretta v. State

99 So. 3d 561, 2012 WL 3763559, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2012 | Docket: 60313096

Published

probation, even a substantive one as described in section 958.14, his status as a youthful offender cannot be

Eustache v. State

83 So. 3d 784, 2011 WL 5864756, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18669

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2011 | Docket: 60306500

Published

motion to correct illegal sentence. Pursuant to section 958.14, Florida Statutes, following appellant’s substantive

Plamondon v. State

58 So. 3d 370, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4872, 2011 WL 1327571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2011 | Docket: 60299335

Published

So.2d 101, 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)); see also § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2009) (“[N]o youthful offender shall

Snyder v. State

56 So. 3d 920, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3997, 2011 WL 1086765

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2011 | Docket: 60298708

Published

the statutory maximum for a charged offense. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2008). In this case, the sentence

Colbert v. State

15 So. 3d 898, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10735, 2009 WL 2382413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2009 | Docket: 1426488

Published

revocation of supervision limited to six years. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2004) (stating "no youthful offender

Schneider v. State

929 So. 2d 1121, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8679, 2006 WL 1652624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2006 | Docket: 64844803

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat.; Robinson v. State, 702 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)

Papinchak v. State

870 So. 2d 40, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13941, 2003 WL 22106675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2003 | Docket: 64829595

Published

violated the conditions of his supervision. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1999). However, his judgment and

Wallace v. State

851 So. 2d 232, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11056, 2003 WL 21697196

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2003 | Docket: 64824208

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1995); Young v. State, 697 So.2d 75 (Fla.1997); Johnson

Sanchez v. State

821 So. 2d 1181, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10321, 2002 WL 1625869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2002 | Docket: 64816544

Published

illegal sentence is affirmed on authority of section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1999); State v. Meeks, 789

Ross v. State

819 So. 2d 924, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8568, 2002 WL 1338042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2002 | Docket: 64816112

Published

penalty under the youthful offender statute. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1995); State v. Arnette, 604 So.2d

Quiles v. State

777 So. 2d 992, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13043, 2000 WL 1476580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2000 | Docket: 64803578

Published

sentenced Quiles to six years’ incarceration. Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1995), provides that “no

Willis v. State

744 So. 2d 1265, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15747, 1999 WL 1075121

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1999 | Docket: 64792266

Published

resentence him as a youthful offender. Under section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1997), a trial court may

Johnson v. State

736 So. 2d 708, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6844, 1999 WL 495596

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1999 | Docket: 64789211

Published

credit for time served while incarcerated. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1995). Without the credit for time

Wilkey v. State

712 So. 2d 847, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8490, 1998 WL 390835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1998 | Docket: 64781450

Published

pursuant to his probation violation is illegal. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1993). The record before the trial

Schebel v. State

721 So. 2d 1177, 1998 WL 60458

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1998 | Docket: 1323403

Published

the six-year statutory maximum set forth in section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1989), by sentencing him

Thompson v. State

693 So. 2d 138, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5156, 1997 WL 249148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1997 | Docket: 64773357

Published

was permissible under section 958.04(2)(d) or section 958.14, Florida Statutes. We affirm the revocation

Johnson v. State

661 So. 2d 974, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11687, 1995 WL 654490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1995 | Docket: 64759552

Published

court for appropriate resentencing as provided in § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1993), and State v. Amette, 604 So

Phillips v. State

630 So. 2d 590, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9221, 1993 WL 347565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1993 | Docket: 64745838

Published

offender on probation. If probation is revoked, section 958.14, Florida Statutes, provides that a youthful

Glasco v. State

567 So. 2d 565, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7791, 1990 WL 150209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1990 | Docket: 64653421

Published

We also call the trial court’s attention to section 958.14, Florida Statutes *566(1989) which limits the

Arnette v. State

566 So. 2d 1369, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7131, 1990 WL 134767

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1990 | Docket: 64653137

Published

and two years in a community control program. Section 958.14 of the Youthful Offender Act provided that

Williams v. State

559 So. 2d 725, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2623, 1990 WL 45261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1990 | Docket: 64649644

Published

in violation of the Youthful Offender Act. Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1985). We agree based upon

Hamilton v. State

553 So. 2d 387, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2862, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6972, 1989 WL 149580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1989 | Docket: 64646847

Published

1985 amendment to the youthful offender act, section 958.14, Florida Statutes? In Brooks v. State, 478

Hunnicutt v. State

549 So. 2d 1138, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2420, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5643, 1989 WL 118936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1989 | Docket: 64645380

Published

also held that the alternative provisions of section 958.14 (as amended in 1985) apply to sentences imposed

Kerklin v. State

548 So. 2d 689, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1639, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3794, 1989 WL 73757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1989 | Docket: 64644797

Published

sentence exceeds the six-year maximum provided by section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1985), we reverse the sentence

Haynes v. State

545 So. 2d 949, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1527, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3561, 1989 WL 68223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1989 | Docket: 64643440

Published

in excess of the six year maximum prescribed in § 958.14, Fla.Stat. There is sufficient competent evidence

Watts v. State

542 So. 2d 425, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1014, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2123, 1989 WL 37575

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1989 | Docket: 64642126

Published

probation or community control pursuant to section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1987) (part of the Youthful

Bradley v. State

462 So. 2d 24

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1985 | Docket: 1509993

Published

Commission to revoke or not revoke the release. But section 958.14, which is subsequent in location in the statutes