CopyCited 460 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2122, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24826
II. 5 ERISA § 3(1), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), defines "employee welfare benefit plan" or "welfare
0 red0 yellow111 green1 procedural
Cited as authorityArdoin (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBarnett (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGrosso (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 131 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 48 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1674, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28773, 2009 WL 5126236
benefit plans" governed by ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). Rutt and Egan participate in Anthem's network
0 red3 yellow143 green0 procedural
LimitedFilice (2025)phrase: "limited by"
LimitedGogan (2025)phrase: "limited by"
DistinguishedGriner (2011)phrase: "distinguishing"
CopyCited 139 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1033, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1161, 55 U.S.L.W. 2407
accident, disability, [or] death____ 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(1). Established by Parisian in order to provide
0 red1 yellow112 green2 procedural
CopyCited 143 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7367
“employee welfare benefit fund” under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), was self-funded by NRC, which paid the cost
0 red0 yellow76 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMasse (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityAbukasis (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 124 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2137, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5883, 59 U.S.L.W. 2664
Wright, Jr., President 4 . 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) provides: The terms "employee welfare
0 red0 yellow93 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGomez (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityFilice (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityTHOMPSON (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 90 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2122
benefit plans exist. II. ERISA § 3(1), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), defines “employee welfare benefit plan” or “welfare
0 red5 yellow328 green7 procedural
Cited "but see"Bush (2015)phrase: "but see"
DistinguishedGustafson (1993)phrase: "distinguishing"
CopyCited 108 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 WL 288123
benefits through an insurance policy. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1); see also Donovan v. Dillingham,
688 F.2d 13670 red0 yellow88 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGrosso (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authoritySILVERMAN (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 89 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2554, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26829, 1994 WL 486753
is covered by ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) (1988); Donovan v. Dillingham, 688
0 red0 yellow83 green34 procedural
CopyCited 79 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1729, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20848, 1996 WL 468471
death or unemployment.... Id. at § 1002(1). 6 . Senator Javits commented:
1 red4 yellow69 green23 procedural
OverruledCulpepper (1996)phrase: "overruling"
Cited "but see"Hobson (2003)phrase: "but see"
CopyCited 116 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1379, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8770
benefits through an insurance policy. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1); see also Donovan v. Dillingham, 688
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAttilus (2017)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLawrence (2016)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 61 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12545, 1990 WL 92677
Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). See Pilot Life v. Dedeaux, 481 U
0 red2 yellow43 green1 procedural
Cited "but see"Hulcher (1995)phrase: "but see"
Cited "but see"Sullivan (1994)phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityMcMahon (2016)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 53 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 56 U.S.L.W. 2279, 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2641, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12747
employee welfare benefit plan under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) which provides: The terms ‘employee welfare
0 red1 yellow39 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAtkins (2026)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHammer (2020)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 49 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1737, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3066, 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42, 079, 1993 WL 30299
benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) (“the Plan”). 2 The Plan provided
0 red0 yellow43 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMonte (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authoritySnyder (2014)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityCoriale (2011)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 49 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 17 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2433, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2199, 1994 WL 28531
event of sickness, [or] accident....” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1)(A). Both case law and Department of Labor
0 red2 yellow41 green21 procedural
DistinguishedLucas (2014)phrase: "distinguishing"
LimitedNielsen (1996)phrase: "limited in"
Cited as authorityKaspar (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 49 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
sickness, accident, disability or death. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1); Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux, 481
0 red0 yellow33 green34 procedural
Cited as authorityFilice (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityPosey (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLamb (2012)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 45 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
surgical, or hospital care or benefits...." 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), (3). The Funds argue that our prior ERISA decisions
0 red0 yellow32 green1 procedural
Cited as authorityGONITE (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 45 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 38 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2537, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23691, 2006 WL 2660931
benefits through an insurance policy. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1); see Donovan v. Dillingham, 688 F
0 red0 yellow27 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGogan (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 37 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 197, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13552, 1988 WL 93979
death or unemployment ... benefits...." 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1)(A). 3 . An exception to this rule
0 red0 yellow35 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJ.D.S. (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityScott (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMINCHEWS (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 160 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2001 WL 91380
welfare benefit plan within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) was established. In its contract with EHI, Software
3 red0 yellow118 green0 procedural
OverruledWolf (2021)phrase: "overruled in"
CopyCited 46 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
benefit plan" governed by ERISA, see 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1)(A), as well as a "group health plan," see id
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLadd (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityRoundtree (2015)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2037, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7508, 1993 WL 85729
Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). We hold that it does. Plaintiffs-appellants
0 red0 yellow27 green9 procedural
Cited as authorityCampbell (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityD'Elia (2016)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9790, 2002 WL 1040194
employee welfare benefit plan as defined in 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). It provides short and long term disability benefits
0 red0 yellow26 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityStewart (2021)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1520, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7070, 2003 WL 1870321
sickness, accident, [or] disability.” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). ERISA also broadly preempts state laws relating
0 red0 yellow23 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGomez (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMoore (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityFilice (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 27 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 669, 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2318, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 9360, 2004 WL 1067788
in the event of ... disability. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) (emphasis added). “By definition, then, a welfare
0 red0 yellow22 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAnastos (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityCampbell (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityAllen (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 26 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2688, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1358, 1999 WL 43228
accident, [or] disability. ... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). In Donovan v. Dillingham, 688 F.2d
0 red1 yellow22 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Cohen (2001)phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityAetna (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authoritySteigleman (2021)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 26 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32491, 1992 WL 348169
disability, death or unemployment.... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). 4 . The Supreme Court has demonstrated
0 red0 yellow19 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHammonds (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 WL 91638
plan is a welfare benefit plan under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) and not a pension plan under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(2)
1 red4 yellow85 green56 procedural
SupersededLeuthner (2003)phrase: "superseded by"
CopyCited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19174, 2006 WL 2105986
welfare benefit plan,” see 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), as well as a “group health plan,” see
0 red1 yellow63 green0 procedural
DistinguishedMattox (2008)phrase: "distinguishing"
CopyCited 53 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2814, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6505
services.... 27 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(1) (West Supp.1996) (emphasis added). In other
CopyCited 13 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17552, 1996 WL 670640
Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), (3), (5), (7), (8); Defendant's Exhibits ["DX"]
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityManning (2007)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLyncker (2006)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityRichards (2004)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 11 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7776, 2001 WL 220108
through the purchase of *1268 insurance. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). The preemption section states that this federal
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 9, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 4, 1995 WL 2421
employee benefit plan as defined in 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) and, therefore, should be regulated by ERISA
0 red0 yellow9 green1 procedural
CopyCited 12 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6187, 1993 WL 51541
sickness, accident, disability,.... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1)(A). In contrast, an employee pension plan provides
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGerzog (1995)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1994 WL 556079
Security Act of 1974 as amended (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). Both policies, standing alone, provide
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 38 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1829, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19161, 2006 WL 2097075
or maintained by an employer.” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) (emphasis added). Because a covered plan is defined
0 red1 yellow25 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBerry (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGogan (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 10 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15436, 1994 WL 594512
1370 (11th Cir.1982). ERISA § 3(1), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), defines an "employee welfare benefit plan" as:
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCramer (1995)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 9 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 462, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4993, 1995 WL 224811
disability, death or unemployment...." 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). Bill Currie Ford has not alleged that it did
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHansen (2000)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityZillyette (1998)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 695, 1997 WL 26760
benefits, including medical insurance. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). The Eleventh Circuit has analyzed the statutory
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAllen (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGooden (2016)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityStanley (2006)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7026, 1991 WL 87214
and "welfare plan," in turn, are defined in Section 1002(1) as: [A]ny plan, fund, or program which was
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBarringer (1995)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2530, 1988 WL 26152
Congress defined an employee welfare-benefit plan in § 1002(1) as one which provides to employees "medical,
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCrespo (1992)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHolcomb (1991)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityReid (1990)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 56 U.S.L.W. 2343
disability, death or unemployment.... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). . ERISA section 502(a)(1)(B), set forth in
0 red0 yellow31 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityRevells (2003)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGiannetti (2002)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityPalmore (2002)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1073
carrier, asserting jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(1) (West 1975). The district court held that SMET
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBrock (1987)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityCurry (1985)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 617, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1893, 2013 WL 4734579
age. Definitions. Give as applicable. Fla. Stat.
1002.01. “Private School” means a nonpublic school
0 red1 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCalafell (2017)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1073, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21622
carrier, asserting jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(1) (West 1975). The district court held that SMET
CopyCited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12875, 1998 WL 484387
did qualify as an ERISA plan. Cf. 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(1) (describing ERISA plans). [2] ERISA also preempts
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBacon (2010)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHooper (2001)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHardy (2000)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6882, 1996 WL 199825
Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), (3), (5), (7), (8); Pretrial Stipulation ["PTS"]
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityEpolito (2010)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLivick (2007)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18649, 1991 WL 183564
welfare plan" as that term is defined in 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). As such, this case is controlled in its entirety
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityFitts (1999)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23183, 2003 WL 22967253
employee welfare benefit plan under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) if it is a: (1) a'plan, fund or program' (2)
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAllen (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityD'Elia (2016)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7900, 1993 WL 191571
provided through the purchase of insurance. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). Moreover, it is a common practice for employers
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBertoni (2008)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWiesenberg (1995)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17362, 1991 WL 253132
or unemployment.... (Emphasis added). 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). There are ample factual allegations in the complaint
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLove (2000)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13152, 2002 WL 1802578
in section 186(c) of this title. ... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). In the seminal case of Donovan v. Dillingham
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityStern (2003)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10190, 1989 WL 99546
extraordinarily broad scope of this statute is seen in § 1002(1) which provides: The terms "employee welfare benefit
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityNechero (1992)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21008
the administration of such plan. [4] 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) defines an ERISA-covered plan as follows: any
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityKeys (2019)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authoritySalva (2001)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1912, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15204
their financial soundness. [7] Under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), an employee welfare benefit plan is one which
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityColeman (2010)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityCarlisle (1990)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
“employee welfare benefit fund” under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), was self-funded by NRC, which paid the cost
CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24637, 2001 WL 1867976
disability, death, or unemployment. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). This statutory framework has proven to be elusive
0 red1 yellow3 green0 procedural
DistinguishedRasmussen (2004)phrase: "distinguishing"
Cited as authorityPerez (2022)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityRasmussen (2004)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(1). An employee welfare benefit plan which “is subject
0 red1 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCIR (2012)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9295, 2017 WL 2781591
...ncsl.org/research/health/school-immunization-exemption-statelaws.aspx ("All 50 states have *1244 legislation requiring specified vaccines for students.”). . The statutory definition notes that a "private school may be a parochial, religious, denominational, for-profit, or nonprofit school.” § 1002.01(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 41 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1856, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20628
plan within the meaning of ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). The Plan document designates Coca-Cola as the
29 red2 yellow25 green0 procedural
VacatedTabakian (2021)phrase: "vacated in"
CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18911, 1994 WL 727955
disability, death or unemployment." 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). With limited exceptions not pertinent here,
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPerry (1997)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2661, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1162, 2000 WL 141221
disability, death or unemployment.... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). In Donovan v. Dillingham,
688 F.2d 1367 (11th
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityClegg (2002)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityThomas (2002)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8481
benefits in the event of sickness.... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). See Howard v. Parisian, Inc.,
807 F.2d 15600 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMalakoff (1991)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 WL 784782
plan” governed by ERISA, see 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1)(A), as well as a “group health plan,” see
0 red0 yellow23 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCollins (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21324
disability, death or unemployment.... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). The Eleventh Circuit has held that "a plan,
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Duncan (2005)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
plan within the meaning of ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). The Plan document designates Coca-Cola as the
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15224, 1993 WL 441387
an employee welfare-benefit plan in 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) as one which provides to employees "`medical
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityReed (1998)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5210, 1998 WL 181826
"employee welfare benefit plan" under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). An ERISA-qualified "employee welfare benefit
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySpikes (2020)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22142, 2005 WL 2462071
disability, death, or unemployment. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). The Eleventh Circuit has stated that to be an
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityStanley (2006)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1997 WL 131323
or prepaid legal services____ 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(1) (West Supp.1996) (emphasis added). In other words
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPickens (2017)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityPickens (2017)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityKarns (2012)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
welfare benefit plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) ("The terms 'employee welfare benefit plan’ and
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGriffin (2015)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGriffin (2015)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGriffin (2015)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
benefits in the event of sickness.” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) & (3) (emphasis added). On a de novo
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1985, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5205, 1992 WL 91417
Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. Section 1002(1) and that appellee had established that she
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida
employee welfare benefit plans. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). The five elements of an employee welfare benefit
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
in an ERISA welfare benefit plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) ("The terms `employee welfare benefit plan' and
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
death or unemployment,.... Id. at § 1002(1). 6 Senator Javits made the following
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
of preemption policy was necessary.6 Id. at § 1002(1). 6 Senator Javits made the following
CopyPublished | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18509, 1993 WL 409863
employee welfare benefit plan as defined in 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), and is subject to the reporting, disclosure
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11860, 2002 WL 1285156
employee welfare benefit plans. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). The five elements of an employee welfare benefit
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLeonard (2007)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
” and hence subject to ERISA, see 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(1) (West 1985), the ERISA "savings clause” expressly
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 561, 1994 WL 22553
constitutes an ERISA "plan." Under Title 29 U.S.C. Section 1002(1), ERISA defines an employee welfare benefit
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLemy (2012)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | District Court, M.D. Florida | 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1054, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4994, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43, 361, 1993 WL 118154
the meaning of Section 3(1) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1).” (Complaint, P. 2.) Additionally, the June 21
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySussman (1993)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 WL 129265
found in the definition provided by 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(1): (1) The terms “employee welfare benefit plan”
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 34 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1048, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13446, 2004 WL 2008467
2d 1367, 1370 (11th Cir. 1982). Under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), an employee welfare benefit plan is defined
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 WL 1587660
plan as defined under § 3(1) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). 4 The Plan originated in 1992 and
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
3 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1).4 The Plan originated in 1992 and provided for
CopyPublished | District Court, M.D. Florida | 38 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1787, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14834
funds, or prepaid legal services. . . . 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). The Eleventh Circuit has stated that an employee
CopyPublished | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8033
surgical, or hospital care or benefits.” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1, 3). Plaintiffs in ERISA actions must exhaust
CopyPublished | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal
arguing that Appellee "violated Chapter 10, Section 1002.1 of the Florida Building Code, by placing the
CopyPublished | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal
arguing that Appellee "violated Chapter 10, Section 1002.1 of the Florida Building Code, by placing the
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
benefits to participants and beneficiaries. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). Because the group health insurance policy issued
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
benefits to participants and beneficiaries. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). Because the group health insurance policy issued
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
accident, [or] disability.... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). In Donovan v. Dillingham,
688 F.2d 1367 (11th
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
accident, [or] disability . . . . 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). In Donovan v. Dillingham,
688 F.2d 1367 (11th
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
or hospital care or benefits . . . .” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), (3). The Funds argue that our prior ERISA
CopyPublished | District Court, M.D. Florida
ERISA employee welfare benefit plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1) ; Donovan v. Dillingham ,
688 F.2d 1367, 1371