Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The contract shall contain the names of the seller and the buyer, the place of business of the seller, and the residence or place of business of the buyer as specified by the buyer.
(Ga. L. 1967, p. 659, § 3; Ga. L. 1970, p. 98, § 1; Ga. L. 1981, p. 1797, § 1; Ga. L. 1998, p. 569, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 136, § 10.)
- Prohibition against suspension of gas or electrical service for failure to make payments on appliances purchased from or repaired by gas or electric utility company, § 16-12-3.
- Ga. L. 1998, p. 569, § 2, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that the 1998 amendment was applicable to all retail installment contracts entered into on or after July 1, 1998.
- Title I of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, referred to in subsection (d) of this Code section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.
Title V of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, referred to in subsection (d) of this Code section, appears as various sections throughout 15 U.S.C.
- For note discussing impact of federal truth-in-lending legislation on state law, see 12 Ga. L. Rev. 814 (1978).
- Once a retail installment contract is reduced to writing and signed, all the contract's provisions must be regarded as "essential provisions." Cook-Davis Furn. Co. v. Duskin, 134 Ga. App. 264, 214 S.E.2d 565 (1975).
- Since a contract contained a time price, payable in installments and the balance was declared due after a default by the vendee, the vendor was entitled to judgment for the full amount of the time price, not just the cash price plus interest on the judgment. Carter v. Whatley, 97 Ga. App. 10, 101 S.E.2d 899 (1958) (decided prior to enactment of this section).
- If a retail installment contract fails to state when insurance on purchased items would become effective, the contemplated effective date must be one which would afford protection at the time the risk of loss shifted to the buyer, which is the purpose of the insurance. Cook-Davis Furn. Co. v. Duskin, 134 Ga. App. 264, 214 S.E.2d 565 (1975).
- Violation of Ga. L. 1967, p. 659, § 3, in calculating the interest rebate does not constitute a willful violation of Ga. L. 1967, p. 659, § 1 et seq., and it is not a defense to the grant of a writ of possession in the goods in which a secured creditor holds the security interest. Fluellen v. Commercial Credit Corp., 151 Ga. App. 373, 259 S.E.2d 648 (1979).
Cited in Reese v. Termplan, Inc., 125 Ga. App. 473, 188 S.E.2d 177 (1972); Martin v. Glenn's Furn. Co., 126 Ga. App. 692, 191 S.E.2d 567 (1972); Brown v. Jenkins, 135 Ga. App. 694, 218 S.E.2d 690 (1975); Bell v. Loosier of Albany, Inc., 237 Ga. 585, 229 S.E.2d 374 (1976); Harrison v. Goodyear Serv. Stores, 137 Ga. App. 223, 223 S.E.2d 261 (1976); Bell v. Loosier of Albany, Inc., 140 Ga. App. 393, 231 S.E.2d 142 (1976); Thomas v. Universal Guardian Corp., 144 Ga. App. 869, 243 S.E.2d 101 (1978); Sumner v. Adel Banking Co., 244 Ga. 73, 259 S.E.2d 32 (1979); Vikowsky v. Savannah Appliance Serv. Corp., 179 Ga. App. 135, 345 S.E.2d 621 (1986).
- Law of sales and liability in respect thereof as applied to transactions in self-service stores, 163 A.L.R. 238.
Constitutionality, construction, and application of statute respecting sale, assignment, or transfer of retail installment contracts, 10 A.L.R.2d 447.
What is "compound interest" within meaning of statutes prohibiting the charging of such interest, 10 A.L.R.3d 421.
Reformation of usurious contract, 74 A.L.R.3d 1239.
Total Results: 5
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-02-20
Snippet: Constitution. Appellant further argues that OCGA § 17-10-1.3, which allows a trial court to consider whether
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-05-17
Snippet: pursuant to the standards set forth in OCGA § 15-1-10.1.” 3 OCGA § 15-1-10.1, which has not been amended
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-02-15
Citation: 388 S.E.2d 519, 259 Ga. 820
Snippet: Georgia Uniform Rules for the Superior Courts 10.1. 3. In his next enumeration of error appellant contends
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1974-02-25
Citation: 204 S.E.2d 740, 231 Ga. 821, 1974 Ga. LEXIS 1254
Snippet: Plaintiffs signature pursuant to Regulation 120-1-10-1.03 (4) of the Georgia Industrial Loan Commissioner
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1943-10-07
Citation: 196 Ga. 736
Snippet: sufficiently definite as against the demurrer. Grounds 9, 10, 1,3, and 14 of the special demurrer are directed to