O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410 (2019)

Definitions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this part, the term: (1) “Agreement” means any agreement relating to a business

opportunity or multilevel distribution company, including, but not limited to, the contract. (2)(A) “Business opportunity” means the sale or lease of, or offer to sell or lease, any products, equipment, supplies, or services for the purpose of enabling the purchaser to start a business and in which the seller or company represents: (i) That the seller or company will provide locations or assist the purchaser in finding locations for the use or operation of vending machines, racks, display cases or other similar devices, or currency operated amusement machines or devices. For purposes of this subparagraph, “assist the purchaser in finding locations” includes but is not limited to supplying the purchaser with names of locator companies, contracting with the purchaser to provide assistance or supply names, or collecting a fee on behalf of or for a locator company; (ii) That the seller or company will purchase any or all products made, produced, fabricated, grown, bred, or modified by the purchaser using, in whole or in part, the supplies, services, or chattels sold to the purchaser; or (iii) That the company, in conjunction with any agreement which requires a total initial payment of an amount exceeding $500.00, will provide a sales program or marketing program; provided, however, that this subparagraph shall not apply to the sale of a sales program or a marketing program made in conjunction with the licensing of a registered trademark or service mark. (B) The term “business opportunity” does not include: (i) The sale of an ongoing business when the owner of that business sells and intends to sell only that one business opportunity; (ii) Any relationship created solely by or involving: (I) The relationship between an employer and an employee or among general business partners; or (II) Membership in a bona fide cooperative association or transactions between bona fide cooperative associations and their members. As used in this subdivision, the term “cooperative association” means either (1) an association of producers of agricultural products organized pursuant to Article 3 of Chapter 10 of Title 2 or statutes similar thereto enacted by other states, or (2) an organization operated on a cooperative basis by and for independent retailers which

SELLING/OTHER TRADE PRACTICES

wholesales goods or furnishes services primarily to its member-retailers; (iii) Any agribusiness corporation; (iv) Any insurance agency; (v) Any offer or sale of a business opportunity where the seller has a net worth on a consolidated basis of not less than $15 million as determined on the basis of the seller’s most recent audited financial statement; and where the seller satisfies all of the following conditions or is a wholly owned subsidiary of a company that satisfies all of the following conditions: (I) Seller is a publicly traded company; (II) Seller has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and has timely filed all reports required under Sections 13 and 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for a period of 36 months; (III) Seller has not failed to pay any dividend or defaulted on any loan payment in the last five fiscal years; (IV) Seller has an annual trading volume of stock of 3,000,000 shares or more; and (V) Seller has an aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of $100 million or more; or (vi) A landlord, property manager, or owner who licenses or leases pushcarts or kiosks within or adjacent to a retail center containing divided retail floor space and common areas which will be used by any such licensee or lessee to sell goods or services not supplied by the landlord, property manager, or owner or any entity affiliated or associated with the landlord, property manager, or owner. For the purposes of this division, the term “pushcart” means a mobile retail unit from which goods or services are sold in the common area of a retail center, and the term “kiosk” means a temporary retail unit from which goods or services are sold in the common area of a retail center. (3) “Business opportunity seller or company” means any corporation, whether domestic or foreign, or any business, whether a partnership, limited partnership, sole proprietorship, joint venture, association, trust, unincorporated organization, or other entity, which shall solicit, advertise, offer, or contract for any business opportunity or cause to be solicited, advertised, offered, or contracted for any business opportunity in this state, or which has a principal place of

business in this state, even if solicitations are of nonresidents of Georgia. (4) “Company” means any multilevel distribution company or business opportunity company or seller. (5) “Initial payment” means the total amount which a purchaser or participant is obligated or agrees to pay under the terms of an agreement before or at the time of delivery of the goods or services to the purchaser or participant and which a purchaser or participant is obligated to pay within six months of the date that the purchaser or participant commences operation of the business. If the agreement states a total price and provides that the total price is to be paid partially as an initial cash payment and the remainder in specific monthly payments, the term means the total price. The term does not include any amount required by the seller to be deposited as security for the performance by a purchaser or participant of the operation of the business or that secures an extension of credit. If purchasers or participants may enter a multilevel distribution company or business opportunity at different levels, “initial payment” means the total sum the purchaser or participant is obligated to pay to enter at the level chosen by the purchaser or participant. (6) “Multilevel distribution company” means any person, firm, corporation, or other business entity which sells, distributes, or supplies for a valuable consideration goods or services through independent agents, contractors, or distributors at different levels wherein such participants may recruit other participants and wherein commissions, cross-commissions, bonuses, refunds, discounts, dividends, or other considerations in the program are or may be paid as a result of the sale of such goods or services or the recruitment, actions, or performances of additional participants. The term shall not include licensed insurance agents, insurance agencies, licensed real estate brokers, licensed real estate agents, licensed real estate agencies, licensed securities dealers, licensed limited securities dealers, licensed securities salesmen, or licensed limited securities salesmen. Any multilevel distribution company which operates in any of the forms precluded by paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (a) of Code Section 10-1-411 shall be considered an unlawful pyramid club under Code Section 16-12-38. (7) “Participant” means anyone who participates at any level in a multilevel distribution company. (8) “Person” means any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, trust, unincorporated organization, or other entity and shall include any other person that has a substantive interest in or effectively controls such person as well as the individual

SELLING/OTHER TRADE PRACTICES

officers, directors, general partners, trustees, or other individuals in control of the activities of such person. (9) “Purchaser” means any person who is solicited to become obligated, or does become obligated, under any agreement. (10) “Seller” means any multilevel distribution company or it means any person who offers to sell to individuals any business opportunity, either directly or through any agent.

History

Ga. L. 1980, p. 1233, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 522, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 149, § 10; Ga. L. 1986, p. 10, § 10; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1868, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 218, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2370, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 757, § 1.

Annotations

Code Commission notes. Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in

1988, “Code Section 16-12-38” was substituted for “Code Section 10-12-38” at the end of paragraph (6). Law reviews. For note, “The Georgia Sale of Business Opportunities Act,” see 1 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 219 (1985).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS “Seller” includes lessors to corporations. - Term “individual”, as used in paragraph (10) of O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410, may include artificial persons. Therefore, the fact that the lessee is a corporation would not preclude a finding that the lessor is a “seller” as defined in paragraph (10). Park Leasing Co. v. TWS, Inc., 206 Ga. App. 864, 426 S.E.2d 620, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1817 (1992), cert. denied, No. S93C0573, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 350 (Ga. Apr. 8, 1993). Defendant found to be “seller.” - Because the defendant headed a field installation and maintenance services division of a business engaged in designing, manufacturing, and marketing electronic components and equipment for the coin operated telephone market, defendant was personally a “seller” within the meaning of paragraph (10) of O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410 in that the defendant was an individual who had a substantive interest in a corporation which offered to sell a business opportunity. Hornsby v. Phillips, 190 Ga. App. 335, 378 S.E.2d 870, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 231 (1989). Officers of a limited liability company were “sellers” within the meaning of the Sale of Business Opportunities Act (SBOA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410(10), because the officers were individuals who had a

substantive interest in a multilevel distribution company or effectively controlled such company or the company’s activities; accordingly, pursuant to the Fair Business Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-399(a), and the SBOA, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-417(b), each officer was subject to personal liability for any violation of the SBOA which he or she had committed and which was proved by a physician. Amerireach.com, LLC v. Walker, 290 Ga. 261, 719 S.E.2d 489, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 948 (2011). Sale of franchise not a “business opportunity.” - Franchiser’s sale of a restaurant franchise to a franchisee did not meet the definition of a business opportunity under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410(2)(A)(iii) because the sales and marketing program associated with the franchise system were provided to the franchisee in conjunction with the licensing of registered trademarks and service marks; thus, the Georgia Sale of Business Opportunities Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410 et seq., did not apply to the sale. Am. Casual Dining, L.P. v. Moe’s Southwest Grill, L.L.C., 426 F. Supp. 2d 1356, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19422 (N.D. Ga. 2006). Statute of limitations. - General statute of limitations, providing that an action to enforce a right accruing to an individual under state statute must be

brought within 20 years after the action accrues, governs a cause of action arising solely under the Sale of Business Opportunities Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410 et seq., since the Act itself contains no statute of limitations. Hornsby v. Phillips, 190 Ga. App. 335, 378 S.E.2d 870, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 231 (1989). Contractual defenses are inapplicable when an action is based not on the contract but solely on an alleged violation of the Sale of Business Opportunities Act, O.C.G.A § 10-1-410 et seq. Hornsby v. Phillips, 190 Ga. App. 335, 378 S.E.2d 870, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 231 (1989). Agribusiness exemption. - Investment in cattle feeding and sales program was exempt under the agribusiness exemption in division (2)(B)(iii) of O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410. Seale v. Miller, 698 F. Supp. 883, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11837 (N.D. Ga. 1988). Claim sufficient against corporate officers. - Trial court erred in dismissing a physician’s complaint against a health and nutrition multi-level distribution company’s officers alleging violations of

the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq., and the Georgia Sale of Business Opportunities Act (SBOA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410 et seq., on the ground that the court lacked personal jurisdiction because in response to requests for admissions, the company admitted that the company was a “multilevel distribution company” as defined in the SBOA, that the provisions of the SBOA, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-415, applied to any agreement made in Georgia, that the officers were founding members of the company and were officers when the physician became a marketer; the officers also admitted that the physician’s cancellation rights under Georgia law were generally known to the officers, and the complaint was sufficient to state a claim against the officers. Walker v. Amerireach.com, 306 Ga. App. 658, 703 S.E.2d 100, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 1017 (2010), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 290 Ga. 261, 719 S.E.2d 489, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 948 (2011), vacated in part, 313 Ga. App. 584, 722 S.E.2d 201, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 28 (2012).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Practices forbidden by state deceptive trade practice and consumer protection acts - pyramid or ponzi or referral sales schemes, 48 A.L.R.6th 511.

Judicial remedies for proceeds and funds from Ponzi schemes, 100 A.L.R.6th 281.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1985–2018 · leading case: Hornsby v. Phillips, 378 S.E.2d 870 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989).
Hornsby v. Phillips, 378 S.E.2d 870 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 24× “The original complaint was brought against ApCon and Nation, and included claims for breach of warranty, breach of contract, and fraud. After the trial court granted Phillips' motion for partial summary judgment against ApCon, which is not in issue here, and discovery by…”
Amerireach.com, LLC v. Walker, 719 S.E.2d 489 (Ga. 2011). · cites it 8× “Appellants further contend that, even if the trial court had personal jurisdiction over the individual defendants, they could not be personally liable for violations of the SBOA, because none of them was a “seller” within the meaning of OCGA § 10-1-410 (10). Under that statute,…”
Am. Casual Dining, L.P. v. Moe's Sw. Grill, L.L.C., 426 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (N.D. Ga. 2006). · cites it 4× “Moe’s argues that the GSBOA does not apply in this case because the sale of a franchise does not constitute a “business opportunity.”
Moon v. CSA — Credit Solutions of Am., Inc., 696 S.E.2d 486 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “, by making certain material misrepresentations; because the plaintiff did not sue based upon a breach of the parties' contract, the defendants' contractual defenses were inapplicable, and the fact that the contract did not include the misrepresentations at issue was immaterial…”
Park Leasing Co. v. TWS, Inc., 426 S.E.2d 620 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 12× “OCGA § 10-1-410 (10) defines “seller” as “any person who offers to sell to individuals any business opportunity, either directly or through any agent.”
Walker v. Amerireach. Com, 703 S.E.2d 100 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “In its order, the trial court held that it had no personal jurisdiction over these defendants because no evidence existed that they were present in Georgia in their personal capacity, only as AmeriSciences officers.”
Raja v. Ohio Sec. Ins. Co., 305 F. Supp. 3d 1206 (D.N.M. 2018). “Liberty Mutual states that [a]llowing a party to file suit in anticipation of a breach of contract that may not even occur is a dangerous precedent that would promote the filing of any premature lawsuit, regardless of whether or not a cause of action has accrued.”
Smith v. Pay-Fone Sys., Inc., 627 F. Supp. 121 (N.D. Ga. 1985). “§ 10-1-410 et seq); and (7) breach of contract.”
Georgia Ex Rel. Adm'r of the Fair Bus. Practices Act v. Fam. Vending, Inc. (In Re Fam. Vending, Inc.), 171 B.R. 907 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1994). · cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 10-1-410, et seq. 3 . As the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.”
Seale v. Miller, 698 F. Supp. 883 (N.D. Ga. 1988). “Off’l Code § 10-1-410(2)(A). Georgia statutory law requires certain procedural fairness in the creation by a seller of a business opportunity for one entering a business.”
Touchton v. Amway Corp., 543 S.E.2d 782 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “Don and Sue Ellen Touchton (“appellants”) filed this action against Amway Corporation (“Amway”) and several individuals in the Amway distribution network, asserting claims of fraud, breach of contract, and violations of the Sale of Business Opportunities Act (“SBOA”), OCGA §…”
Banek Inc. v. Yogurt Ventures U.S.A., Inc., 6 F.3d 357 (6th Cir. 1993). “” Ga. Code Ann. § 10-1-410 (3) (Michie Supp.”
— 10-1-410(2)(A) — 1 case
Seale v. Miller, 698 F. Supp. 883 (N.D. Ga. 1988). “Off’l Code § 10-1-410(2)(A). Georgia statutory law requires certain procedural fairness in the creation by a seller of a business opportunity for one entering a business.”
— 10-1-410(2)(A)(iii) — 1 case
Am. Casual Dining, L.P. v. Moe's Sw. Grill, L.L.C., 426 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (N.D. Ga. 2006). “Moe’s argues that the GSBOA does not apply in this case because the sale of a franchise does not constitute a “business opportunity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.