O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 10-1-781 (2019)

Legislative intent

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly recognizes that a new motor vehicle is a major consumer purchase and that a defectively manufactured new motor vehicle is likely to create hardship for, or may cause injury to, the consumer. It is the intent of the General Assembly to create a procedure for expeditious resolution of complaints and disputes concerning nonconforming new motor vehicles, to provide a method for notifying consumers of their rights under this article, and to ensure that consumers receive information, documents, and service necessary to enable them to exercise their rights under this article. In enacting these comprehensive measures, the General Assembly intends to encourage manufacturers to take all steps necessary to correct nonconformities in new motor vehicles and to create the proper blend of private and public remedies necessary to enforce this article.

History

Code 1981, § 10-1-781, enacted by Ga.

L. 2008, p. 746, § 1/HB 470; Ga. L. 2015, p. 1088, § 8/SB 148.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2024 · leading case: Cory Bender v. Southtowne Motors of Newnan II, Inc., 793 S.E.2d 618 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).
Cory Bender v. Southtowne Motors of Newnan II, Inc., 793 S.E.2d 618 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 10-1-781. In addition to the statutory provisions enacted to effectuate these goals, OCGA § 10-1-795 authorizes the “Attorney Generalf 11 ] [to] promulgate rules and regulations and establish procedures necessary to carry into effect, implement, and enforce the provisions…”
Kl Prods., LLC v. Mercedes-benz U.s.a., LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “]” OCGA § 10-1-781. 2 See OCGA §§ 10-1-786 (b) (1); 10-1-789.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.