O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 10-1-830 (2019)

Definitions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this article, the term: (1) “Beauty pageant” means any contest or competition in which entrants are judged on the basis of physical beauty, skill, talent, poise, and personality and in which a winner or winners are selected as representing an ideal in one or more of these areas. “Beauty pageant” shall not include any such contest or competition in which no application fee or entrance charge is made for contestants, to which no admission charge is made for attendance, and in connection with which no tickets, chances, advertisements, or sponsorships are sold. (2) “Entrant’s fee” means any payment of money or other thing of value including, but not limited to, the selling of advertisements or tickets or the obtaining of sponsors, which activity is a precondition to participation in a beauty pageant. (3) “Operator” means any person, franchisee, firm or corporation, civil group, or elementary or secondary educational institution which promotes, organizes, or otherwise operates a beauty pageant, participation in which is limited to persons paying an entrant’s fee.

History

Code 1981, § 10-1-830, enacted by Ga.

L. 1992, p. 3256, § 1; Ga. L. 1994, p. 1165, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2004–2004 · leading case: Galardi v. Steele-Inman, 597 S.E.2d 571 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Galardi v. Steele-Inman, 597 S.E.2d 571 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “In her complaint, Steele raised claims based on slander, tortious interference with business relations, and violations of OCGA § 10-1-830 et seq. (“the beauty pageant statutes”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.