Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The General Assembly finds and declares as follows:
(Code 1981, §10-1-910, enacted by Ga. L. 2005, p. 851, § 1/SB 230.)
- For article on 2005 enactment of this article, see 22 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1 (2005). For article, "The Growing Threat of Identity Theft and Its Implications for Employers," see 11 Ga. St. B. J. 27 (No. 6, 2006). For note, "Cybersecurity on my Mind: Protecting Georgia Consumers from Data Breaches," see 51 Ga. L. Rev. 265 (2016).
- Dismissal of the plaintiff's cause of action against a state agency for disclosure of private information in violation of the Georgia Personal Identity Protection Act (GPIPA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-910 et seq., was affirmed for failure to state a claim because the GPIPA did not impose any standard of conduct in implementing and maintaining data security practices; thus, it could not serve as the source of a statutory duty to safeguard personal information. McConnell v. Department of Labor, 337 Ga. App. 457, 787 S.E.2d 794 (2016).
Identity Theft and Other Misuses of Credit and Debit Cards, 81 POF3d 113.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-05-20
Citation: 828 S.E.2d 352, 305 Ga. 812
Snippet: J.), and two statutes, OCGA §§ 10-1-393.8 and 10-1-910. In Bradley Center , the lead opinion, which only