Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer, or similar intermediary or intermediaries) after the date of enactment of this chapter shall do one of the following:
Each failure to make a quarterly or annual deposit required under this Code section shall constitute a separate violation.
(Code 1981, §10-13-3, enacted by Ga. L. 1999, p. 725, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 136, § 10; Ga. L. 2004, p. 340, § 1; Ga. L. 2016, p. 528, § 2/HB 899.)
The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, in the introductory language of subparagraph (2)(A), substituted "on a quarterly basis, no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter in which sales are made," for "by April 15 of the year following the year in question"; in division (2)(A)(i), substituted "$0.0094241" for "$.0094241"; in division (2)(A)(ii), substituted "$0.0104712" for "$.0104712"; in division (2)(A)(iii), substituted "$0.0136125" for "$.0136125"; in division (2)(A)(iv), substituted "$0.0167539" for "$.0167539"; in division (2)(A)(v), substituted "$0.0188482" for "$.0188482"; inserted a comma in division (2)(B)(ii); in the introductory language of subparagraph (2)(C), substituted "quarterly and annually" for "annually" in the first sentence, and inserted "calendar quarter or" near the end; added subparagraph (2)(D); and substituted "a quarterly or annual" for "an annual" in the ending undesignated paragraph of paragraph (2).
- Ga. L. 2004, p. 340, § 2, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "If this Act, or any portion of the amendment to division (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 10-13-3 made by this Act, is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, then such division (ii) shall be deemed to be repealed in its entirety. If subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 10-13-3 shall thereafter be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, then this Act shall be deemed repealed, and division (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 10-13-3 shall be restored as if no such amendments had been made. Neither any holding of unconstitutionality nor the repeal of division (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 10-13-3 shall affect, impair, or invalidate any other portion of Code Section 10-13-3, or the application of such Code section to any other person or circumstance, and such remaining portions of Code Section 10-13-3 shall at all times continue in force and effect." As of May, 2018, no ruling of unconstitutionality has been made.
Ga. L. 2004, p. 340, § 2, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "If this Act, or any portion of the amendment to division (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 10-13-3 made by this Act, is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, then such division (ii) shall be deemed to be repealed in its entirety. If subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 10-13-3 shall thereafter be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, then this Act shall be deemed repealed, and division (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 10-13-3 shall be restored as if no such amendments had been made. Neither any holding of unconstitutionality nor the repeal of division (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 10-13-3 shall affect, impair, or invalidate any other portion of Code Section 10-13-3, or the application of such Code section to any other person or circumstance, and such remaining portions of Code Section 10-13-3 shall at all times continue in force and effect." As of May, 2018, no ruling of unconstitutionality has been made. Refer to the bound volume for the text of this Code section.
Ga. L. 2004, p. 340, § 3, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to division (2)(B)(ii) shall govern all requests for the release of escrow moneys made on or after May 7, 2004.
Total Results: 6
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-04-19
Snippet: assistance of counsel claims); Reed v. State, 291 Ga. 10, 13 (3) (727 SE2d 112) (2012) (defining clear error)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-02-15
Snippet: (823 SE2d 336) (2019); Reed v. State, 291 Ga. 10, 13 (3) (727 SE2d 112) (2012). The State carried
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-10-02
Citation: 302 Ga. 156, 805 S.E.2d 868
Snippet: (II) (C) (1); see also Reed v. State, 291 Ga. 10, 13 (3) (727 SE2d 112) (2012) (similar transaction evidence;
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-01-19
Snippet: evidentiary support, see Reed v. State, 291 Ga. 10, 13 (3) (727 SE2d 112) (2012), we cannot say that the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-01-19
Citation: 298 Ga. 482, 781 S.E.2d 787, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 173
Snippet: support, see Reed v. State, 291 Ga. 10, 13 (3) (727 SE2d 112) (2012), we cannot say that the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-03-28
Citation: 294 Ga. 855, 757 S.E.2d 68, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 706, 2014 WL 1266139, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 244
Snippet: support. See Reed v. State, 291 Ga. 10, 13 (3) (727 SE2d 112) (2012). We also must yield to