Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Exhibit the instrument;
Give reasonable identification and, if presentment is made on behalf of another person, reasonable evidence of authority to do so; and
Sign a receipt on the instrument for any payment made or surrender the instrument if full payment is made.
Return the instrument for lack of a necessary indorsement; or
Refuse payment or acceptance for failure of the presentment to comply with the terms of the instrument, an agreement of the parties, or other applicable law or rule.
(Code 1981, §11-3-501, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 1306, § 3.)
- For note, "The Law of Evidence in the Uniform Commercial Code," see 1 Ga. L. Rev. 44 (1966). For comment on Studstill v. American Oil Co., 126 Ga. App. 722, 191 S.E.2d 538 (1972), see 24 Mercer L. Rev. 939 (1973).
- In light of the similarity of the issues dealt with by the provisions, decisions under former Code 1882, § 2781, former Code 1933, §§ 14-701 and 14-801, and former Code Sections 11-3-503, 11-3-504 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- According to rules of common law, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, the endorser of a promissory note is entitled to have the same duly presented for payment, and of a failure or refusal to pay the endorser is entitled to notice; and a failure of the holder to present for payment, or to give notice of nonpayment, discharges the endorser from liability. McCarroll v. First Inv. Co., 109 Ga. App. 748, 137 S.E.2d 319 (1964) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 14-701 and 14-801).
- It is necessary that each endorser be notified personally. Aldine Mfg. Co. v. Warner, 96 Ga. 370, 23 S.E. 404 (1895) (decided under former Code 1882, § 2781).
- The law does not require that notice of presentment and dishonor of a negotiable instrument be given to an endorser in order to charge the endorser with liability, where the endorser already has knowledge of such matters. The law does not require a useless thing. McCarroll v. First Inv. Co., 109 Ga. App. 748, 137 S.E.2d 319 (1964) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 14-701 and 14-801).
- To bind the endorser as such on notes endorsed after maturity, there had to be a presentment for payment and notice of dishonor upon nonpayment, and before endorsee could proceed against endorser on the instrument, petition must have set forth compliance with these prerequisites to liability. DeLoach v. Adams Loan & Inv. Co., 62 Ga. App. 61, 7 S.E.2d 580 (1940) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 14-701 and 14-801).
- Retention of check for unreasonable time without cashing and without indicating refusal to accept it as an accord and satisfaction constitutes acceptance. Studstill v. AMOCO, 126 Ga. App. 722, 191 S.E.2d 538 (1972), aff'd, 230 Ga. 305, 196 S.E.2d 847 (1973), later appeal, 132 Ga. App. 56, 207 S.E.2d 553 (1974) (decided under former Code Section11-3-503).
- If one intends to accept a check as payment of demand, it should be promptly presented for payment, usually within a 30-day period. Where, in absence of circumstances suggesting a contrary state of facts, the check, although not cashed, is kept for a period greatly in excess of this time, such retention may of itself cause the debtor to rely on theory that his offer (accord) has been accepted (satisfaction), in which case the creditor no longer has a right of action for any excess payment due. Studstill v. AMOCO, 126 Ga. App. 722, 191 S.E.2d 538 (1972), aff'd, 230 Ga. 305, 196 S.E.2d 847 (1973), later appeal, 132 Ga. App. 56, 207 S.E.2d 553 (1974) (decided under former Code Section11-3-503).
- Mere retention of stale check, with knowledge on part of debtor that creditor refused to accept it in full satisfaction of unliquidated liability, will not operate as an accord and satisfaction. Studstill v. AMOCO, 126 Ga. App. 722, 191 S.E.2d 538 (1972), aff'd, 230 Ga. 305, 196 S.E.2d 847 (1973), later appeal, 132 Ga. App. 56, 207 S.E.2d 553 (1974) (decided under former Code Section11-3-503).
- Only holder or holder's agent may properly present check for payment. Thus, the Uniform Commercial Code reaffirms general pre-Code rule that drawee may not charge its drawer customer's accounts for payment of order instrument bearing a forged endorsement. Perini Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank, 553 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1977) (decided under former Code Section 11-3-504).
- Neither T. 7 nor T. 11 restricts in any way a bank's freedom to decide how it will treat any particular collection item, whether it be a check or a credit union share draft. 1977 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 77-2 (rendered under former Code Section 11-3-504).
- Law of this state does not require banks to process credit union share drafts as cash items, rather than as drafts for collection. 1977 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 77-2 (rendered under former Code Section 11-3-504).
- 11 Am. Jur. 2d, Bills and Notes, §§ 105, 125, 313 et seq., 375, et seq.
- 10 C.J.S., Bills and Notes, § 202 et seq.
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 3-501.
- To whom should notice of protest or of dishonor of commercial paper be given in event of death of the party entitled thereto, 1 A.L.R. 474.
Conduct of holder of check at time of presentation for payment as affecting drawer's liability, 4 A.L.R. 1233.
Right of owner of check which the drawee bank held for him at time it closed its doors, to a preference, 17 A.L.R. 196.
Insolvency or bankruptcy of party primarily liable on commercial paper as excusing demand and notice of dishonor, 25 A.L.R. 962; 87 A.L.R. 1394.
Necessity of protest and notice as between coindorsers of negotiable paper, 32 A.L.R. 190.
Bills and notes: necessity of possession and exhibition of paper at time of demand in order to make a valid presentment, 50 A.L.R. 1200.
Validity and effect of promise made after filing of petition in bankruptcy, but before discharge, to pay existing debt, 83 A.L.R. 1295.
No results found for Georgia Code 11-3-501.