O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 11-8-105 (2019)

Notice of adverse claim

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A person has notice of an adverse claim if:

(1) The person knows of the adverse claim;

(2) The person is aware of facts sufficient to indicate that there is a significant probability that the adverse claim exists and deliberately avoids information that would establish the existence of the adverse claim; or

(3) The person has a duty, imposed by statute or regulation, to investigate whether an adverse claim exists, and the investigation so required would establish the existence of the adverse claim.

(b) Having knowledge that a financial asset or interest therein is or has been transferred by a representative imposes no duty of inquiry into the rightfulness of a transaction and is not notice of an adverse claim. However, a person who knows that a representative has transferred a financial asset or interest therein in a transaction that is, or whose proceeds are being used, for the individual benefit of the representative or otherwise in breach of duty has notice of an adverse claim.

(c) An act or event that creates a right to immediate performance of the principal obligation represented by a security certificate or sets a date on or after which the certificate is to be presented or surrendered for redemption or exchange does not itself constitute notice of an adverse claim except in the case of a transfer more than:

(1) One year after a date set for presentment or surrender for redemption or exchange; or

(2) Six months after a date set for payment of money against presentation or surrender of the certificate, if money was available for payment on that date.

(d) A purchaser of a certificated security has notice of an adverse claim if the security certificate:

(1) Whether in bearer or registered form, has been indorsed “for collection” or “for surrender” or for some other purpose not involving transfer; or

(2) Is in bearer form and has on it an unambiguous statement that it is the property of a person other than the transferor, but the mere writing of a name on the certificate is not such a statement.

(e) Filing of a financing statement under Article 9 of this title is not notice of an adverse claim to a financial asset.

History

Code 1981, § 11-8-105, enacted by Ga. L. 1998, p. 1323, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933,§ 109A-8304 are included in the annotations for this Code section. Endorsements “for collection” and “for surrender.” - Examples given in former subsection (1)(a) of this section,

(for collection, for surrender), of endorsements not involving transfer are in fact endorsements excluding idea of transfer by sale. Harris, Upham & Co. v. Harris, 142 Ga. App. 696, 236 S.E.2d 773, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1716 (1977) (decided under former Code 1933, § 109A-8-304).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 15A Am. Jur. 2d, Commercial Code, § 98 et seq. C.J.S. 19 C.J.S., Corporations, § 670. 64A C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, § 1716 et seq. 81A C.J.S., States, § 190. U.L.A. Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 8105.

ALR. Conflict of laws as to title and transfer of corporate stock, 131 A.L.R. 192. Right or duty of corporation to refuse to transfer stock on books to one presenting properly endorsed certificate, because of knowledge or suspicion of conflicting rights of registered holder or of third person, 139 A.L.R. 273; 75 A.L.R.2d 746.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Amegy Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Deutsche Bank Alex.Brown, 619 F. App'x 923 (11th Cir. 2015).
Amegy Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Deutsche Bank Alex.Brown, 619 F. App'x 923 (11th Cir. 2015). · cites it 5× “O.C.G.A. § 11-8-105 cmt. 4 (noting that, by providing “that a person has notice of an adverse claim if the person is aware of a significant probability that an adverse claim exists and deliberately avoids information that might establish the existence of the adverse claim,” §…”
— 11-8-105(a)(2) — 1 case
Amegy Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Deutsche Bank Alex.Brown, 619 F. App'x 923 (11th Cir. 2015). “O.C.G.A. § 11-8-105 cmt. 4 (noting that, by providing “that a person has notice of an adverse claim if the person is aware of a significant probability that an adverse claim exists and deliberately avoids information that might establish the existence of the adverse claim,” §…”
— 11-8-105(e) — 1 case
Amegy Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Deutsche Bank Alex.Brown, 619 F. App'x 923 (11th Cir. 2015). “O.C.G.A. § 11-8-105 cmt. 4 (noting that, by providing “that a person has notice of an adverse claim if the person is aware of a significant probability that an adverse claim exists and deliberately avoids information that might establish the existence of the adverse claim,” §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.