Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §11-9-313, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 362, § 1; Ga. L. 2010, p. 481, § 2-26/HB 451.)
The 2010 amendment, effective May 27, 2010, inserted "tangible" in the middle of the first sentence of subsection (a). See the Editor's notes for applicability.
- Ga. L. 2010, p. 481, § 3-1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act applies to a document of title that is issued or a bailment that arises on or after the effective date of this Act. This Act does not apply to a document of title that is issued or a bailment that arises before the effective date of this Act even if the document of title or bailment would be subject to this Act if the document of title had been issued or bailment had arisen on or after the effective date of this Act. This Act does not apply to a right of action that has accrued before the effective date of this Act." This Act became effective May 27, 2010.
Ga. L. 2010, p. 481, § 3-2, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "A document of title issued or a bailment that arises before the effective date of this Act and the rights, documents, and interests flowing from that document or bailment are governed by any statute or other rule amended or repealed by this Act as if such amendment or repeal had not occurred and may be terminated, completed, consummated, or enforced under that statute or other rule." This Act became effective May 27, 2010.
- For note, "Limits on Residential Mortgage Lender Protection Section 1322(b) of the Bankruptcy Code," see 9 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 647 (1993).
- In the light of the similarity of the provisions, decisions under former Article 9 are included in the annotations for this Code section. For a table of comparable provisions, see the table at the beginning of the Article.
- This section deals with perfection of security interests so as to protect and give priority to secured creditors over claims of third parties in personal property taken as security; it does not govern creation of property rights or security interests. McCrackin v. Hayes, 118 Ga. App. 267, 163 S.E.2d 246 (1968) (decided under former Code Section11-9-305).
- Security interest in money (either originally given or received as proceeds from negotiation of instrument) is perfected by possession. In re Atlanta Times, Inc., 259 F. Supp. 820 (N.D. Ga. 1966), aff'd sub nom. Sanders v. National Acceptance Co. of Am., 383 F.2d 606 (5th Cir. 1967) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-305).
- Creditor's security interest in escrow account perfected by possession. Dent v. Associates Equity Servs. Co., 130 Bankr. 623 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1991) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-305).
- This provision does not nullify rule that "transfer of instrument vests in transferee such rights as transferor has." McCrackin v. Hayes, 118 Ga. App. 267, 163 S.E.2d 246 (1968) (decided under former Code Section11-9-305).
- Creditor perfected its security interest in a diamond ring by taking possession of it. First Am. Bank & Trust Co. v. Harris (In re Stewart), 74 Bankr. 350 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1987) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-305).
- Computer information and programming recorded on magnetic tape were "general intangibles" which are not included in the types of collateral in which security interests can be perfected by possession under former § 11-9-305 (see now § 11-9-313), and a security interest therein could therefore only be perfected by filing a financing statement. Dabney v. Information Exch., Inc., 98 Bankr. 603 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1989) (decided under former Code Section11-9-305).
- 68A Am. Jur. 2d, Secured Transactions, §§ 16, 49, 55, 109, 288 et seq., 444-479.
- 6A C.J.S., Assignments, §§ 79, 80, 85. 72 C.J.S., Pledges, § 22.
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 9-313.
- Rights of holders of different notes in respect of collateral securing them, 52 A.L.R. 1391.
Perfection of security interests by possession, delivery, or control under revised Article 9 of Uniform Commercial Code, 53 A.L.R.6th 159.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1992-07-16
Citation: 418 S.E.2d 601, 262 Ga. 364, 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 643, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 1414, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 586
Snippet: encumbrance within the meaning of Code Section 11-9-313, which conflicting security interest was perfected