O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 11-9-613 (2019)

Contents and form of notification before disposition of collateral; general

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except in a consumer goods transaction, the following rules apply: (1) The contents of a notification of disposition are sufficient if the notification: (A) Describes the debtor and the secured party; (B) Describes the collateral that is the subject of the intended disposition; (C) States the method of intended disposition; (D) States that the debtor is entitled to an accounting of the unpaid indebtedness and states the charge, if any, for an accounting; and (E) States the time and place of a public disposition or the time after which any other disposition is to be made; (2) Whether the contents of a notification that lacks any of the information specified in paragraph (1) of this Code section are nevertheless sufficient is a question of fact; (3) The contents of a notification providing substantially the information specified in paragraph (1) of this Code section are sufficient, even if the notification includes: (A) Information not specified by that paragraph; or (B) Minor errors that are not seriously misleading; (4) A particular phrasing of the notification is not required; and (5) The following form of notification and the form appearing in paragraph (3) of Code Section 11-9-614, when completed, each provides sufficient information: NOTIFICATION OF DISPOSITION OF COLLATERAL To: (Name of debtor, obligor, or other person to which the notification is sent) From: (Name, address, and telephone number of secured party) Name of Debtor(s): (Include only if debtor(s) is (are) not an addressee) (For a public disposition:)

We will sell (or lease or license, as applicable) the (describe collateral) to the highest qualified bidder in public as follows: Day and date: Time: Place: (For a private disposition:) We will sell (or lease or license, as applicable) the (describe collateral) privately sometime after (day and date). You are entitled to an accounting of the unpaid indebtedness secured by the property that we intend to sell (or lease or license, as applicable) (for a charge of $ ). You may request an accounting by calling us at (telephone number).

History

Code 1981, § 11-9-613, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 362, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Valid private sale. - Assuming that the sale of collateral was a public sale within the meaning of O.C.G.A. § 11-1201(31.1), the sale occurred in a commercially reasonable manner under O.C.G.A. § 11-9-627, because the sale was consistent with the reasonable commercial practices of dealers in similar equipment. Moreover, the sale qualified as a valid private sale under O.C.G.A. § 11-9-613 and the creditor did not have to comply with the statute’s public-sale provisions

regarding time and advertising. Colonial Pac. Leasing Corp. v. N & N Partners, LLC, 981 F. Supp. 2d 1345, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157378 (N.D. Ga. 2013). Misstatement in a notification of sale. - Misstatement in the notifications of sale - that the secured creditor’s subsidiary was the secured creditor - was a minor error that was not seriously misleading. Colonial Pac. Leasing Corp. v. N & N Partners, LLC, 981 F. Supp. 2d 1345, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157378 (N.D. Ga. 2013).

RESEARCH REFERENCES U.L.A. Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 9613.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2014 · leading case: Colonial Pac. Leasing Corp. v. N & N Partners, LLC, 981 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (N.D. Ga. 2013).
Colonial Pac. Leasing Corp. v. N & N Partners, LLC, 981 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (N.D. Ga. 2013). · cites it 4× “Defendants suggest that this error was serious: receiving the notifications from Colonial “serve[d] nothing more than to create the very confusion that the UCC is designed to avoid” and “eviscerated” their statutory right of redemption. [28 at 6]. These arguments, however, have…”
John Deere Constr. & Forestry Co. v. Parham, 755 S.E.2d 825 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Deere subsequently filed this deficiency action, seeking the remaining balance due under the terms of the Loan.”
— 11-9-613(1)(C) — 1 case
Colonial Pac. Leasing Corp. v. N & N Partners, LLC, 981 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (N.D. Ga. 2013). “Defendants suggest that this error was serious: receiving the notifications from Colonial “serve[d] nothing more than to create the very confusion that the UCC is designed to avoid” and “eviscerated” their statutory right of redemption. [28 at 6]. These arguments, however, have…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.