Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448This partshall be known as and may be cited as the "Georgia Hazardous Waste Management Act."
(Ga. L. 1979, p. 1127, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2234, § 5.)
- O.C.G.A. § 50-13-10 did not authorize plaintiffs to obtain declaratory judgment as to validity of rules enacted pursuant to the Hazardous Waste Management Act, O.C.G.A. § 12-8-60 et seq., when the plaintiffs were contending that the Act and rules promulgated thereunder were unconstitutional. George v. Department of Natural Resources, 250 Ga. 491, 299 S.E.2d 556 (1983).
Cited in Earth Mgt., Inc. v. Heard County, 248 Ga. 442, 283 S.E.2d 455 (1981); South Carolina Ins. Co. v. Coody, 813 F. Supp. 1570 (M.D. Ga. 1993); Georgia Ports Auth. v. Diamond Mfg. Co., 164 Bankr. 189 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1994).
- Right to maintain action based on violation of § 7003 of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 USCS § 6973) pertaining to imminent hazards from solid or hazardous waste, 105 A.L.R. Fed. 800.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1989-02-15
Citation: 375 S.E.2d 856, 258 Ga. 873, 29 ERC (BNA) 1703, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 77
Snippet: Georgia Hazardous Waste Management Act, OCGA § 12-8-60 et seq. (the Act), and the rules promulgated pursuant
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1983-01-25
Citation: 299 S.E.2d 566, 250 Ga. 491, 19 ERC (BNA) 1703, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 555
Snippet: Georgia Hazardous Waste Management Act, OCGA § 12-8-60 et seq. (Code Ann. § 43-2901 et seq.), and the