O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 12-8-61 (2019)
Legislative policy
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
It is declared to be the public policy of the State of Georgia, in furtherance of its responsibility to protect the public health, safety, and well-being of its citizens and to protect and enhance the quality of its environment, to institute and maintain a comprehensive state-wide program for the management of hazardous wastes through the regulation of the generation, transportation, storage, treatment, and disposal of hazardous wastes.
History
Ga. L. 1979, p. 1127, § 2; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2234, § 5.
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 2 Am. Jur. 2d, Administrative Law, § 48. 25 Am. Jur. 2d, Drains and Drainage Districts, § 3. 61C
Am. Jur. 2d, Pollution Control, §§ 975 et seq., 1052 et seq. C.J.S. - 28 C.J.S., Drains, § 3 et seq.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1989–1998 · leading case: Georgia Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Union Timber Corp., 375 S.E.2d 856 (Ga. 1989).
Georgia Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Union Timber Corp., 375 S.E.2d 856 (Ga. 1989). “reflects the risks involved, which in turn emphasizes the need for the insurance.” Thus, Union is subject to no more responsibility than it should rightly bear, as determined by the risk and the insurance market.”
S. States Landfill, Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Nat. Resources, 801 F. Supp. 725 (M.D. Ga. 1992). “Part 261. The state of Georgia also designates additional materials as "hazardous waste.”
Reheis v. AZS CORP., 503 S.E.2d 36 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). “2 OCGA § 12-8-61. 3 Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, p.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.