Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 13-8-2.1 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 13 CONTRACTS

Section 8. Illegal and Void Contracts Generally, 13-8-1 through 13-8-59.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

13-8-2.1. Contracts in partial restraint of trade.

Repealed by Ga. L. 2011, p. 399, § 3/HB 30, effective May 11, 2011.

Editor's notes.

- This Code section was based on Code 1981, § 13-8-2.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 1676, § 2; Ga. L. 1991, p. 94, § 13; Ga. L. 2009, p. 231, § 2/HB 173.

Ga. L. 2011, p. 399, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "During the 2009 legislative session the General Assembly enacted HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231), which was a bill that dealt with the issue of restrictive covenants in contracts and which was contingently effective on the passage of a constitutional amendment. During the 2010 legislative session the General Assembly enacted HR 178 (Ga. L. 2010, p. 1260), the constitutional amendment necessary for the statutory language of HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231), and the voters ratified the constitutional amendment on November 2, 2010. It has been suggested by certain parties that because of the effective date provisions of HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231), there may be some question about the validity of that legislation. It is the intention of this Act to remove any such uncertainty by substantially reenacting the substantive provisions of HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231), but the enactment of this Act should not be taken as evidence of a legislative determination that HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231) was in fact invalid."

Ga. L. 2011, p. 399, § 5, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that the repeal of this Code section shall apply to contracts entered into on and after May 11, 2011, and shall not apply in actions determining the enforceability of restrictive covenants entered into before May 11, 2011.

Law reviews.

- For note, "Balancing the Scales: Reforming Georgia's Common Law in Evaluating Restrictive Covenants Ancillary to Employment Contracts," 46 Ga. L. Rev. 1117 (2012).

Cases Citing Georgia Code 13-8-2.1 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 5

MOTORSPORTS OF CONYERS, LLC v. BURBACH

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-09-06

Snippet: trade, business, or employment.” Former OCGA § 13-8-2.1 (a), enacted at Ga. L. 1990, pp. 1676-1677, §

Atlanta Bread Co. International v. Lupton-Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-06-29

Citation: 679 S.E.2d 722, 285 Ga. 587, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2194, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 400

Snippet: Court considered the constitutionality of OCGA § 13-8-2.1 as it related to a restrictive covenant in an

Rooney v. Jackson & Coker, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-09-05

Citation: 261 Ga. 533, 409 S.E.2d 522, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1472, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 370

Snippet: filed an action for injunctive relief under OCGA § 13-8-2.1 (the Act) seeking enforcement of post-employment

Jackson & Coker, Inc. v. Hart

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-06-27

Citation: 405 S.E.2d 253, 261 Ga. 371, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1000, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 315

Snippet: employment contracts are unenforceable and that OCGA § 13-8-2.1 (the Act) is unconstitutional insofar as it relates

Hamrick v. Kelley

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-06-21

Citation: 392 S.E.2d 518, 260 Ga. 307

Snippet: Ga. L. 1990, p. ._et seq., codified as OCGA § 13-8-2.1, effective July 1, 1990.