Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §14-2-1331, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1070, § 1.)
Source: Model Act, § 13.31. This replaces former § 14-2-251(g)(7).
Subsection (a) provides that generally the costs of the appraisal proceeding should be assessed against the corporation. But the court is authorized to assess these costs, in whole or in part, against the dissenters if it concludes they acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith in making the Section14-2-1327 demand for additional payment. Attorneys' fees and the costs of experts employed by the parties have been excluded from these assessments. This preserves the approach of former law, § 14-2-251(g)(7).
Similarly, subsection (b) provides that counsel fees and fees of experts may be charged against the corporation or against dissenters upon a finding of a failure to comply in good faith with the requirements of this article. Further, subsection (b)(1) permits the court to assess these fees against a corporation that has substantially failed to comply with this article, without a finding that the corporation has acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith. While this approach is similar to that of former law, § 14-2-251(g)(7) contained specific criteria for assessing these expenses. Under Section14-2-1330(a) if the corporation fails to begin the proceeding, it is liable for the amount demanded by each dissenter whose claim remains unsettled, in addition to assessments made under this section.
Under subsection (c), individual dissenters, in turn, can be called upon to pay counsel fees for other dissenters if the court finds that the services were of substantial benefit to the other dissenters.
The purpose of all these grants of discretion with respect to costs and counsel fees is to increase the incentives of both sides to proceed in good faith under this article to attempt to resolve their disagreement without the need of a formal judicial appraisal of the value of shares.
Cross-References Appraisers, see § 14-2-1330. "Dissenter" defined, see § 14-2-1301. "Proceeding" defined, see § 14-2-140.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code Section 14-2-251, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Federal district court's determination that a dissenting shareholder's refusal to accept a stock tender offer was "arbitrary, vexatious, or otherwise not in good faith" did not violate the shareholder's Seventh Amendment right to have a jury decide whether the dissenter had acted arbitrarily. Columbus Mills, Inc. v. Freeland, 918 F.2d 1575 (11th Cir. 1990) (decided under former § 14-2-251).
- Because the action was not brought under O.C.G.A. §§ 14-2-1330 and14-2-1331 were not applicable and the court erred in awarding attorney fees, attorney expenses, expert witness fees and expenses to the dissenter. VSI Enters., Inc. v. Edwards, 238 Ga. App. 369, 518 S.E.2d 765 (1999).
- Attorneys' fees and other expenses incident to controversy respecting internal affairs of corporation as charge against the corporation, 39 A.L.R.2d 580.
No results found for Georgia Code 14-2-1331.