O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-3-856 (2019)

Indemnification of officers, employees, and agents

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A corporation may indemnify and advance expenses under this part to an officer of the corporation who is a party to a proceeding because he or she is an officer of the corporation: (1) To the same extent as a director; and

(2) If he or she is not a director, to such further extent as may be provided by the articles of incorporation, the bylaws, a resolution of the board of directors, or contract except for liability arising out of conduct that constitutes:

(A) Appropriation, in violation of his or her duties, of any business opportunity of the corporation;

(B) Acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

(C) The types of liability set forth in Code Section 14-3-831; or

(D) Receipt of an improper personal benefit.

(b) The provisions of paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of this Code section shall apply to an officer who is also a director if the sole basis on which he or she is made a party to the proceeding is an act or omission solely as an officer.

(c) An officer of a corporation who is not a director is entitled to mandatory indemnification under Code Section 14-3-852, and may apply to a court under Code Section 14-3-854 for indemnification or advances for expenses, in each case to the same extent to which a director may be entitled to indemnification or advances for expenses under those provisions.

(d) A corporation may also indemnify and advance expenses to an employee or agent who is not a director to the extent, consistent with public policy, that may be provided by its articles of incorporation, bylaws, general or specific action of its board of directors, or contract.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-3-856, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 465, § 1; Ga. L. 1994, p. 97, § 14; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1165, § 14; Ga. L. 2004, p. 508, § 44.)

Annotations

COMMENT The Business Code counterpart to this section is section 14-2-857. Note to 1997 Amendment Amendments were made to conform the definitions to changes made in the Business Corporation Code in 1996. Comments to the 1996 amendments to the comparable provisions of the Business Corporation Code are applicable to these provisions.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: In re Nat'l Heritage Found., Inc., 478 B.R. 216 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012).
In re Nat'l Heritage Found., Inc., 478 B.R. 216 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012). · cites it 2× “” Ga. Code § 14-3-856(a)(2)(B). Of course, the corporation cannot know, when presented with a demand for indemnity, whether its directors’ or officers’ conduct comports with the above statutory standards.”
— 14-3-856(a)(2)(B) — 1 case
In re Nat'l Heritage Found., Inc., 478 B.R. 216 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012). “” Ga. Code § 14-3-856(a)(2)(B). Of course, the corporation cannot know, when presented with a demand for indemnity, whether its directors’ or officers’ conduct comports with the above statutory standards.”
— 14-3-856(a)(l) — 1 case
In re Nat'l Heritage Found., Inc., 478 B.R. 216 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012). “” Ga. Code § 14-3-856(a)(2)(B). Of course, the corporation cannot know, when presented with a demand for indemnity, whether its directors’ or officers’ conduct comports with the above statutory standards.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.