Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 14-5-46 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 14 CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND ASSOCIATIONS

Section 5. Miscellaneous Provisions Relating to Corporations, 14-5-1 through 14-5-51.

ARTICLE 3 CORPORATIONS ORGANIZED FOR RELIGIOUS, FRATERNAL, OR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES

14-5-46. Conveyances to churches or religious societies confirmed.

All deeds of conveyance executed before April 1, 1969, or thereafter for any lots of land within this state to any person or persons, to any church or religious society, or to trustees for the use of any church or religious society for the purpose of erecting churches or meeting houses shall be deemed to be valid and available in law for the intents, uses, and purposes contained in the deeds of conveyance. All lots of land so conveyed shall be fully and absolutely vested in such church or religious society or in their respective trustees for the uses and purposes expressed in the deed to be held by them or their trustees for their use by succession, according to the mode of church government or rules of discipline exercised by such churches or religious societies.

(Laws 1805, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 899; Code 1873, § 2343; Code 1882, § 2343; Civil Code 1895, § 2353; Civil Code 1910, § 2826; Code 1933, § 22-409; Code 1933, § 22-5507, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 565, § 1.)

Law reviews.

- For annual survey on real property, see 64 Mercer L. Rev. 255 (2012).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the provisions, decisions under former Code 1882, § 2343, and former Code 1933, § 22-409, are included in the annotations for this Code section.

General Consideration

Nothing in O.C.G.A. § 14-5-46 abrogates any other provision of Georgia law because by the statute's terms the statute refers to the validity of deeds of conveyance for the uses and purposes expressed in the deed, not to the imposition of a trust in favor of any use or purpose as expressed in other documents. Timberridge Presbyterian Church, Inc. v. Presbytery of Greater Atlanta, Inc., 307 Ga. App. 191, 705 S.E.2d 262 (2010).

There is no implied trust on local church property for the benefit of the general church. Presbyterian Church v. Eastern Heights Presbyterian Church, 225 Ga. 259, 167 S.E.2d 658 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1041, 90 S. Ct. 680, 24 L. Ed. 2d 685 (1970).

Interpretation of language of deeds.

- The trustees of a local church properly obtained property by a deed stating the property was granted to the local church, its successors, and assigns, in fee simple, because the language of the deed contemplated successors and assigns, which the parent church, being hierarchical, had become under its disciplinary rule that "The Association (parent church) shall hold all church property, regardless if members vote to change the church to some other faith." Crumbley v. Solomon, 243 Ga. 343, 254 S.E.2d 330 (1979).

O.C.G.A. § 14-5-46 is limited on the statute's face to "deeds of conveyance," and nothing in the language of O.C.G.A. § 14-5-46 limits the statute's application to the rules of a national church; in applying neutral principles of law, a court cannot ignore relevant statutes, documents of the local body, or the actual language of the relevant deeds, in favor of the rules of the national body, and O.C.G.A. § 14-5-46 is to be read in harmony with the principles established for the resolution of church property disputes: a court applies neutral principles of law to the intents, uses, and purposes contained in the deeds of conveyance, as well as the mode of church government or rules of discipline exercised by such churches or religious societies, on the local, regional, and national level as those pertain to the property at issue. Timberridge Presbyterian Church, Inc. v. Presbytery of Greater Atlanta, Inc., 307 Ga. App. 191, 705 S.E.2d 262 (2010).

Because the deeds at issue did not convey property to trustees, nor to the regional body representing a national church or the national church, but simply to a local church, O.C.G.A. § 14-5-46 could not be applied without reference to other statutory and case law, particularly when the imposition of a trust was alleged in the absence of any reference in the deeds; the requirements of the Georgia Trust Act, O.C.G.A. § 53-12-20, were consistent with determining the intentions of the parties by applying neutral principles of law to all the relevant deeds, statutes, constitutions, and charters of the local and national churches. Timberridge Presbyterian Church, Inc. v. Presbytery of Greater Atlanta, Inc., 307 Ga. App. 191, 705 S.E.2d 262 (2010).

Adverse possession.

- Possession of property for the use of a church by the constituent membership in possession of the church as such an entity is recognized by statute in this state, and if continued adversely for the prescriptive period, it will support prescriptive title. Slaughter v. Land, 194 Ga. 156, 21 S.E.2d 72 (1942); Bridges v. Henson, 216 Ga. 423, 116 S.E.2d 570 (1960) (decided under former Code 1933, § 22-409).

Cited in Carden v. LaGrone, 225 Ga. 365, 169 S.E.2d 168 (1969); Carnes v. Smith, 236 Ga. 30, 222 S.E.2d 322 (1976); Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595, 99 S. Ct. 3020, 61 L. Ed. 2d 775 (1979).

Church Schisms

1. In General

When local church estopped to deny existence of trust.

- When the trustees of a local church held church property and participated in making the association's (parent church) disciplinary rule that "The Association shall hold all church property, regardless if all members vote to change the church to some other faith," and did not contest its validity for 30 years, the local church could not deny the existence of a trust for the benefit of the general church. Crumbley v. Solomon, 243 Ga. 343, 254 S.E.2d 330 (1979).

When church documents irrelevant.

- Church documents that speak to resolution of doctrinal disputes and are silent as to which persons have the right to enjoy and to use the church property in the event of a schism at the local level are irrelevant to the question of which factions within the local congregation have the right to control the actions of the title holder, and thereby the use of property. Jones v. Wolf, 244 Ga. 388, 260 S.E.2d 84 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1080, 100 S. Ct. 1031, 62 L. Ed. 2d 763 (1980).

Statute inapplicable if no deed of conveyance.

- O.C.G.A. §§ 14-5-46 and14-5-47 were not applicable to a national church's action to quiet title in property held by a local church because there was no deed of conveyance to the trustees of the local church; two recorded title affidavits executed by lifetime attendees of the local church, one 79 years old and the other 80, asserted there had never been a question concerning the church's right of ownership of the property, but recorded affidavits relating to land are not conveyances or a legal proceeding by which one could attack the title to realty or cure a defect in the title, O.C.G.A. § 44-2-20. Kemp v. Neal, 288 Ga. 324, 704 S.E.2d 175 (2010).

2. Presumption of Majority Rule

Presumptive rule of majority representation.

- Georgia has adopted for use in church local schism cases a presumptive rule of majority representation, defeasible upon a showing that the identity of the local church is to be determined by some other means, which presumption is overcome under Georgia law by an application of "neutral principles" of law, that is, state statutes, corporate charters, relevant deeds, and the organizational constitutions of the denomination. Jones v. Wolf, 244 Ga. 388, 260 S.E.2d 84 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1080, 100 S. Ct. 1031, 62 L. Ed. 2d 763 (1980).

Principle of presumptive majority rule in local schism cases may be overcome by reliance upon neutral statutes, corporate charters, relevant deeds, and the organizational constitutions of the denomination. Jones v. Wolf, 244 Ga. 388, 260 S.E.2d 84 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1080, 100 S. Ct. 1031, 62 L. Ed. 2d 763 (1980).

3. Hierarchical and Congregational Churches Distinguished

Hierarchical churches are those organized as a body with other churches having similar faith and doctrine with a common ruling convocation or ecclesiastical head. Crumbley v. Solomon, 243 Ga. 343, 254 S.E.2d 330 (1979).

If church government is hierarchical, "neutral principles of law" determine whether the local church or parent church has the right to control local property. Crumbley v. Solomon, 243 Ga. 343, 254 S.E.2d 330 (1979).

"Neutral principles" are state statutes, corporate charters, relevant deeds, and the organizational constitutions of the denomination. Crumbley v. Solomon, 243 Ga. 343, 254 S.E.2d 330 (1979).

In a church property dispute between majority and minority factions of a local congregation, neutral principles of law, including the governing documents of the local and general churches, the title instruments, and the policy reflected in O.C.G.A. §§ 14-5-46 and14-5-47, showed that the property was impressed with an implied trust in favor of the Episcopal Church. Accordingly, summary judgment in favor of the Episcopal Church, the Georgia diocese, and a minority faction was proper because the Georgia bishop recognized the minority faction as the true church entitled to control of the church property. Rector v. Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Ga., Inc., 290 Ga. 95, 718 S.E.2d 237 (2011), cert. dismissed, 566 U.S. 1007, 132 S. Ct. 2439, 182 L. Ed. 2d 1059 (2012).

In a church property dispute, neutral principles of law, derived from the governing documents adopted by local and national churches, supported by the policy reflected in O.C.G.A. §§ 14-5-46 and14-5-47, and not contradicted by the deeds at issue, demonstrated that an implied trust in favor of the Presbyterian Church of the U.S.A. existed on a local church's property to which a corporation held legal title. Presbytery of Greater Atlanta, Inc. v. Timberridge Presbyterian Church, Inc., 290 Ga. 272, 719 S.E.2d 446 (2011), cert. denied, 567 U.S. 916, 132 S. Ct. 2772, 183 L. Ed. 2d 638 (2012).

A congregational church is one strictly independent of other ecclesiastical associations, and one that so far as church government is concerned, owes no fealty or obligation to any higher authority. Crumbley v. Solomon, 243 Ga. 343, 254 S.E.2d 330 (1979).

If church government is congregational, a majority of its members control its decisions and local church property. Crumbley v. Solomon, 243 Ga. 343, 254 S.E.2d 330 (1979).

Trustees

Trustees empowered to act regardless of recordation of appointment.

- Deeds to land made to trustees of religious societies are valid, and trustees of such societies, whether original trustees or successor trustees, are empowered to act for such societies in relation to such property whether the appointment of the trustees has been recorded or not. Jackson v. Oliphant, 88 Ga. App. 313, 76 S.E.2d 625 (1953) (decided under former Code 1933, § 22-409).

Trustee had no authority to act.

- In a quiet title action involving church property, the trial court erred in making the legal conclusion that the founding pastor held the church property in fee simple absolute instead of in trust for and on behalf of the religious corporation as Georgia law expressly authorizes the creation of religious land trusts and the deed expressly referred to the pastor as a trustee. As such, the trial court erred in ruling that fee simple absolute title to the property vested in another congregation by virtue of a 1998 warranty deed executed by the pastor as the pastor had no legal authority to transfer the property without the consent and approval of the religious corporation. Second Refuge Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Inc. v. Lollar, 282 Ga. 721, 653 S.E.2d 462 (2007).

Trust attaches to office not office holder.

- Title to property conveyed to a bishop for use of the church in fee simple, does not attach to the bishop's person, but to the office of bishop, and passes to the bishop's successor in office. Beckwith v. Rector, 69 Ga. 564 (1882) (decided under former Code 1882, § 2343).

Suits by trustees against holdover tenants.

- Trustees of an unincorporated religious society, holding title in themselves to the society's real property, may bring a dispossessory proceeding (or distress warrant for rent) through their secretary and agent against a tenant in possession of the property who is holding over and beyond the term and who refuses to pay rent. Jackson v. Oliphant, 88 Ga. App. 313, 76 S.E.2d 625 (1953) (decided under former Code 1933, § 22-409).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

- 77 C.J.S., Religious Societies, § 83.

ALR.

- Consolidation or merger of churches of same denomination as affecting property rights, 66 A.L.R. 177.

Undue influence in nontestamentary gift to clergyman, spiritual adviser, or church, 14 A.L.R.2d 649.

Determination of property rights between local church and parent church body: modern view, 52 A.L.R.3d 324.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 14-5-46 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 5

Presbytery of Greater Atlanta, Inc. v. Timberridge Presbyterian Church, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-11-21

Citation: 719 S.E.2d 446, 290 Ga. 272, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 4008, 2011 WL 5830490, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 941

Snippet: principles. (b) Statutes (1) OCGA § 14-5-46 OCGA § 14-5-46, which is entitled “Conveyances to churches

Rector of Christ Church v. Bishop of Episcopal Diocese of Georgia, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-11-21

Citation: 718 S.E.2d 237, 290 Ga. 95, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3631, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 932

Snippet: the Court of Appeals relied in part on OCGA §§ 14-5-46 and 14-5-47 in concluding that the property of

Kemp v. Neal

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-11-30

Citation: 704 S.E.2d 175, 288 Ga. 324, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3907, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 936

Snippet: discipline by which they may be governed (OCGA §§ 14-5-46, 14-5-47), these statutes are not applicable to

Second Refuge Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Inc. v. Lollar

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-11-21

Citation: 653 S.E.2d 462, 282 Ga. 721, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3601, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 846

Snippet: 551, 553, 233 S.E.2d 753 (1977). [7] OCGA § 14-5-46. [8] See, e.g., Carnes v. Smith, 236 Ga. 30, 30

HOLINESS BAPTIST ASS'N, INC. v. Barber

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-09-17

Citation: 552 S.E.2d 90, 274 Ga. 357, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2839, 2001 Ga. LEXIS 642

Snippet: v. Solomon at 345, 254 S.E.2d 330; see OCGA §§ 14-5-46; 14-5-47. And this is irrespective of the Church's