O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-2-20 (2019)

Recorded affidavits relating to land as notice of facts cited therein; admissibility of such affidavits in evidence; presumption as to facts recited; filing and recording

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Recorded affidavits shall be notice of the facts therein recited, whether taken at the time of a conveyance of land or not, where such affidavits show: (1) The relationship of parties or other persons to conveyances of land; (2) The relationship of any parties to any conveyance with other parties whose names are shown in the chain of title to lands; (3) The age or ages of any person or persons connected with the chain of title; (4) Whether the land embraced in any conveyance or any part of such land or right therein has been in the actual possession of any party or parties connected with the chain of title; (5) The payment of debts of an unadministered estate; (6) The fact or date of death of any person connected with such title; (7) Where such affidavits relate to the identity of parties whose names may be shown differently in chains of title; (8) Where such affidavits show the ownership or adverse possession of lands or that other persons have not owned such lands nor been in possession of same; or (9) Where such affidavits state any other fact or circumstance affecting title to land or any right, title, interest in, or lien or encumbrance upon land. Any such affidavits may be made by any person, whether connected with the chain of title or not. (b) In any litigation over any of the lands referred to and described in any of the affidavits referred to in subsection (a) of this Code section in any court in this state or in any proceedings in any such court involving the title to such lands wherein the facts recited in such affidavits may be material, the affidavits or certified copies of the record thereof shall be admissible in evidence and there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the statements in said affidavits are true. The affidavits or certified copies thereof shall only be admissible as evidence in the event the parties making the affidavits are

deceased; they are nonresidents of the state; their residences are unknown to the parties offering the affidavits; or they are too old, infirm, or sick to attend court. (c) Affidavits referred to in subsections (a) and (b) of this Code section shall be filed by the clerk of the superior court of the county where the land is located and shall contain a caption referring to the current owner and to a deed or other recorded instrument in the chain of title of the affected land. The clerk of the superior court shall record such affidavits, shall enter on the deed or other recorded instrument so referred to the book and page number on which such affidavit may be recorded, and shall index same in the name of the purported owner as shown by such caption in both grantor and grantee indexes in deed records as conveyances of lands are recorded and indexed; and he shall receive the same compensation therefor as for recording deeds to lands.

History

(Ga. L. 1955, p. 614, §§ 1-3; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 44.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Some Rescission Problems in Truth-In-Lending, as

Viewed From Georgia,’’ see 7 Ga. St. B.J. 315 (1971).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS possession filed by the owner of the first floor of a building with regard to a 1,350 square foot space on the second floor of the building as the renter established that title was acquired via a quit claim deed, that the renter changed the door at the base of the stairwell and had sole access to the second floor space, as well as posted no trespassing signs. The owner of the first floor failed to establish a continuous, exclusive, and uninterrupted possession of the space based on sporadic repairs made to the roof of the entire building. MEA Family Invs., LP v. Adams, 284 Ga. 407, 667 S.E.2d 609 (2008). Ga. L. 1955, p. 614, §§ 1-3 (see O.C.G.A. § 44-2-20) provided an exception to both the hearsay rule and to former Code 1933, § 38-1603 (see O.C.G.A. § 24-9-1), relating to competency of witnesses. King v. King, 238 Ga. 268, 232 S.E.2d 549 (1977). Affidavit admissible only if affiant unavailable. - Affidavits shall be admissible only when the person making the affidavit is not available as a witness for stated reasons. Dollar v. Thompson, 212 Ga. 831, 96 S.E.2d 493 (1957). Cited in Parker v. Adamson, 109 Ga. App. 172, 135 S.E.2d 487 (1964); Jones v. Van Vleck, 224 Ga. 796, 164 S.E.2d 724 (1968); Crane v. Gaddis, 224 Ga. 804, 164 S.E.2d 844

Statute will be strictly construed by the court. Dollar v. Thompson, 212 Ga. 831, 96 S.E.2d 493 (1957) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-2-20). Contents of affidavit. - Properly recorded affidavit ‘‘shall’’ contain a caption showing the information enumerated in this statute. This is made mandatory by the use of the word ‘‘shall,’’ rather than permissive language. Dollar v. Thompson, 212 Ga. 831, 96 S.E.2d 493 (1957) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-2-20). Although affidavit gave proper statutory notice to the corporations as to the identity of the property owner, referred to the county grantor-grantee index, was properly witnessed and notarized, and contained other proper information, it did not settle the question of the identity of the property owner’s heirs; thus, since a question of fact remained as to whether the affidavit afforded the corporations with actual or constructive notice as to a claim by the property owner’s excluded spouse, the trial court should not have granted summary judgment to the corporations as to the claim of the one relative. Bowman v. Century Funding, Ltd., 277 Ga. App. 540, 627 S.E.2d 73 (2006). Affidavit cancelled. - Trial court properly granted a renter summary judgment and removed an affidavit asserting adverse

(1968); Minor v. Ray, 122 Ga. App. 531, 177 S.E.2d 842 (1970). RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Necessity of showing authority or qualification of affiant in affidavit made in behalf of corporation, 3 ALR 132.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2021 · leading case: Bank of Am., N.A. v. Adams (In re Adams), 583 B.R. 541 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2018).
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Adams (In re Adams), 583 B.R. 541 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2018). · cites it 18× “Moreover, according to the Trustee, cross-indexing does not have the effect that BANA ascribes to it: "[T]he only legal support that Plaintiff cites for this proposition is a discussion of affidavits recordable under O.”
Kemp v. Neal, 704 S.E.2d 175 (Ga. 2010). · cites it 8× “2d 561 (1981); OCGA § 44-2-20. In the absence of deeds of conveyance and of applicable statutes, we turn to the Book of Discipline, the governing ecclesiastical doctrine and constitution of the AME church.”
Bank of North Georgia v. Windermere Dev., Inc., 728 S.E.2d 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “At most, the affidavit is one concerning title under OCGA § 44-2-20, and, as the statute then in effect provided, the affidavit would he admissible in litigation “over any of the lands referred to” in the affidavit, but only if the party making the affidavit is unavailable to…”
Summer Crest at Four Seasons on Lanier Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Great Water Lanier, LLC, 811 S.E.2d 1 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “6 OCGA § 44-2-20 does not require a different result.”
Hopkins v. Virginia Highland Assocs., L.P., 541 S.E.2d 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “In a footnote in his motion for reconsideration, Meddin also contends that under OCGA § 44-2-20, the July 1988 letter “served the same function as an affidavit affecting title.”
Bowman v. Century Funding, Ltd., 627 S.E.2d 73 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “This Court has held that an affidavit of descent which does not satisfy the formal requirements of OCGA§ 44-2-20 (c) is invalid, and cannot provide notice to a bona fide purchaser.”
Cronan v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 784 S.E.2d 57 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “” OCGA § 44-2-20 provides in part: Recorded affidavits shall be notice of the facts therein recited, whether taken at the time of a conveyance of land or not, where such affidavits show .”
La Chona, LLC v. Aberra, 797 S.E.2d 895 (Ga. 2017). · cites it 4× “” (citations omitted)); OCGA § 44-2-20. See also Kemp v. Neal, 288 Ga.”
Mea Fam. Investments, Lp v. Adams, 667 S.E.2d 609 (Ga. 2008). · cites it 2× “Shortly thereafter, Appellant, acting pursuant to OCGA § 44-2-20, filed an affidavit asserting title by adverse possession.”
Gordon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Codrington), 430 B.R. 287 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2009). · cites it 2× “By signing the waiver, the borrowers waived a right to notice and hearing in the event of a non-judicial foreclosure; the waiver has nothing to do with title to the Property. Even if the waiver were an affidavit, it would not be recordable because it contains no reference to a…”
Jones v. Dykes, 497 S.E.2d 828 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “The lack of a transcript likewise precludes our review of Jones’ contention that the trial court violated OCGA § 44-2-20 by admitting Mrs. Smith’s son’s “ex parte unrecorded affidavit.”
In Re Stroh, 523 S.E.2d 887 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). “10 Alabama has adopted an almost identical provision, Alabama Code § 44-2-20 et seq. 11 Alabama has adopted a similar version of the UCCJA, Alabama Code § 30-3-20 et seq.”
— 44-2-20(a) — 2 cases
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Adams (In re Adams), 583 B.R. 541 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2018). “Moreover, according to the Trustee, cross-indexing does not have the effect that BANA ascribes to it: "[T]he only legal support that Plaintiff cites for this proposition is a discussion of affidavits recordable under O.”
Lubin v. Everhome Mortg. Co., LLC (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2020).
— 44-2-20(a)(9) — 1 case
Lubin v. Everhome Mortg. Co., LLC (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2020).
— 44-2-20(c) — 2 cases
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Adams (In re Adams), 583 B.R. 541 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2018). “Moreover, according to the Trustee, cross-indexing does not have the effect that BANA ascribes to it: "[T]he only legal support that Plaintiff cites for this proposition is a discussion of affidavits recordable under O.”
Lubin v. Everhome Mortg. Co., LLC (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.