O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-9-803 (2019)

Winding up

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) After dissolution, except as provided in the partnership agreement, the general partners who have not withdrawn or, if none, the limited partners may wind up the limited partnership’s affairs but, if one or more of such general partners have engaged in wrongful conduct, or upon other cause shown, the court may wind up the limited partnership’s affairs upon application of a partner, his legal representative, or assignee.

(b) Unless otherwise provided in writing in the partnership agreement, the persons winding up the limited partnership’s affairs may, in the name of, and for and on behalf of, the limited partnership:

(1) Prosecute and defend suits, whether civil, criminal, or administrative;

(2) Settle and close the limited partnership’s business;

(3) Dispose of and convey the limited partnership’s property for cash;

(4) Discharge the limited partnership’s liabilities; and

(5) Distribute to the partners any remaining assets of the limited partnership.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-9-803, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1016, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 931, § 14.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For note on 1989 amendment to this Code section, see 6 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 184 (1989).

COMMENT Note to Georgia Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act This section states who may wind up the limited partnership’s affairs after dissolution, and the powers of such persons. It applies to the exclusion of Section 14-8-37 (see Section 14-9-1204). Prior Georgia Law In the absence of a limited partnership act provision, the Uniform Partnership Act applied. Section 14-8-37 provides for winding up of a partnership by non-wrongful partners, the legal representative of the last surviving partner, or by the court ‘‘upon cause shown.’’ Comparison With Official RULPA Subsection (a) was changed from the official version to clarify that withdrawn partners may not participate in winding up unless otherwise agreed. This was made particularly unclear in RULPA by the reference to partners ‘‘who have not wrongfully dissolved:’’ Since the usual method of wrongful dissolution is voluntary withdrawal in violation of the partnership agreement, RULPA implies that rightfully withdrawing partners can participate in winding up. Unlike under RULPA, a general partner who has engaged in wrongful conduct without withdrawing may participate in winding up unless the limited partnership’s affairs are wound up by the court or unless the agreement provides otherwise. Subsection (b) is based on Section 17-803 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, Section 17-803 (Supp. 1986). Cross-References Limited partnership continues to exist after dissolution until cancellation of certificate: §§ 14-8-30, 14-9-201(b). Post-dissolution partner acts binding the partnership: § 14-8-33 et seq. When general partner ceases to be such: § 14-9-602. Wrongful withdrawal of general partner: § 14-9-602(c). Causes of dissolution of limited partnership: § 14-9-801. RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 59A Am. Jur. 2d, Partnership, § 898.

C.J.S. - 68 C.J.S., Partnership, § 610 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2012–2018 · leading case: Trauner v. Thadikamalla (In re Thadikamalla), 481 B.R. 232 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2012).
Trauner v. Thadikamalla (In re Thadikamalla), 481 B.R. 232 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2012). · cites it 4× “O.C.G.A. §§ 14-9-803(a) & 14-9-705. Because the Partnership continued and was not wound up, Mr.”
In re A & B Assocs., L.P., 593 B.R. 27 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2018). · cites it 6× “is a dissolved limited partnership, and is restricted to activities which constitute the "winding up of affairs" within the meaning of O.C.G.A. § 14-9-803 ; (3) While A & B Associates, L.”
— 14-9-803(a) — 1 case
Trauner v. Thadikamalla (In re Thadikamalla), 481 B.R. 232 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2012). “O.C.G.A. §§ 14-9-803(a) & 14-9-705. Because the Partnership continued and was not wound up, Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.