O.C.G.A.

14-9A-110 (2019)

Applicability of article; renewal of existing partnerships restricted

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This article is applicable only to limited partnerships which were in existence on February 15, 1952, and which have not become limited partnerships subject to Article 1 of this chapter or Chapter 9 of this title.

(b) No limited partnership continuing existence under this article shall be renewed pursuant to this article unless such renewal is provided for in the original agreement.

(c) Except as otherwise provided in this Code section, this article shall have no force or effect after February 15, 1952, and no limited partnership shall be formed pursuant to this article after said date.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-9-110; Code 1981, § 14-9A-110, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1016, § 1; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1016, § 3.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1989–2001 · leading case: Stamps v. Knobloch (In Re City Commc'ns, Ltd.), 105 B.R. 1018 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Stamps v. Knobloch (In Re City Commc'ns, Ltd.), 105 B.R. 1018 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1989). · cites it 2× “In 1988, the Georgia General Assembly enacted OCGA § 14-9A-110, et. seq. in which an element of creditor reliance was added to the provisions relating to imposition of liability of a general partner.”

Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. Bank of Am., N.A., 174 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Ga. 2001). · cites it 2× “I and II are governed by O.C.G.A. §§ 14-9A-110 to -130 (1994), because they were formed prior to 1952.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.