O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-1-1 (2019)

Where judicial power vested

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The judicial power is vested in such tribunals as are created by the Constitution of this state, such other inferior courts as are or may be established by law, and such persons as are or may be specially invested with powers of a judicial nature. Cross references. - Judicial power of the state, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Para. I.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 197; Code 1868, § 191; Code 1873, § 203; Code 1882, § 203; Civil Code 1895, § 4043; Civil Code 1910, § 4640; Code 1933, § 24-101.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Kitson v. Hawke, 136 Ga. App. 92, 220 S.E.2d 28 (1975).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Courts, § 1 et seq.

C.J.S. - 21 C.J.S., Courts, § 106 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Blash v. State, 898 S.E.2d 522 (Ga. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Blash v. State, 898 S.E.2d 522 (Ga. 2024). · cites it 2× “I (providing that “[t]he judicial power of the state shall be vested” in this Court, among others); OCGA § 15-1-1 (stating that “[t]he judicial power is vested in such tribunals as are created by the Constitution of this state”).”
Blash v. State, No. S23A1096 (Ga. Feb. 20, 2024). · cites it 2× “I (providing that “[t]he judicial power of the state shall be vested” in this Court, 14 among others); OCGA § 15-1-1 (stating that “[t]he judicial power is vested in such tribunals as are created by the Constitution of this state”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.