Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 15-11-104 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 15-11-104 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 15-11-104

TITLE 15 COURTS

Section 11. Juvenile Code, 15-11-1 through 15-11-747.

ARTICLE 3 DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS

15-11-104. Appointment and removal of guardian ad litem; use of a CASA.

  1. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for an alleged dependent child.
  2. An attorney for an alleged dependent child may serve as such child's guardian ad litem unless or until there is conflict of interest between the attorney's duty to such child as such child's attorney and the attorney's considered opinion of such child's best interests as guardian ad litem.
  3. A party to the proceeding, the employee or representative of a party to the proceeding, or any other individual with a conflict of interest shall not be appointed as guardian ad litem.
  4. A court shall appoint a CASA to act as guardian ad litem whenever possible, and a CASA may be appointed in addition to an attorney who is serving as a guardian ad litem.
  5. A lay guardian shall not engage in activities which could reasonably be construed as the practice of law.
  6. Before the appointment as a guardian ad litem, such person shall have received training appropriate to the role as guardian ad litem which is administered or approved by the Office of the Child Advocate for the Protection of Children. For attorneys, preappointment guardian ad litem training shall be satisfied within the attorney's existing continuing legal education obligations and shall not require the attorney to complete additional training hours in addition to the hours required by the State Bar of Georgia.
  7. Any volunteer guardian ad litem authorized and acting in good faith, in the absence of fraud or malice and in accordance with the duties required by this Code section, shall have immunity from any liability, civil or criminal, that might otherwise be incurred or imposed as a result of taking or failing to take any action pursuant to this Code section.
  8. The court may remove a guardian ad litem from a case upon finding that the guardian ad litem acted in a manner contrary to a child's best interests, has not appropriately participated in the case, or if the court otherwise deems continued service as inappropriate or unnecessary.
  9. A guardian ad litem shall not engage in ex parte contact with the court except as otherwise provided by law.
  10. The court, a child, or any other party may compel a guardian ad litem for a child to attend a trial or hearing relating to such child and to testify, if appropriate, as to the proper disposition of a proceeding.
  11. The court shall ensure that parties have the ability to challenge recommendations made by the guardian ad litem or the factual basis for the recommendations in accordance with the rules of evidence applicable to the specific proceeding.
  12. A guardian ad litem's report shall not be admissible into evidence prior to the disposition hearing except in accordance with the rules of evidence applicable to the specific proceeding.
  13. A guardian ad litem who is not also serving as attorney for a child may be called as a witness for the purpose of cross-examination regarding the guardian ad litem's report even if the guardian ad litem is not identified as a witness by a party.

(Code 1981, §15-11-104, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under pre-2014 Code Sections 15-11-9(b) and 15-11-9.1(j)(1), which were subsequently repealed but were succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section. See the Editor's notes at the beginning of the chapter.

Impeachment testimony from CASA representative properly excluded.

- In an action wherein two parents were found to have deprived an adopted child due to one parent's sexual abuse of the child and the other parent's failure to protect the child from such abuse, the juvenile court properly refused to allow a court-appointed special advocate (CASA) to impeach a prior foster child whom the parents had previously cared for as former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-9.1 established confidentiality of the CASA's information. Further, allowing such testimony was inconsistent with the CASA program and the parents had multiple witnesses to impeach the foster child. In the Interest of B.H., 295 Ga. App. 297, 671 S.E.2d 303 (2008) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-9.1)

Discovery from guardian ad litem's file.

- Juvenile order granting a guardian a protective order against a mother was vacated because the juvenile court erred in imposing blanket protection for the guardian ad litem's file under a privilege exception to discovery; on remand, the juvenile court was directed to exercise the court's discretion to determine whether the material sought by the mother was privileged or otherwise should not be subject to discovery. In the Interest of J. N., 344 Ga. App. 409, 810 S.E.2d 191 (2018).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under pre-2014 Code Section 15-11-9(b), which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section. See the Editor's notes at the beginning of the chapter.

Appointment of guardian in deprivation proceedings.

- Under the principle that the law is to be liberally construed toward the protection of the child whose well-being is threatened, deprivation proceedings arising from child abuse and neglect by a parent or caretaker present a conflict of interest wherein the provisions concerning the appointment of a guardian ad litem would apply. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-131.

Applicability to deprivation proceedings.

- Inasmuch as the juvenile court's jurisdiction encompasses proceedings in which a child was alleged to be deprived, former Code 1933, § 24A-3301 (see former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-9) applied to a deprived child as defined in former Code 1933, § 24A-401 (see former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-2). 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-131.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 42 Am. Jur. 2d, Infants, § 151 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 43 C.J.S., Infants, § 308 et seq.

U.L.A.

- Uniform Juvenile Court Act (U.L.A.) § 51.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 15-11-104 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 2

In the Interest of C. S.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-05-14

Citation: 282 Ga. 7, 644 S.E.2d 812

Snippet: (citations and punctuation omitted). See also OCGA § 15-11-104 (statutory provisions relating generally to juvenile

In Re Cs

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-05-14

Citation: 644 S.E.2d 812

Snippet: (citations and punctuation omitted). See also OCGA § 15-11-104 (statutory provisions relating generally to juvenile