Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 15-11-38 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 15 COURTS

Section 11. Juvenile Code, 15-11-1 through 15-11-747.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

15-11-38. Community based risk reduction programs.

  1. Any court may order the establishment of a community based risk reduction program, within the geographical jurisdiction of the court, for the purpose of utilizing available community resources in assessment and intervention in cases of delinquency, dependency, or children in need of services so long as the court determines that sufficient funds are available for such programs. Subject to the procedures, requirements, and supervision established in the order creating such program, any individual and any public or private agency or entity may participate in the program.
  2. As part of a risk reduction program, a court may implement or adopt an early intervention program designed to identify children and families who are at risk of becoming involved with the court. Such early intervention program shall be for the purpose of developing and implementing intervention actions or plans to divert the children and their families from becoming involved in future cases in the court. The court's involvement shall be for the limited purpose of facilitating the development of the program and for the purpose of protecting the confidentiality of the children and families participating in the program.
  3. As part of an early intervention program, the court may enter into protocol agreements with school systems within the court's jurisdiction, the county division of family and children services, the county department of health, DJJ, any state or local department or agency, any mental health agency or institution, local physicians or health care providers, licensed counselors and social workers, and any other social service, charitable, or other entity or any other agency or individual providing educational or treatment services to families and children within the jurisdiction of the court. Such protocol agreements shall authorize the exchange of confidential information in the same manner and subject to the same restrictions, conditions, and penalties as provided in Code Section 15-11-40.
  4. When any agency or entity participating in a protocol agreement identifies a child who is at risk of becoming a delinquent child, dependent child, or child in need of services, the agency or entity shall refer the case to a multiagency staffing panel. The panel shall develop a multiagency intervention plan for such child. Such child or his or her parent, or both, may be present during any review of such child's case by the panel. A child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian shall be notified of the intervention plan by the agency making the referral or by a person or entity designated by the panel to administer the program. The staff of the court, other than the judge, shall work with the other agencies involved to educate a child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian and such child on the importance of following the intervention plan and on the consequences if anyone is referred to the court. If an intervention plan is developed for a child and his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian consents to such plan, the failure to comply with the plan or any portion thereof may constitute the basis for a referral to DFCS.

(Code 1981, §15-11-38, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242; Ga. L. 2014, p. 780, § 1-6/SB 364.)

The 2014 amendment, effective April 28, 2014, substituted "division" for "department" near the beginning of the first sentence of subsection (c).

Law reviews.

- For article, "Georgia's Juvenile Code: New Law for the New Year," see 19 Ga. St. B. J. 13 (Dec. 2013).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Validity and efficacy of minor's waiver of right to counsel - cases decided since application of Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed. 2d 527 (1967), 101 A.L.R.5th 351.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 15-11-38 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 8

Bun v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-02-16

Snippet: SE2d 184) (1989) (recognizing that former OCGA § 15-11-38 (b), now codified at OCGA § 15-11-703, specifically

Bun v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-02-16

Citation: 296 Ga. 549, 769 S.E.2d 381, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 126

Snippet: SE2d 184) (1989) (recognizing that former OCGA § 15-11-38 (b), now codified at OCGA § 15-11-703, specifically

Wilson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-11-01

Citation: 525 S.E.2d 339, 271 Ga. 811, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 501, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 1035

Snippet: 258 Ga. 841 (7) (376 SE2d 184) (1989); OCGA § 15-11-38 (b). Wilson further contends that evidence of

Smith v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-11-09

Citation: 510 S.E.2d 1, 270 Ga. 240, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 3788, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 1057

Snippet: Ga. 841, 844 (7) (376 SE2d 184) (1989); OCGA § 15-11-38 (b). The record shows that the detective complied

In re T. B.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-06-30

Citation: 268 Ga. 149, 486 S.E.2d 177

Snippet: treatment and protection of juveniles. OCGA § 15-11-38. In the Interest of S. H, 220 Ga. App. 569, 571

In Re TB

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-06-30

Citation: 486 S.E.2d 177, 268 Ga. 149, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 2342, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 361

Snippet: treatment and protection of juveniles. OCGA § 15-11-38. In the Interest of S.H., 220 Ga.App. 569, 571

Waugh v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-12-02

Citation: 437 S.E.2d 297, 263 Ga. 692

Snippet: is predicated on the proposition that [OCGA § 15-11-38] (b) was violated.... While the record reflects

Burrell v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1989-02-08

Citation: 376 S.E.2d 184, 258 Ga. 841, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 56

Snippet: proceedings after conviction of a felony. See OCGA § 15-11-38 (b). No error was committed by allowing the juvenile