Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Magistrates and constables shall be considered officers of the superior court so far as to be subject to be ruled under similar conditions as are provided in relation to any other officer of the court and shall be subject to all the penalties as are provided in case of a rule absolute against sheriffs and other officers of the court when they, or either of them, refuse or neglect to collect or to pay over any money which they may have received or collected in their official capacities.
(Laws 1820, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 649; Laws 1839, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 651; Code 1863, § 3865; Code 1968, § 3885; Code 1873, § 3961; Ga. L. 1876, p. 37, § 1; Code 1882, § 3961; Civil Code 1895, §§ 4060, 4782; Civil Code 1910, §§ 4657, 5354; Code 1933, § 24-205; Ga. L. 1983, p. 884, § 4-1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 15.)
- The language in this Code section is derived in part from the decision in Barrett & Caswell v. Pulliam, 77 Ga. 552 (1886).
- Liability of magistrates and constables to be ruled, Rules of the Judicial Qualifications Commission.
- This section cannot be construed to give the superior court power to punish a justice of the peace (now magistrate) for taking an affidavit of a prisoner brought before the justice by the jailor. In re Russell, 54 Ga. 621 (1875).
No rule lies against a justice of the peace (now magistrate) if the justice has collected money on a garnishment and paid the money to the sheriff. Taylor v. Benjamin, 76 Ga. 762 (1886).
- City Court of Decatur does not have jurisdiction to rule against constable of justice of the peace (now magistrate) court to require constable to pay over money alleged to have been collected under an execution issued from a justice of the peace (now magistrate) court. Richardson v. Waits, 58 Ga. App. 143, 198 S.E. 116 (1938).
Fact that constable made levy after rule absolute to which claim was interposed and sustained would not relieve the constable from attachment for failure to pay under the rule absolute. Langley v. Wynn, 70 Ga. 430 (1883).
- This section makes justice of the peace (now magistrate) subject to same procedure as other officers; one month's written notice is not required. Christopher v. Nixon, 134 Ga. 7, 67 S.E. 406 (1910).
Damages must be alleged by reason of the failure, refusal, or neglect of the justice of the peace (now magistrate). Barrett & Caswell v. Pulliam, 77 Ga. 552 (1886).
Cited in Abbott v. Holland, 20 Ga. 598 (1856).
- Constable failing to pay over any money coming into the constable's possession may be ruled for contempt either in superior court or in the justice of the peace (now magistrate) court. 1952-53 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 33.
No results found for Georgia Code 15-13-7.