O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-14-21 (2019)

Purpose

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is declared by the General Assembly that the practice of court reporting carries important responsibilities in connection with the administration of justice, both in and out of the courts; that court reporters are officers of the courts; and that the right to define and regulate the practice of court reporting belongs naturally and logically to the judicial branch of the state government. Therefore, in recognition of these principles, the purpose of this article is to act in aid of the judiciary so as to ensure minimum proficiency in the practice of court reporting by recognizing and conferring jurisdiction upon the Judicial Council of Georgia to define and regulate the practice of court reporting.

History

(Ga. L. 1974, p. 345, § 2; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1315, § 7.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Judicial Council of Georgia and Board of Court Reporting were part of the judiciary and therefore excluded from coverage. - Judicial Council of Georgia and the Board of Court Reporting of the Judicial Council of Georgia fell within ‘‘the judiciary,’’ as that term

was used in O.C.G.A. § 50-13-2(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act, and therefore were exempt from the coverage of the Act and immune from a suit challenging a court reporter ethics rule the board adopted. Judicial Council v. Brown & Gallo, LLC, 288 Ga. 294, 702 S.E.2d 894 (2010).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Jud. Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLO, 702 S.E.2d 894 (Ga. 2010).
Jud. Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLO, 702 S.E.2d 894 (Ga. 2010). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 15-14-21. The General Assembly further recognized the Council as “an agency of the judicial branch.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.